Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mattiloy said:

don't know if anybody mentioned this one thats been doing the rounds from have i got news for you some days ago.

usually i'm all for comedy reaching into uncomfortable places, even if something close to my heart is the butt of the joke, but this guy jokes that he would see glastonbury bombed on account of its full of corbyn and bob dylan fans...

i found it hard to believe the bbc didn't edit it out?

it was shocking, but not witty, or funny at all really. & given in recent years there has been a pattern of attacks against for example the bataclan, the MEN and other large events - not to mention attacks by fascists on the left - utoya in norway, jo cox etc. i'd be lying if i said that it had never crossed my mind that glastonbury would presumably be a good target for terrorists. maybe it is just because its closer to home but i thought it was extremely poor taste. and even worse that nobody challenged him, including labour peer joan bakewell.
 

 

It came from a comedian. 

We don't impose the same expectations on comedians - the very nature of their job is to make jokes that are in bad taste.  They are a safe outlet for us breaking taboos. Frankie Boyle etc have said things over the years that are no different.

"it was shocking, but not witty, or funny at all really."

Are you saying if it was funny, it would have been ok? That's the implication. I'm sure he tried  for it to be funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

All true. I think my parents would understand if we made the call not to see them. My partner's parents, particularly his mum, will be more of an issue I feel!

How long would the walk take!? 👻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

How many on here are actually planning not to see family at all over Christmas, out of interest? @crazyfool1 and @Ozanne but anyone else? Or are people waiting to see what happens?

We’re lucky enough to be within walking distance from my parents so will see them outside/from a distance in the morning and then come home for a relaxed day. The in-laws are a bit further away so will have to see what happens regarding household mixing for them. If it’s not allowed, mother-in-law will be livid but safety has to come first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

How many on here are actually planning not to see family at all over Christmas, out of interest? @crazyfool1 and @Ozanne but anyone else? Or are people waiting to see what happens?

We still haven't decided in our family but our likliest plan will be seeing family by dropping presents and food on their doorstep rather than entering their house, my grandparents are in poor health at the moment but would appreciate a visit so we're going for a compromise of seeing them at a distance and then returning home afterwards, we may then see other members of the family for a walk such as on Boxing Day but we plan to see what restrictions and cases allow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

With all the positve vaccine news, plus other medical break throughs, making it likely life will start to return to normal throughout 2021, makes it somewhat easier to put off seeing family over christmas....in my opinion.

yep   exactly and my decision is absolutely based on this ... without vaccine news it may well have been different 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mattiloy said:

don't know if anybody mentioned this one thats been doing the rounds from have i got news for you some days ago.

usually i'm all for comedy reaching into uncomfortable places, even if something close to my heart is the butt of the joke, but this guy jokes that he would see glastonbury bombed on account of its full of corbyn and bob dylan fans...

i found it hard to believe the bbc didn't edit it out?

it was shocking, but not witty, or funny at all really. & given in recent years there has been a pattern of attacks against for example the bataclan, the MEN and other large events - not to mention attacks by fascists on the left - utoya in norway, jo cox etc. i'd be lying if i said that it had never crossed my mind that glastonbury would presumably be a good target for terrorists. maybe it is just because its closer to home but i thought it was extremely poor taste. and even worse that nobody challenged him, including labour peer joan bakewell.
 

 

It was a shit joke. Barely even a joke. And from the little I've seen of Fin Taylor before, about standard. He's not very good. But 'shocking', 'proposed murder'. Behave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gregfc15 said:

The spread of COVID was initially supercharged by the mass movement of people at Chinese/lunar new year. It doesn't take an epidemiologist to see how this will end. The government have learnt literally nothing in 10 months.

Completely agreed. 2nd December onwards is going to be a grim couple of months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how does this tie in in with all the 'entire population vaccinated by March' projections?

"UK mass vaccination scheme 'could be in place by summer,' SAGE scientists says"

“The rest of the population, I think, will be looking towards the summer before this mass vaccination of the rest of the population and that will give us the immunity, the broad immunity, that allows us to return back to normal.

