Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2016


thewayiam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 15.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

9 minutes ago, thatcrazypenguin said:

Cant help but feel if it wasnt for adeles popularity right now her music would be a really good fit for something like the acoustic stage or the glade, a more chilled out area. itll never happen though as can you imagine the crush?

Adele playing the Glade, sandwiched inbetween sets from Casetteboy vs DJ Rubbish and Dub Pistols...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stocky3000 said:

Wtih the recent news I am hoping that  

LCD headline other up against Muse as my Friday Headliner
Foals into Radiohead as my Saturday Headliner 
EWF as my Sunday Headliner

yeah that would be my wishlist altho i could care less about foals!

LCD/Radiohead/E,W&F

The rest of the festival sorts itself if this happens!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the 'bands' comment:

If that came from Michael I'd be incredibly suspicious, but I think Emily is more likely to choose her words carefully. If one of the headliners was a solo act, she could easily have said 'three British artists/acts'. I think it's very likely that by saying 'bands' she actually means bands. Adele isn't a band.

Edited by jparx
sp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just cannot get excited about the remaining Pyramid rumours this year.

I realise I am out of step with 99%of opinion on Radiohead's recent material but it's all bit emperors new clothes to me, I wish i was at their last headline show, I'd get excited about that. Muse, a band I quite like, but to have a second multi-repeat headliner is really poor, and I have seen them too many times.

Adele I think would actually be the edgiest of the favoured names, simply as she would be out of her comfort zone and the performance could go either way, triumph or disaster. 

Pleased about the PJ Harvey announcement, intrigued by the BMTH announcement and the New Order rumour too. Think it maybe a strong year for The Other stage this year, only saw Ronson, Turner and the Chems there last year.

Still if Earth Wind and Fire do the sunday on West Holts I shall be over the moon!

Regardless of my indifference to the Pyramid prospects it's nice to have some fizz injected to the debate and speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hotchilidog said:

Just cannot get excited about the remaining Pyramid rumours this year.

I realise I am out of step with 99%of opinion on Radiohead's recent material but it's all bit emperors new clothes to me, I wish i was at their last headline show, I'd get excited about that. Muse, a band I quite like, but to have a second multi-repeat headliner is really poor, and I have seen them too many times.

 

The King of Limbs is OK, not their best.

But given that In Rainbows is 'recent', in terms of their output, Emperor's new clothes? The band have been in Saville frickin' Row!

:)

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bennyhana22 said:

The King of Limbs is OK, not their best.

But given that In Rainbows is 'recent', in terms of their output, Emperor's new clothes? The band have been in Saville frickin' Row!

:)

Ben

Can you really call an album that was released 9 years ago 'recent' ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bennyhana22 said:

The King of Limbs is OK, not their best.

But given that In Rainbows is 'recent', in terms of their output, Emperor's new clothes? The band have been in Saville frickin' Row!

:)

Ben

I realise I am in the minority opinon, just not to my taste that's all.

Granted Rainbows is the one recent album that represents the Radiohead that I like. Just not into Kid A, Amnesiac, TKOL etc. That is just me however.

It's obvious that RH would be an amazing choice for many and for them I'd be delighted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
17 minutes ago, jparx said:

On the 'bands' comment:

If that came from Michael I'd be incredibly suspicious, but I think Emily is more likely to choose her words carefully. If one of the headliners was a solo act, she could easily have said 'three British artists/acts'. I think it's very likely that by saying 'bands' she actually means bands. Adele isn't a band.

Nah. You're over-thinking it. Saying 'bands' is the default, as much with Emily as anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jparx said:

On the 'bands' comment:

If that came from Michael I'd be incredibly suspicious, but I think Emily is more likely to choose her words carefully. If one of the headliners was a solo act, she could easily have said 'three British artists/acts'. I think it's very likely that by saying 'bands' she actually means bands. Adele isn't a band.

She also said last night that PJ Harvey last played in 1994 (it was 2004). Also worth bearing in mind that the Metro article was published before the NME Awards was even finished last night, so may not have been a direct quote given it was rushed through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bennyhana22 said:

Well that was my point, th - despite the time gap, surely it's not unreasonable to describe a band's last-but-one album as recent?!

Ben

I suppose its not unreasonable but i have a thing in my head where recent means within the last 4 years.....i dont know why its 4 but it is and anything that is 4 years or older isnt recent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Nah. You're over-thinking it. Saying 'bands' is the default, as much with Emily as anyone else.

I'm going to give Emily the benefit of the doubt and take on her on word.

Because after all...that would likely mean Radiohead and I need me some straws! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking of over-thinking, I've got a question. If Adele talks didn't come to fruition since the start of the year or so and Radiohead joined the party, would they have shuffled the pack for the days or is it way too late for that? Radiohead on the Saturday while two much bigger bands for the TV audience play either side seems a bit odd.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

You fucking horrible man. After what Beth gave you at glastonbury you'd just drop her like that. Arsehole. Go and buy yourself a pair of hunter wellies. You belong with that crowd now! :-)

well only because they dont offer any new music. Even leonard cohen has released 2 albums since they did, and he's in his 80s!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
21 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Talking of over-thinking, I've got a question. If Adele talks didn't come to fruition since the start of the year or so and Radiohead joined the party, would they have shuffled the pack for the days or is it way too late for that? Radiohead on the Saturday while two much bigger bands for the TV audience play either side seems a bit odd.

the line-ups are always pretty fluid with their placings until everyone's in place - tho of course some bands are gig-free to be able to switch their day, while other bands are not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...