Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Alvoram said:

His record sales and streaming numbers say otherwise. 🤷‍♂️

So I corrected that for you 🙂 

Commercial success doesn't mean, or even indicate, quality.

Also this is a forum, obviously almost everything anyone comments here is opinion - do we really have to put "imo" after every statement to ensure you can parse the meaning of a comment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MaxPower said:

Commercial success doesn't mean, or even indicate, quality.

Also this is a forum, obviously almost everything anyone comments here is opinion - do we really have to put "imo" after every statement to ensure you can parse the meaning of a comment?

No of course not, but your original phrasing was far too indicative of fact for my liking. (I knew what you meant, I was just having a little fun. 😛 )

Quality is obviously subjective, and it means different things to different people. Therefore, record sales can be a fair indicator of the general consensus, regarding the quality of an album / song, amongst those who've heard it. Not the be all and end all, of course. People absolutely do buy things that are objectively crap. (You only have to look at the success of late night tv shopping for evidence of this.)

Additionally, there are great artists, with great music, who just haven't got the kind of reach that some of the established artists have. They will have low sales numbers, but that doesn't make them crap. 

My point is that ultimately, if everybody thought that his records were terrible quality, people wouldn't buy them, or certainly wouldn't continue buying them with each and every new album drop. 

(P.s sorry if my correcting your phrasing caused you offence, it was genuinely supposed to be a bit of fun, it's fairly obvious you were speaking subjectively.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Alvoram said:

My point is that ultimately, if everybody thought that his records were terrible quality, people wouldn't buy them, or certainly wouldn't continue buying them with each and every new album drop. 
 

Streaming numbers are a bit of strange barometer. These days I'll stream half a dozen new albums every week and most likely never listen to them again. Massive acts like Eminem will inevitable do big numbers because they're a big name and when people hear they've got a new album out they'll give it a listen or two.

I'd be curious to know what the numbers look like a week, a month and a year after their releases, which would give a clearer indication as to how popular they actually are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Streaming numbers are a bit of strange barometer. These days I'll stream half a dozen new albums every week and most likely never listen to them again. Massive acts like Eminem will inevitable do big numbers because they're a big name and when people hear they've got a new album out they'll give it a listen or two.

I'd be curious to know what the numbers look like a week, a month and a year after their releases, which would give a clearer indication as to how popular they actually are.

It’s more the retention numbers I was talking about. If he didn’t have people coming back again and again, then the point you make would be valid. But his latest album, released in jan 2020 at number 1, was number 11 12 months later in the UK end of year charts. In the US billboard 200 it’s 2020 year end position was 21, and it’s 2021 year end position was 46. That is pretty insane numbers 2 whole years after release. 
 

The album before that ended it’s first year at 17 in the US billboard 200, and ended it’s second year at 52.

Hope that answers your question?

Edited by Alvoram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alvoram said:

It’s more the retention numbers I was talking about. If he didn’t have people coming back again and again, then the point you make would be valid. But his latest album, released in jan 2020 at number 1, was number 11 12 months later in the UK end of year charts. In the US billboard 200 it’s 2020 year end position was 21, and it’s 2021 year end position was 46. That is pretty insane numbers 2 whole years after release. 
 

The album before that ended it’s first year at 17 in the US billboard 200, and ended it’s second year at 52.

Hope that answers your question?

That does answer my question and that's exactly what I was curious about.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Hugh Jass II said:

The Red Hot Chilli Peppers sell loads of albums. Millions of people watch Mrs Brown's Boys.

Doesn't mean they're not shit.

That’s the point though right? 

You might believe they’re shit (I agree on both counts) but there’s clearly lots of people who disagree. 

Our opinions don’t make them more or less likely to be a headliner. 

Their record sales are, amongst many other things, a bigger indication. 

(FWIW I wouldn’t watch Eminem, I think he’d stink the place out. But if he were to headline, loads of people would go and loads would love it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nikkic said:

That’s the point though right? 

You might believe they’re shit (I agree on both counts) but there’s clearly lots of people who disagree. 

