Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, zahidf said:

Sooner everyone realises UK and EU are in it together, the better off we will all be. Economy, holidays, suppressing new variants, all come from working together 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

When the foreign places have been vaccinated. The UK is way ahead of lots of Europe. They'll have largely caught up next year.

How far the European countries are behind is massively overstated.

They’ll catch up at the very end of the summer. They’re a few months behind, that’s all and the period they’ll be catching up is when case levels are low anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, xxialac said:

How far the European countries are behind is massively overstated.

They’ll catch up at the very end of the summer. They’re a few months behind, that’s all and the period they’ll be catching up is when case levels are low anyway.

I dunno. I think France will SERIOUS issues in getting most of their population Vaxxed. Its not just supply for them, but massive hesitancy. The French government are really screwing up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re; the summer holiday abroad thing on the BBC. Yes, no foreign travel is obviously the safest thing, but I don’t for one second think foreign holidays will be totally banned this summer. Not a chance imo. We’ll at least have some type of travel corridor arrangement or a red list scenario, if not more widely available travel. We know that countries (and apparently the UK is leading the charge) are looking at ways to make it safer with the vaccine passport stuff.

I get Europe are lagging behind, but if there’s very low cases in, say, Cyprus by the summer, they’ve vaccinated a fair number of people and we’ve vaccinated all our adults, it becomes very hard to justify to people why we can’t go there. I just don’t see a blanket ban on all holidays to all destinations as remotely likely, or even sensible given the travel industry as a whole would probably go under.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jparx said:

Re; the summer holiday abroad thing on the BBC. Yes, no foreign travel is obviously the safest thing, but I don’t for one second think foreign holidays will be totally banned this summer. Not a chance imo. We’ll at least have some type of travel corridor arrangement or a red list scenario, if not more widely available travel. We know that countries (and apparently the UK is leading the charge) are looking at ways to make it safer with the vaccine passport stuff.

I get Europe are lagging behind, but if there’s very low cases in, say, Cyprus by the summer, they’ve vaccinated a fair number of people and we’ve vaccinated all our adults, it becomes very hard to justify to people why we can’t go there. I just don’t see a blanket ban on all holidays to all destinations as remotely likely, or even sensible given the travel industry as a whole would probably go under.

I know it won't catch all of them but I do wonder if a mandatory test on the way back in could be a good plan? With any positives there going to the sequencing lab. Should at least help point us in the right direction to warn if something is happening 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

When the foreign places have been vaccinated. The UK is way ahead of lots of Europe. They'll have largely caught up next year.

If our population are vaccinated presumably the chance of them bringing back the virus are also low, in combination with vaccine rates increasing in Europe (slowly) and the summer coming.
 

I’m not saying it’s definitely the right call to allow travel, but we’ve got to ease the restrictions at some point and this summer seems a good point to consider it, to areas with low prevalence and ongoing vaccination programs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, efcfanwirral said:

I know it won't catch all of them but I do wonder if a mandatory test on the way back in could be a good plan? With any positives there going to the sequencing lab. Should at least help point us in the right direction to warn if something is happening 

Sounds a good idea to me. Could just do it at the airport before you go through passport control or something. There will be things in place to unlock overseas travel I’m absolutely certain. Throwing your arms up saying “variants” isn’t going to sit especially well with the public, and companies like Tui. Imagine if Greece has really low cases like last summer and they can’t fly people there because we’re worried about hypotheticals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jparx said:

Sounds a good idea to me. Could just do it at the airport before you go through passport control or something. There will be things in place to unlock overseas travel I’m absolutely certain. Throwing your arms up saying “variants” isn’t going to sit especially well with the public, and companies like Tui. Imagine if Greece has really low cases like last summer and they can’t fly people there because we’re worried about hypotheticals.

Yeah we just need to make sure we're not taken by surprise by variants if the worst does happen, say the Brazil one made it in and reduced effectiveness even a bit we could be quickly in trouble. I think we'll have a couple of "just in case" mini lockdowns at least over the next year around things like this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Yeah we just need to make sure we're not taken by surprise by variants if the worst does happen, say the Brazil one made it in and reduced effectiveness even a bit we could be quickly in trouble. I think we'll have a couple of "just in case" mini lockdowns at least over the next year around things like this 

There are going to be variants for the rest of time.... do we lockdown everytime theres a new one? A variant is still the same virus. 

Edited by Havors
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Havors said:

There are going to be variants for the rest of time.... do we lockdown everytime theres a new one? A variant is still the same virus. 

It depends on the variant - if one is particularly vaccine resistant then obviously you'd treat the rise of it differently 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Havors said:

There are going to be variants for the rest of time.... do we lockdown everytime theres a new one? A variant is still the same virus. 

I mean if they sequence it and find it gets past the vaccine- I don't think we should lock down again but I think we will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Havors said:

There are going to be variants for the rest of time.... do we lockdown everytime theres a new one? A variant is still the same virus. 

we're right at the start with vaccines though, eventually we'll be able to manufacture and rollout vaccine for whatever variant is dominant, but at moment we're not at that stage.

Also...how much can this virus mutate and become dominant, it's not infinite, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I like this metaphor :

 

 

I agree, a good metaphor but what does she mean by being sensible? Not going to crowded public spaces again? Permanent social distancing? Never hugging their grandkids again? Or just washing your hands and staying at home when you’re ill? 
 

if the vaccines can’t return us to normality then what is the alternative? Live/exist like this forever? No thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

And a bit more detail 

This is the one we need to keep out. So far we have PR campaigns saying the vaccines are effective against it, but not a real world test just yet. 

the other problem for Brazil is they have a nutcase in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So it's been 3 weeks since my 1st Pfizer jab, feeling a bit relieved tbh and hopefully the fella will get his in April all being well 🤞

With Europe and lets be honest the rest of the world, I do hope they catch up on their vaccination programmes as until we get global coverage of suppressing the risk with this vaccine, it's going to be hard to do anything normal as such... 

I do worry for Brazil as they have that nutter in charge that is just letting them die on the bloody streets 😞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

I mean if they sequence it and find it gets past the vaccine- I don't think we should lock down again but I think we will

I agree with that, we shouldn't but me may well. Makes no sense all this variant hyperbole. They are by all accounts variants that make them more infectious but they are ultimately he same virus.

Vaccines are not just there to stop you getting the virus persay they are predominantly to reduce the seriousness of any illness/death in the weak (which is already a tiny percentage I may add). Reduced infection is a bonus. 

We will find ourselves in the same position every winter that we did with the flu. New boosters or vaccines each winter for the elderly and vulnerable and life will go on. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

we're right at the start with vaccines though, eventually we'll be able to manufacture and rollout vaccine for whatever variant is dominant, but at moment we're not at that stage.

Also...how much can this virus mutate and become dominant, it's not infinite, right?

We certainly will have vaccines every year now or boosters. Its quite obvious even to the lay person. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

It depends on the variant - if one is particularly vaccine resistant then obviously you'd treat the rise of it differently 

When you say vaccine resistant though we are talkign about its ability to infect.. the vaccines will still reduce the seriousness of the illness if caught which is the main job of the vaccine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Havors said:

When you say vaccine resistant though we are talkign about its ability to infect.. the vaccines will still reduce the seriousness of the illness if caught which is the main job of the vaccine. 

do we actually know this yet? that vaccines we have will be just as effective in reducing chance of serious illness or death for any variant?

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

do we actually know this yet? that vaccine we have will be just as effective in reducing chance of seriousness illness or death for any variant?

Well thats the premise. The virus is still covid 19... until it mutates and becomes a different virus?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...