Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, gizmoman said:

World wide rally for freedom & democracy,

 

 

 

 

So it’s likely to be everyone that has protested for some reason over the last year ... some reasons I fall more in line with and can justify better in my head than others ... 

Edited by crazyfool1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr.Tease said:

It is a perfectly valid argument, but does it have to be made in the "data not dates" way EVERY day? We're not able to change policy, you're lobbying the wrong people! 

Oh I don't the make the argument EVERY time. But this is the thread to comment on that aspect of things 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

So it’s likely to be everyone that has protested for some reason over the summer ... some reasons I fall more in line with and can justify better in my head than others ... 

the anti lockdown knobs are hijacking the reclaim the streets and now the kill the bill thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

So it’s likely to be everyone that has protested for some reason over the summer ... some reasons I fall more in line with and can justify better in my head than others ... 

Stuff like this concerns me a bit- whips people up for various reasons, no clear aim, likely starting online and becoming a bit of a movement but with no clear organisers. If some agitators were sent in there to make it kick off it would conveniently give a lot of ammunition to the government to push this bill through with some more public support 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

the anti lockdown knobs are hijacking the reclaim the streets and now the kill the bill thing.

Yeah that’s the issue ... can’t abide the anti maskers and anti Vaxers either ... the other causes have decent justification based on long standing issues ... that will likely be issues for some time to come ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr.Tease said:

I don't really understand this internet thing of being proud or happy if someone finds something you're doing a bit tedious. sure, don't care or keep doing it anyway, but I'm not sure how it counts as a win, we're not in competition, you're not my arch nemesis, we just disagree on things! 

Ah I’m only playing. Like you say we just disagree.

To be honest this is my only sounding board for how I feel about it all so I probably vocalise how I feel about it more than perhaps others do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, crazyfool1 said:

Yeah that’s the issue ... can’t abide the anti maskers and anti Vaxers either ... the other causes have decent justification based on long standing issues ... that will likely be issues for some time to come ... 

my daughter says she is going to a reclaim the streets type demo. She doesn't really know much, just her friends are going, so she wants to. I could tell her she's not allowed, but she'd just say bollocks and go anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's fair to be frustrated with the cautious pace of the easing of restrictions after such a long time and seeing how well things are going. At same time I understand how they really want to make sure there are no need to reimpose restrictions at any time if things go tits up, so are being extra careful. We're doing good, just think need to be patient.

God I'm so reasonable. Centrist dad.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

Something to consider is the fact we are currently muzzling the kids all day long (and causing all sorts of behavioural and mental health problems) and there is a review of this at Easter.

IF they decide the children don't have to wear muzzles at the start of next term - there will be another nervous wait to see if that has an impact. 

Obviously it will because magic masks are the solutions to everything 😛 

There is NO chance the government are going to go quicker than the roadmap.

You are naomi wolf and I claim my five pounds.

20210319_172721.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

I also have a wife working daily in schools dealing with the real world issues coming out of it.  Pretend it doesn't exist but it does.  The kids are miserable and its causing issue.  Teaching in a mask all day is a nightmare as well.

Praying they stop it come Easter.

I saw some kids walking around in masks on their way home from school today. It's mental that they're brainwashed enough to think that's needed. Just make school normal for them, it'll have to be in the future so why not now? 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reopening of schools on 8th March was a brilliant decision I think. It gave them 3 weeks to monitor closely the trajectory of positive cases in the three weeks up to Easter, then another two weeks breathing space over the holidays to monitor how things are. The key to lockdown will be that first Covid test (hopefully this will be done formally within school so the results can be properly monitored). The week coming up is also key, before the kids break up. That will give a clear indication of the direction the cases are heading. And allow them to loosen restrictions further if there is still no significant rise in cases within schools, or tighten them further if there is. We are hopefully on the home straight now, and they/we don't want to blow it now by loosening restrictions a bit too early. Easter holidays gives them that breathing space/circuit breaker to properly assess where we are heading. At the moment it all looks like going in the right directions, including within schools, fingers crossed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, dingbat2 said:

The reopening of schools on 8th March was a brilliant decision I think. It gave them 3 weeks to monitor closely the trajectory of positive cases in the three weeks up to Easter, then another two weeks breathing space over the holidays to monitor how things are. The key to lockdown will be that first Covid test (hopefully this will be done formally within school so the results can be properly monitored). The week coming up is also key, before the kids break up. That will give a clear indication of the direction the cases are heading. And allow them to loosen restrictions further if there is still no significant rise in cases within schools, or tighten them further if there is. We are hopefully on the home straight now, and they/we don't want to blow it now by loosening restrictions a bit too early. Easter holidays gives them that breathing space/circuit breaker to properly assess where we are heading. At the moment it all looks like going in the right directions, including within schools, fingers crossed

Definitely positive. Week 2 of schools being open and cases still going down when a lot of Europe is going the other way. 

Really important to get things as low as reasonably possible before opening up the things we know do push R above 1. 

So should anything push us off track there is plenty of contingency room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JoeyT said:

Ah I’m only playing. Like you say we just disagree.

To be honest this is my only sounding board for how I feel about it all so I probably vocalise how I feel about it more than perhaps others do.

I mainly end up looking at this thread when I'm feeling annoyed- this is probably not the best combination!😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Merkel says that she has to pull the emergency brake for Germany with the third wave NOW and the only way out of this is to „vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate“ blabiabla. Austrians Chancelor Kurz sees the last few meters of the pandemic blablabla. I wonder what is going on in those minds, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaccination prevent future waves, the only way to suppress current waves is by strict lockdowns. Vaccines take 3 weeks to take effect and only if a significant proportion of the at risk population are vaccinated really quickly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, dingbat2 said:

Vaccination prevent future waves, the only way to suppress current waves is by strict lockdowns. Vaccines take 3 weeks to take effect and only if a significant proportion of the at risk population are vaccinated really quickly

Hopefully as we start to move more into the working age of the population, we'll see the natural R number of the virus drop lower and lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Hopefully as we start to move more into the working age of the population, we'll see the natural R number of the virus drop lower and lower.

Yes absolutely true Stu2H. My comment was really a response to our Austrian friend's reference to what Mrs M said, vaccination won't get Germany out of their immediate crisis, only a strict kickdown will get their cases down now. Vaccination will only prevent or reduce the impact of any future waves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...