Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

If it's not safe for teachers what industries is it not safe for? Becomes a very slippery slope.Β 

All of them where social distancing and masks aren't practical.

Anyway, it's not the start of a slippery slope, it's the bottom. There's not a lot left to close that's not involved in supporting life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Andre91 said:

Not even sure if anyone cares or even reads the postsΒ I’ve been making over the last few days with regard to returning to school (secondary) this week but I have an update:Β 
Β 

Remote learning at my school consists of all teaching staff being in all this coming week and streaming from within school because, from what I’ve been told by someone who’s partner is on SMT, SMT collectively can’t be bothered to sort all of the key worker / vulnerable children into pods as they did back in the summer, so all of those students are following their normal timetable, in normal classrooms, so all staff need to be in their usual rooms all week in case there are any children in there, and then teach/stream the lesson from in school. So we will likely be looking at a minimum of zero and a maximum of 2 students in class and then the rest at home.Β 
Β 

150+ teaching staff coming in all week, along with the 100+ key worker/vulnerable children, when the whole point of pushing back the start of term was to reduce the amount of people in school. It is maddening. We have the technology at our fingertips at home;Β 150+ staff should not all coming in this week.Β 
Β 

I wondered earlier in the week if this was a compulsory thing for all schools moving into this coming week, however, it is not (the school one of my mate’s teaches atΒ aren't, my collegue’s sister’s school aren’tΒ and another colleague’sΒ children’s school aren’t).Β 

I very much care,Β  so thanks. My kid is year 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, xxialac said:

This is an INCREDIBLE read.

By way of comparisonΒ flewΒ into the UK 7Β times lastΒ year post covid.

Not once didΒ anyone askΒ to see my passenger locator form (let alone the rest).

Reading that, you realise why we're doomed- our governments would never think of doing any of that, and even if they did, are so hapless they could never pull it off.Β 

Instead we have stuff like 'eat out to help out'- it's beyond ridiculous, it's like we set out to see how bad we could make this.

Edited by Mr.Tease
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stuartbert two hats said:

All of them where social distancing and masks aren't practical.

Anyway, it's not the start of a slippery slope, it's the bottom. There's not a lot left to close that's not involved in supporting life.

all these click and collect services for starters .... the auction centre next door to me .... the firework shop ... all stops people making non essential journeysΒ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Irrespective of her other views - she's not wrong though.

People like her went from "don't do anything" at the start of the disaster, and eventually pivoted to "nothing can be done"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

are they going to make this a teachers vs the people thing?

Probably, if teachers listen to the unions and don’t go in, the government will vilify the whole profession I’m sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

Β 

That's an incredible and sobering table. Remind me, how much doesΒ a vaccine actually cost (ignoring availability of that vaccine)

Unless I am misreading the table, that cost of vaccine * 20 is the cost to us to save oneΒ persons life if they are in care home (assuming infinite availability of vaccine which I know we don't have)

Crumbs, that's frightening, we really need to focus on the availability, and administering,Β of the vaccine

Edited by dingbat2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dingbat2 said:

That's an incredible and sobering table. Remind me, how much doesΒ a vaccine actually cost (ignoring availability of that vaccine)

Unless I am misreading the table, that cost of vaccine * 20 is the cost to us to save oneΒ persons life if they are in care home (assuming infinite availability of vaccine which I know we don't have)

Crumbs, that's frightening, we really need to focus on the availability of the vaccine

The cost of each vaccine varies wildly and isn't as simple as a defined price.

Off the top of my head (Google will get you exact numbers) the often quoted list prices have Oxford/AZ at the low end for around $4 a shot, Moderna is at the high end at around $35 a shot (so double those for 2 doses). But obviously list prices can be negotiated when you're talking about quantities in the millions.

Even the negotiated prices likely won't reflect what the UK Government ultimately ends up paying at least for some of them - for example in the case of the Oxford/AZ vaccine (and a couple others that are potentially on the horizon), the deal goes beyond a simple purchase agreement - the government have underwritten, guaranteed, or directly taken out contracts with commercial contract manufacturers to reserve significant capacity (Wockhardt and others for the Oxford/AZ vaccine, Fujifilm Diosynth for the Novavax vaccine) as a way of ensuring both that the manufacturing can take place in the UK theoretically unimpeded and also that any supplies manufactured go to the UK first before being offered for sale abroad. Contracts like those will significantly add to the cost and as best I can tell the way they're structured means the actual effective cost per dose likely won't be known until the dust settles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, RobertProsineckisLighter said:

Irrespective of her other views - she's not wrong though.

The headline is "Trying to lock down until Covid is eradicated would be dangerous folly".

Nobody has suggested that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mates just got her email from the union advising her not to go into work.Β 

Schools have to be asked to close by the government though otherwise the teachers aren’t getting paid. They are effectively taking strike action by not going in.Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

My mates just got her email from the union advising her not to go into work.Β 

Schools have to be asked to close by the government though otherwise the teachers aren’t getting paid. They are effectively taking strike action by not going in.Β 

Legal minefield right there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

My mates just got her email from the union advising her not to go into work.Β 

Schools have to be asked to close by the government though otherwise the teachers aren’t getting paid. They are effectively taking strike action by not going in.Β 

People are saying it'sΒ  section 44 of the employment act that allows it.

https://labourlist.org/2020/05/returning-to-work-section-44-explained

Β 

Β 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853 Β  Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago. Β  2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump. Β  3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027." Β  4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it." Β  5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed. Β  6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon. Β  7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slotΒ 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...