“Having said that, there is still going to be vulnerable people and we will need to take care.”

He also suggested that if the vaccine scheme was in place we might see an end of some of the social distancing restrictions by the summer.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/uk-mass-vaccination-scheme-could-23048897

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Copperface said:

So how does this tie in in with all the 'entire population vaccinated by March' projections?

"UK mass vaccination scheme 'could be in place by summer,' SAGE scientists says"

“The rest of the population, I think, will be looking towards the summer before this mass vaccination of the rest of the population and that will give us the immunity, the broad immunity, that allows us to return back to normal.

“Having said that, there is still going to be vulnerable people and we will need to take care.”

He also suggested that if the vaccine scheme was in place we might see an end of some of the social distancing restrictions by the summer.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/uk-mass-vaccination-scheme-could-23048897

I think mass vaccination by summer is more realistic...but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

How many on here are actually planning not to see family at all over Christmas, out of interest? @crazyfool1 and @Ozanne but anyone else? Or are people waiting to see what happens?

I won't. There's a good chance I'll be working anyway but even if I'm not I probably won't go. If we are back open then I encounter so many people in my working day that I wouldn't want to risk it for a day that isn't that important to either of us after being so careful for so long

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

With all the positve vaccine news, plus other medical break throughs, making it likely life will start to return to normal throughout 2021, makes it somewhat easier to put off seeing family over christmas....in my opinion.

Yeah I agree with this. That's how I see it. Just not sure our families will agree! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Chapple12345 said:

We still haven't decided in our family but our likliest plan will be seeing family by dropping presents and food on their doorstep rather than entering their house, my grandparents are in poor health at the moment but would appreciate a visit so we're going for a compromise of seeing them at a distance and then returning home afterwards, we may then see other members of the family for a walk such as on Boxing Day but we plan to see what restrictions and cases allow 

This sounds sensible. If we could easily get there and back in a day and meet outside I would probably do something similar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

How many on here are actually planning not to see family at all over Christmas, out of interest? @crazyfool1 and @Ozanne but anyone else? Or are people waiting to see what happens?

Me. My parents, brothers family and I decided months ago that we would not spend this Christmas together. We all believe it is a risk just not worth taking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, philipsteak said:

I won't. There's a good chance I'll be working anyway but even if I'm not I probably won't go. If we are back open then I encounter so many people in my working day that I wouldn't want to risk it for a day that isn't that important to either of us after being so careful for so long

Yeah makes sense. If I did a job that meant I met a lot of people I would definitely avoid seeing family for Christmas personally. It's the fact that I don't actually entail that much risk that makes it a tougher one for me to call! Logistics really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

Yeah I agree with this. That's how I see it. Just not sure our families will agree! 

this is the issue .... and something im struggling to bring up in discussions with family ..... my brother has moved from fire brigade  to working on ambulances and has dealt with a few covid cases of late .... im hoping his common sense prevails but im struggling for how to deal with such an emotive subject ... I know my folks will be wanting to see the grandchildren ... so bloody tough ... im yet to know if im worrying about nothing though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazyfool1 said:

this is the issue .... and something im struggling to bring up in discussions with family ..... my brother has moved from fire brigade  to working on ambulances and has dealt with a few covid cases of late .... im hoping his common sense prevails but im struggling for how to deal with such an emotive subject ... I know my folks will be wanting to see the grandchildren ... so bloody tough ... im yet to know if im worrying about nothing though 

Yeah that is tough. We've avoided having conversations too directly about it so far, "just see what happens" kind of thing, but am just thinking today that the announcement tomorrow might mean we have to address it sooner rather than later!

Thanks for the input all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

How many on here are actually planning not to see family at all over Christmas, out of interest? @crazyfool1 and @Ozanne but anyone else? Or are people waiting to see what happens?

Rules permitting, we'll be hosting family this year.  We'd normally go away to avoid all that stuff - hosting people at my home is my day job! -  so this year is a strange reversal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...