Our opinions don’t make them more or less likely to be a headliner. 

Their record sales are, amongst many other things, a bigger indication. 

(FWIW I wouldn’t watch Eminem, I think he’d stink the place out. But if he were to headline, loads of people would go and loads would love it).

Oh definitely, I've long argued against the "I don't like them so they shouldn't headline" line.

I think Eminem is a bad fit in terms of quality and overall vibe, but the numbers can't be argued against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nikkic said:

That’s the point though right? 

You might believe they’re shit (I agree on both counts) but there’s clearly lots of people who disagree. 

Our opinions don’t make them more or less likely to be a headliner. 

Their record sales are, amongst many other things, a bigger indication. 

(FWIW I wouldn’t watch Eminem, I think he’d stink the place out. But if he were to headline, loads of people would go and loads would love it).

Exactly - one of the great things about Glastonbury is that when something shit is on there's plenty of other things that you go elsewhere.  Objectively shit or shit in the eyes of a few, or just personal opinion.  Objectively Mrs Brown's Boys and RHCP are great because the figures back them up, booking them makes sense on many levels and you don't need to keep all the hipsters happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

The Red Hot Chilli Peppers sell loads of albums. Millions of people watch Mrs Brown's Boys.

Doesn't mean they're not shit.

Disagree on the former (if more for having the good song rather than necessarily album), but I will admit I wasn't exactly aware Mrs Brown's Boys was still a thing. Thought it had stopped making new stuff after the movie got a bit of a kicking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass II said:

The Red Hot Chilli Peppers sell loads of albums. Millions of people watch Mrs Brown's Boys.

Doesn't mean they're not shit.

Doesnt mean they're not not shit either 😄 

By the way Mrs Browns Boys is beyond shit.... its outright criminal and he should be locked up for offences to comedy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Alkaline Trio 90 Barrington Levy 80 Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 100 Billy Ocean 100 The Black Keys 80 Carl Cox 100 Chase & Status 120 Chelsea Wolfe 80 CMAT 135  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 Disclosure 60 Everything Everything 110 Faithless 80 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130 Garbage 100 GOAT 105 Greentea Peng 120 Happy Mondays 70 Hollie Cook 90 Jorja Smith 100 José González 100 Joy Crookes 120 Judas Priest 70 (-10) Kasabian 80 Kneecap 115 Levellers 85 Limp Bizkit 10 Linkin Park 90 Lorde 120 Madness 75 The Maccabees 100 Neck Deep 135 Nile Rodgers & Chic 100 Overmono 100 Pixies 35 The Prodigy 140 Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 100 Ren 50 Richard Ashcroft 100 Say She She 75 Scissor Sisters 120 Self Esteem 120 Skunk Anansie 100 Stereolab 120 The Streets 110 Super Furry Animals 110 Tems 20 Thundercat 90 Tom Jones 50 Tyler, the Creator 60 Underworld 115 Wet Leg 90 Wilco 85 The Wombats 80 Wolf Alice 140
    • Going with Oxfam.  Just booked my ferry today.  Looking forward!
    • The Radio Dept.?! That's a surprise to me, they haven't toured in like 8 years. Hopefully they will announce some more shows.
    • I was assuming September in Stirling might have a different issue tbf in the form of it just pissing it down.
    • Yeah so many of mine seem to be just France v Spain in one semi and England/Brazil v Argentina in the other. But the fact those combos are the obvious ones mean it feels unlikely that'll happen because in World Cup history, you very rarely end up with what pre-tournament looks like the obvious final 4. We all see teams outperform and underperform. Which one is the fall guy is a different matter.   I've said elsewhere that for me, there's a hierarchy of Spain, France and Argentina as the 3 strongest looking, then England and Portugal, then Brazil and Germany, but that overall, they'd be the 7 likeliest to win. So I dunno, maybe this will be the time the Netherlands avenge the failure of total football in 1974 and achieve what they couldn't achieve through whatever the f**k Nigel de Jong was with his 2010 final karate moves.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...