Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, VCK said:

However, female pop singers do tend to find huge success quicker than most other kinds of artists tend to do

yep, but that's normally down to marketing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Well we are pretty sure we know our headliners so it’s probably much better to discuss the rest of the bill.

I’m still not convinced we do. I think there’s a curveball coming.  The ones in discussion as nailed on don’t convince me. Can’t put my finger on why, they just don’t fit in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

I’m still not convinced we do. I think there’s a curveball coming.  The ones in discussion as nailed on don’t convince me. Can’t put my finger on why, they just don’t fit in my mind.

well done, don't fall for matt's plan to entrap you to his ever changing dartboard predictions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AM/GNR/Elton - no way, surely.

AM/Styles/Elton - maybe, but still doesn’t have the usual balance of genre/style of act they usually aim for.

AM or Styles/something drastically different*/Elton feels closer to the mark.

* Beyoncé returns/Due Lipa/Lizzo at a stretch would all fit this gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therefused said:

Is Rihanna ruled out? My thinking is AM, Rihanna, Elton 

Only that she hasn’t toured or released music in years and as far as we know, has no plans to do either.  That would balance it up, but would also be a curveball for the ages.  Seems like a stretch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

AM/GNR/Elton - no way, surely.

AM/Styles/Elton - maybe, but still doesn’t have the usual balance of genre/style of act they usually aim for.

AM or Styles/something drastically different*/Elton feels closer to the mark.

* Beyoncé returns/Due Lipa/Lizzo at a stretch would all fit this gap.

Styles can only do Sunday I think so he’s out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

He’s only in Belgium not the other side of the world … ok it might be a stretch but a long way from impossible 

Well he’s going to struggle because Elton is headlining the Sunday.

Styles ain’t doing it.

The headliners are AM, GNR, Elton. It’s a let down after the great trios we’ve had, but unfortunately it’s what we are getting.

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Well he’s going to struggle because Elton is headlining the Sunday.

Styles ain’t doing it.

The headliners are AM, GNR, Elton. It’s a let down after the great trios we’ve had, but unfortunately it’s what we are getting.

Can also do Fri unless I’m missing something ? And Am are also available sat ? 

Edited by Crazyfool01
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

They’re playing Glasgow on Sunday and don’t tend to do consecutive nights in different cities. 

it looks logical I agree ... although im not 100% convinced its nailed on yet ... I presume they wont need quite a bit of the tour kit for the farm . maybe im willing a curveball into existence though , will no doubt find out soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Can also do Fri unless I’m missing something ? And Am are also available sat ? 

You’re missing the fact that he isn’t doing consecutive nights in different venues anywhere in this tour and didn’t on the last either.

Edited by Hugh Jass II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Well he’s going to struggle because Elton is headlining the Sunday.

Styles ain’t doing it.

The headliners are AM, GNR, Elton. It’s a let down after the great trios we’ve had, but unfortunately it’s what we are getting.

That is a great trio. At least as good as last year's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Well he’s going to struggle because Elton is headlining the Sunday.

Styles ain’t doing it.

The headliners are AM, GNR, Elton. It’s a let down after the great trios we’ve had, but unfortunately it’s what we are getting.


This just doesn't feel right. I can't really explain it but I just know it's wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...