Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

BMJ  and public health England rebuking that New York Times Article. 

"Ms Godlee said the paper's report was "seriously misleading and requires urgent correction".

She said the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) does not make any recommendation to mix and match."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-55519042

 

Clarifies that only if the first dose is unknown would a different vaccine potentially be given. Also in "extremely rare" cases where it is unavailable.

 

I imagine it will be rare because they should know in advance what day they're booking people in for so can plan to have stock of whichever vaccine in for those people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
9 hours ago, mcshed said:

whilst the SNP would have the power to bring the government down they'd never really want to be seen as doing it. 

except of course just a year ago they brought the govt down to bring about a massive tory victory. Also something they have form for in the past too.

For the SNP a tory govt in Westminster is better than a Labour govt in Westminster.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

except of course just a year ago they brought the govt down to bring about a massive tory victory. Also something they have form for in the past too.

For the SNP a tory govt in Westminster is better than a Labour govt in Westminster.

There is a difference between bringing down a Tory government and bringing down a Labour one, even if by bringing down the Tory one you allow them to make massive gains. Last December they also had the support of the Lib Dems and after the fact backing from Labour to avoid accusations of cowardice. Voting down a Labour Queen's Speech would be very different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

perhaps, but they've been happy to help do both in the past.

As I said the Labour minority government wouldn't necessarily last a full term and the SNP would certainly be looking for issues on which they could kick up a fuss without angering their base but I really don't think they could take the Scottish public with them when not allowing a Labour PM to replace a Tory one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Me too.  Reckon they must have more this year.   Not bad is it - ended up paying same price as this year.  It still represents great value for me.  Well, until I check my bank account the Monday after the weekend.
    • Well mayors have more powers to do that sh*t...but they have to make the numbers add up.
    • We'll see. Bristol and Leeds are both massively overdue big public transport investment - 2 of the cities with the worst transport infrastructure per capita in Western Europe. If this works to help support investment projects great and fair play to Burnham.
    • The Bródy Day was his idea because Sziget has always been late when it comes to this kind of concert. They would only organize farewell performances or tribute shows after an artist had passed away. Since Bródy is one of the country's greatest singer-songwriters, they wanted to honor him while he is still alive. (He didn't say it exactly like that, but the man is 80 and has just stopped playing large concerts.) He never understood why anyone would focus exclusively on one generation, especially Gen Z, who have less disposable income, drink less, and are, in his words, "afraid of partying." He explained that in the past, people loved festivals because of the nonstop partying, whereas many younger people today find that experience overwhelming or exhausting. That's one of the reasons why Sziget will introduce more chill zones and sensory-friendly spaces. They also want to attract older generations, who are generally more willing and able to spend money. The Sziget Icons days are aimed at this audience, and in the future they hope to create a more balanced lineup that appeals to people over 35 as well.   It was a long interview. If anything else comes to mind, I'll share it.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...