Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, xxialac said:

I live in a curfew country.

It seems to be working and above all stops young people congregating and drinking, which is an obvious cause of the spread.

They've got cases down to 12,000.

Curfew doesn't infringe my civil liberties given it's for a very valid reason during a global pandemic.

You probably have police who are mildly respected and have reasonable numbers? Or if not a population who understands why these measures are in place and not just a set of rules governing their lives 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

you work at a primary school?

Yeah I do with 4-7 year olds, it's all well and good saying the children are fine but what about the staff/families of the children who could be adversely affected if someone caught the virus within the setting, its such a hard balance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, efcfanwirral said:

You probably have police who are mildly respected and have reasonable numbers? Or if not a population who understands why these measures are in place and not just a set of rules governing their lives 

Admittedly, that's true on both points. But then they aren't governed by a bunch of spoilt children. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chapple12345 said:

Yeah I do with 4-7 year olds, it's all well and good saying the children are fine but what about the staff/families of the children who could be adversely affected if someone caught the virus within the setting, its such a hard balance 

It's a nightmare to balance and it's shit because it could probably have been avoided if the virus hadn't got so out of control.

I'm really worried about my friend who is extremely vulnerable getting covid from her kids going back to school. But equally worried about the kids not getting their education. It's such a tough one. And that's even without considering the teachers or the general spread, that's just one example of one family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, crazyfool1 said:

Is there anyway someone in another country can order it for you and send it on ... pain in the ass way of doing it .. but might be a way to go if things become desperate ?!! 

Exactly what I'll be doing, Germany to South Yorkshire via Dubai or Hungary.

Its not desperate but it has caused some dissapointment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

You probably have police who are mildly respected and have reasonable numbers? Or if not a population who understands why these measures are in place and not just a set of rules governing their lives 

so lack of movement like we had in lockdown 1 ?  I remember empty motorways and roads then .... we have the same people in play who have probably lost interest .... so yes that needs to be changed .... but it is enforceable because so few people should be out and about and the police arent dealing with other things 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

So could we actually switch over to manufacturing a vaccine for a different variant in 4-6 weeks, from sequencing to putting in a vial?

From what I understand, the actual development in the lab could be done within a couple of days?

Oh yeah, switching the sequence is a doddle, could do it overnight, would need to run some tests on it to see that it is performing the same way the old one did at that stage and then move ahead to scaling up. The nice thing is that the change being incorporated is a natural one that has evolved, rather than a tweak designed in the lab that is predicted to work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toilet Duck said:

Oh yeah, switching the sequence is a doddle, could do it overnight, would need to run some tests on it to see that it is performing the same way the old one did at that stage and then move ahead to scaling up. The nice thing is that the change being incorporated is a natural one that has evolved, rather than a tweak designed in the lab that is predicted to work. 

Do you think it unlikely that a strain could completely evade a vaccine to make it useless, and would instead effect effacy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

It's a nightmare to balance and it's shit because it could probably have been avoided if the virus hadn't got so out of control.

I'm really worried about my friend who is extremely vulnerable getting covid from her kids going back to school. But equally worried about the kids not getting their education. It's such a tough one. And that's even without considering the teachers or the general spread, that's just one example of one family.

This is the exact issue every single school in the country is facing and an awful balance to try, I do think schools will be told to shut within the next 2 weeks anyway so sending them back and then sending them off again almost instantly is very damaging anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, zahidf said:

Do you think it unlikely that a strain could completely evade a vaccine to make it useless, and would instead effect effacy?

I think a change that renders the vaccines useless completely changes the virus and it would more than likely no longer bind to the ACE receptor. So, there’s very little pressure for selecting such an alteration. Accumulated changes in the spike may evade some of the antibodies produced in response to the vaccine, but not all of them. Could have implications for the antibody therapies, but cocktails should still work (not that these are being widely used at the moment anyway). We could always pop a nucleocapsid sequence into later vaccines too since our immune system also targets this (and this isn’t drifting as fast as the spike is). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

Yeah I do with 4-7 year olds, it's all well and good saying the children are fine but what about the staff/families of the children who could be adversely affected if someone caught the virus within the setting, its such a hard balance 

yeah, and bigger picture is just leads to more people being infected, as it seems that new variant is spreading more amongst children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

This is the exact issue every single school in the country is facing and an awful balance to try, I do think schools will be told to shut within the next 2 weeks anyway so sending them back and then sending them off again almost instantly is very damaging anyway 

Yeah, my sister works in a primary school in York and their headteacher has sent a letter out to all parents saying that the school will probably not open but can't say for sure yet. What a farce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a counterpoint to the rapid growth due to the new variant narrative, Ireland has gone from the lowest case numbers in Europe to the fastest growing in the space of two weeks. Sequencing surveillance as well as spike gene drop out PCR data suggests the new variant only accounts for about 10% of cases here. So explosive growth with the old variant still possible when social interaction increases (we were stable til hospitality reopened and Christmas socialising kicked in). Still can’t say for sure that the new variant is entirely behind the explosion in cases, as mentioned above, probably prudent to assume it is more transmissible until we know better, but if cases are out of control, it’s almost immaterial what variant is behind it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

'Totally Back to Normal' absolutely will be. It depends on what normal is classified as anyway at that point, as the longer it stretches on - then things will never just flip back over. WFH is now here to stay for instance.

 

J1wL.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

 We could always pop a nucleocapsid sequence into later vaccines too since our immune system also targets this (and this isn’t drifting as fast as the spike is). 

 

5 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Tell me more!

Summer Loving Remix 2021

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stuartbert two hats said:

Tell me more!

So, the spike is a really obvious target for our immune system, it’s sticking up very prominently on the outside of the virus. But the other part of the outside of the virus is the nucleocapsid. This is the protein shell in which the viral RNA is encapsulated. When we look at the range of antibodies our immune system produces after natural infection, there are antibodies to the spike and also antibodies to the nucleocapsid. In fact, these nucleocapsid antibodies are what Pfizer will measure at a later date to get a readout of sterilising immunity from their vaccine (as they could only arise through natural infection, rather than vaccination...if vaccinated individuals have fewer nucleocapsid antibodies compared to controls, then the vaccine prevents infection!). Everybody designed their vaccines using the spike, but antibodies against the nucleocapsid forms part of our immune response to natural infection. A live attenuated or whole killed vaccine would stimulate a more natural immune response and some believe could facilitate sterilising immunity if delivered intra-nasally. There’s still lots of places to go in terms of vaccine development, but the first batch we have are a great start! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

This is the exact issue every single school in the country is facing and an awful balance to try, I do think schools will be told to shut within the next 2 weeks anyway so sending them back and then sending them off again almost instantly is very damaging anyway 

Yep I agree. And I think plenty of kids will be told to self isolate before that happens so further disruption even ahead of closures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...