Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

TBAs 2019


Tuna

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, fightoffyour said:

Everything Everything could be drafted in to headline JP if Diplo did cancel. Just doing Latitude so “active” but apparently exclusive, for what it’s worth (not much).

Not sure Jeremy would do the Park with Foals and then play a full set with EE a couple of hours later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tom_12 said:

According to Annie Mac’s Instagram she’s playing Glastonbury on the Saturday, but where? Surely not ‘headlining’ the JP for the second year in a row?

Given the similarities between this year's line up and 2017 I wouldn't bet against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the lineup times first came out Annie Mac was down as playing somewhere in Shangri-la, possibly the Gas Tower if i remember correctly. This was going to be with Todla T and someone else. But then they revised the Shangi-La times later that day. Either she's now a TBA or she's pulled out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, selotape said:

When the lineup times first came out Annie Mac was down as playing somewhere in Shangri-la, possibly the Gas Tower if i remember correctly. This was going to be with Todla T and someone else. But then they revised the Shangi-La times later that day. Either she's now a TBA or she's pulled out.

Yeah I remember seeing her as Annie MAC Presents, on the Gas Tower. Would be poor if she’s the John Peel tba, we’ve already enough repeats of last year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, briddj said:

Not sure Jeremy would do the Park with Foals and then play a full set with EE a couple of hours later. 

Completely forgot they were using him as their bassist atm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, buffy394 said:

I know we are still 2 and a bit weeks out, but this thread is eerily quiet this year.

Lack of info or  is it just going up against the 'is or isnt it The Killers' year

Think people are pretty settled on the Park TBA being Foals until any info points in a different direction due to there being a few bits about them being there before we knew that vacant slot existed.

The John Peel TBA seems like it’s  just gonna be an underwhelming replacement for Diplo, or even just one of his side projects (Silk City due to Ronson being there that night). Maybe it’s something more than that but right now I’m not expecting much.

Other than that I don’t think there are (m)any other TBA’s worth getting excited or pondering about? Foals seeming like a done deal some time ago has taken any excitement out of speculation this year. I await some ‘it’s not Foals’ info to shake things up a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Wolf Alice? They’re active this summer.

(Just tossing a name in to see what comes out)

I thought this also. Glasto favourites and 'only playing small fests this year' according to someone I know who knows their management. Deffo smell a TBA. Williams Green or would they literally ram out the place?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, buffy394 said:

I thought this also. Glasto favourites and 'only playing small fests this year' according to someone I know who knows their management. Deffo smell a TBA. Williams Green or would they literally ram out the place?

 

Not active until a few weeks later but possible as a one-off, I guess. William's Green on Thursday night would be a crazy idea though, it was bad enough for Everything Everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, buffy394 said:

I thought this also. Glasto favourites and 'only playing small fests this year' according to someone I know who knows their management. Deffo smell a TBA. Williams Green or would they literally ram out the place?

 

Way too big for WG now, but that Park slot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Think people are pretty settled on the Park TBA being Foals until any info points in a different direction due to there being a few bits about them being there before we knew that vacant slot existed.

The John Peel TBA seems like it’s  just gonna be an underwhelming replacement for Diplo, or even just one of his side projects (Silk City due to Ronson being there that night). Maybe it’s something more than that but right now I’m not expecting much.

Other than that I don’t think there are (m)any other TBA’s worth getting excited or pondering about? Foals seeming like a done deal some time ago has taken any excitement out of speculation this year. I await some ‘it’s not Foals’ info to shake things up a bit.

You're probably right. I just thought there was a lot more back and forth last year but I guess it was more down to the wire. 

You never know though! The Park 11:30 slot is still unaccounted for right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, buffy394 said:

You're probably right. I just thought there was a lot more back and forth last year but I guess it was more down to the wire. 

You never know though! The Park 11:30 slot is still unaccounted for right? 

Yeah The Killers came pretty late on if I recall correctly. Think a lot of people were expecting Gorillaz before then. 

11.30 slot is still up for grabs yeah. Had anticipated it just being a late regular Park booking but the closer we get the more I’m expecting it to be more than that. Not expecting anybody massive but will be in the area for Four Tet anyway so will be checking it out either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Yeah The Killers came pretty late on if I recall correctly. Think a lot of people were expecting Gorillaz before then. 

11.30 slot is still up for grabs yeah. Had anticipated it just being a late regular Park booking but the closer we get the more I’m expecting it to be more than that. Not expecting anybody massive but will be in the area for Four Tet anyway so will be checking it out either way.

Interesting. Wolf Alice have played the Park before but I cant see two massive indie bands taking both slots this year, if Foals are one of them of course. Especially as it feels that both of those acts dont really 'fit' the Park anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...