Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

To be fair I'm pretty sure @steviewevie was being ironic. He gets as annoyed about that stance as anyone here.

If anything, it was a bit too good. It sounded pretty much exactly the same as some people's real posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

15 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

Nah just cringeworthy calling people nerds and taking some sort of anti intellect stance on things.

Basic as fuck.

 Sanctimonious condescension is basic as fuck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW my Boss was in a meeting yesterday that included a couple of DfT people and they kept referring to the start of the (English) school holidays, which I think is 4 weeks away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MEGABOWL said:

FWIW my Boss was in a meeting yesterday that included a couple of DfT people and they kept referring to the start of the (English) school holidays, which I think is 4 weeks away.

5 weeks unfortunately...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Was clearly a mistake at the time and is one now. They need to reverse this ASAP.

The thing is will people want to take it now? I feel like it's been somewhat tarnished by being told it's not safe (even though it really is for the vast majority). Some might still take it, but I reckon most will just wait if they are not at high risk of covid.

I say this as someone under 40 who has had AZ (before the blood clot thing, but I still would have afterwards).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Down to 41% more transmissible now from 60%...

 

It's insane this, first 0%, then 40%, then 60% and now 41%, I appreciate estimating how much more transmissible each variant will be can never be an exact science but by publishing different figures every other day each source is just throwing themselves to the wolves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Havors said:

So because one in a million has a chance of a clot they chose to leave many more vulnerable to the virus for longer. Seems logical. 🤪

At least give people the choice but without shaming them if they decide not to take this this

Problem is that second bit isn't what's going to happen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

The thing is will people want to take it now? I feel like it's been somewhat tarnished by being told it's not safe (even though it really is for the vast majority). Some might still take it, but I reckon most will just wait if they are not at high risk of covid.

I say this as someone under 40 who has had AZ (before the blood clot thing, but I still would have afterwards).

Surely a fair few would, enough to make it worth it. First AZ wasn't recommended for the oldies across Europe etc but now it's that age group's main vaccine. I think a lot of people would just be glad to get any vaccine, especially if they know you're more likely to get a blood clot from the pill than the AZ vaccine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

The thing is will people want to take it now? I feel like it's been somewhat tarnished by being told it's not safe (even though it really is for the vast majority). Some might still take it, but I reckon most will just wait if they are not at high risk of covid.

I say this as someone under 40 who has had AZ (before the blood clot thing, but I still would have afterwards).

Getting my jab today, but if I was offered az I would walk out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, andyrhodes24 said:

Surely a fair few would, enough to make it worth it. First AZ wasn't recommended for the oldies across Europe etc but now it's that age group's main vaccine. I think a lot of people would just be glad to get any vaccine, especially if they know you're more likely to get a blood clot from the pill than the AZ vaccine

It's not just a regular blood clot - it's an extremely rare autoimmune reaction. But yes it's probably worth the risk to not get covid - I would take my chances not taking it if that was all that was available.but obviously that's personal choice 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Yeah, my kid was about to go on a skiing trip with school end of March last year, the privileged little shit, but that got canned. But I remember the day they closed her school because of covid and it was the happiest I had seen her for a long time.

Funny enough we felt like we had got our daughter "back" the day school was called off and she knew she would not be going back in until 6th form. Not to worry though the 13 year old daughter has taken that place and I have a 9 year old daughter lined up after her in the moody slot.

No wonder I love going to Glastonbury and going off grid for 5 days a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, efcfanwirral said:

It's not just a regular blood clot - it's an extremely rare autoimmune reaction. But yes it's probably worth the risk to not get covid - I would take my chances not taking it but obviously that's personal choice 

Ah I'm with you now. Completely hypothetical but you wonder what the response would be from those waiting to be vaccinated if we ran out of Pfizer tomorrow and it was AZ or bust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

I've had it and wasn't good but prefer that to blood clots.

 

6 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

This is a seriously dumb post. Absolutely mental actually. Are you trolling here?

Absolutely trolling (actually I'd say mocking is the word).

But I'm serious when I say I wouldn't  take AZ 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much work it would entail to create a separate booking page for under 40s and make explicitly clear at the outset that they are going to be having AZ? That obviously then enables people to have the choice, the government to get rid of an AZ stockpile, more jabs in arms but may logistically be hard to sort given the number of vaccination stations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, andyrhodes24 said:

Surely a fair few would, enough to make it worth it. First AZ wasn't recommended for the oldies across Europe etc but now it's that age group's main vaccine. I think a lot of people would just be glad to get any vaccine, especially if they know you're more likely to get a blood clot from the pill than the AZ vaccine

Yeah I would hope so. I guess the answer is just to open it up as an option to people if they want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Basement Jaxx 110 (-10) Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • What is too old for Leeds Fest now ?  I'm going to the Fontaines Saturday in a few weeks at 54 !!!  I may be the oldest there 🙂    Wythenshawe may be an option for WA.
    • Pretty much all festivals lose out on major artists because of production limitations though. Glastonbury is no different to most other festivals.  Lots of acts can/will adapt their tour production to suit festival stages if they want to play them, but some acts with stage designs and routines just don't want to adapt, and would rather just stick with a rigid, well-rehearsed production and take the money for their own gigs, whether that's a lot more than playing Glastonbury, or slightly less than playing some other festivals (but with added complications). Trying to adapt the stage, layout, access to b-stages etc to accommodate a single headliner on a Friday and then having to change it all around for a Saturday headliner isn't really a goer when most headliners can just easily adapt their show to stay on a main stage, if they're so inclined. They have a year to figure out how to perform a song on a main stage and ditch a few dance routines out on a b-stage if they really put their mind to it. It's not that difficult......
    • I would be all over Wolf Alice but may have outgrown this venue.    Also have to consider the schedule they have been on this year so may be on a break.  This last 10 days alone they did Tramlines, New York, Chicago and Kendal Calling.  Although make hay while the sun shines may come into play.
    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 (-10) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...