Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
10 hours ago, Mark E. Spliff said:

Apologies - passive aggressive tit-for-tat is way too tempting in an online handbag-battle.  For what it's worth, I don't think there was much danger of me convincing anyone you were on the far right.

Meanwhile, back at where we started, your attack included wording that can be rightfully regarded as an attack on the very idea of a state of Israel*. So it's no surprise that attacks like yours get called out as AS.

(* 'the very idea of Israel' is no different to 'the very idea of France' or Germany, or the UK. Ultimately their right to exist comes from their existence).

Because: zionism has no relevance to the actions of the Israeli govt. The Israeli govt are responsible for the Israeli govt, not zionism.

(and a claim of them acting for full-on zionism can be dismissed by the fact of past Israeli withdrawal from lands zionism lays claim to).

If you'd like to avoid verbal attacks on the actions of Israel being called out as AS, it's very easy and lets the Israeli's off nothing at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

my part of Bristol is currently showing as having a covid rate 1,050 per 100,000 on the covid interactive map. :blink: 

From clicking around it appears to be the highest rate in Bristol. It also appears to be higher than anywhere in Manc or Liverpool.

Does anyone know of anywhere with a higher rate?

 

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

my part of Bristol is currently showing as having a covid rate 1,050 per 100,000 on the covid interactive map. :blink: 

From clicking around it appears to be the highest rate in Bristol. It also appears to be higher than anywhere in Manc or Liverpool.

Does anyone know of anywhere with a higher rate?

 

Where is that?

I thought city centre was the highest last time I looked but assume that’s changed now.

Bishopston was also pretty high if I remember rightly.

I’m in Keynsham so in an odd position where we are BANES but work across Bristol and South Glos so might find I can’t actually go to work when we go back to a tiered system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

but Bishopsworth is very high. Higher than me. 1,314. :blink: 

Is that on the rise of decline? Matt Hancock implied yesterday we were at the peak, if places are still rising then he might not be correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
3 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Is that on the rise of decline? Matt Hancock implied yesterday we were at the peak, if places are still rising then he might not be correct. 

from what's on the map it's saying a 60% increase in the previous 7 days for Bishopsworth - tho the data on the map is currently only up-to 15th Nov, so it might have fallen since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, Homer said:

Andy Burnham is on BBC1. Is saying in future to make restrictions “evidence-based” (wild idea). Particularly shouted for gyms to reopen and the 10pm curfew to be scrapped (after the lockdown ends).

and yet there's no better evidence for gyms being safe than there is anything else. 

Everything tries to claim itself as safe, on the basis of having implemented the anti-covid rules. If they were as safe as they want to think themselves there'd be no current high rates of covid.

 

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

and yet there's no better evidence for gyms being safe than there is anything else. 

Everything tries to claim itself as safe, on the basis of having implemented the anti-covid rules. If they were as safe as they want to think themselves there'd be no current high rates of covid.

 

I thought that despite gyms seeming like they would be a hot bed of infection, there have been very few outbreaks linked to gyms. We do have quite a lot of evidence at this point, don't we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

from what's on the map it's saying a 60% increase in the previous 7 days for Bishopsworth - tho the data on the map is currently only up-to 15th Nov, so it might have fallen since then.

The government site says Bristol in general is up 83% (1,650 cases) up to Nov 20th so looks like they are still rising. I’m not entirely convinced we are at the plateau across the country Hancock says we are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I thought that despite gyms seeming like they would be a hot bed of infection, there have been very few outbreaks linked to gyms. We do have quite a lot of evidence at this point, don't we?

and pubs say there's very few outbreaks linked to in pubs, and until the new lockdown there were very few outbreaks linked to supermarkets.

The reality is: the more contacts you allow people, the more outbreaks there are. And a gym is a place of contact just like a pub and just like a supermarket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
11 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

The government site says Bristol in general is up 83% (1,650 cases) up to Nov 20th so looks like they are still rising. I’m not entirely convinced we are at the plateau across the country Hancock says we are. 

Bristol started it's rise a fair bit later (not until October, when students came back) than other 'big' places such as Liverpool and Manc, so it's lagging a bit behind.

The student areas are now falling back, but the students have spread it to the rest of the population so those areas are generally still rising.

Fingers crossed it'll start to fall back everywhere in Bristol in the next week or so.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Bristol started it's rise a fair bit later (not until October, when students came back) than other 'big' places such as Liverpool and Manc, so it's lagging a bit behind.

The student areas are now falling back, but the students have spread it to the rest of the population so those areas are generally still rising.

Fingers crossed it'll start to fall back everywhere in Bristol in the next week or so.

We could be in the same position that areas of the north were in the first lockdown, relax it too early etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, Homer said:

I guess at least with gyms there is also a tangible health benefit 

gyms are really just a convenient way of getting a health benefit.

The health benefit can be got without needing gyms, so I don't really think they deserve special consideration on that basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

gyms are really just a convenient way of getting a health benefit.

The health benefit can be got without needing gyms, so I don't really think they deserve special consideration on that basis.

Have to disagree there. Have you ever tried working out outside in the freezing pissing down rain or snow?  The health benefits of gyms are massive, not just physically but mentally. Gyms offer much better forms of exercise than you can get outside on your own or in the house, not to mention the mental well being from getting to the gym 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Meanwhile...

I think you intended to alternate your points with quotes from me?  I'll respond as best I can:

I presume you were intending to quote me from our last debate back in June where I accepted I was biased against the state of Israel?  That was my open and honest confession that my jaded views on the Israeli state means I am susceptible to bullshit stories about it, just as Maxine Peake was.  We're all biased against lots of things - it doesn't mean that I question their right to exist.  I'm a pragmatist when it comes to Israel/Palestine.  The best solution is whatever produces a long-term, just, settlement.  Getting rid of Israel is the diametric opposite of that - i.e. it would be World War 3.

I genuinely don't know what you could have been quoting me on regarding the Israeli Govt. and Zionism.  I despise the current Israeli Govt but they're supposedly secular and I wouldn't have been accusing them of being Zionist.  They do use Zionists as pawns in the bigger political game - i.e. giving the green light to their illegal settlements.

I don't understand your last sentence out of context.  Yes, I think it's a dangerous situation when debate about the Israel/Palestine situation is being silenced by claims of antisemitism, however that won't stop me from wading through that treacle.  My point throughout this discussion is that I think Labour should have had the balls to do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

The government site says Bristol in general is up 83% (1,650 cases) up to Nov 20th so looks like they are still rising. I’m not entirely convinced we are at the plateau across the country Hancock says we are. 

I guess his point is that at the nationwide level, cases are falling. There will be some areas where they're rising still, but on average they're falling. I'm convinced the lockdown will be replaced with a stricter tier system where indoor household mixing is banned across the country and some areas (e.g. Bristol) remain in lockdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

gyms are really just a convenient way of getting a health benefit.

The health benefit can be got without needing gyms, so I don't really think they deserve special consideration on that basis.

My bath isn’t conducive to swimming ... I don’t know quite how it do 2k in that ? ... understand the general point but my gym closing has stopped my exercise altogether ... badminton outside isn’t much kop either ... so my exercise has stopped for a month 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...