Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

If it has been changed from "Spring" to "closer to the festival", that does imply Not Spring.

If that is what you want it to imply then yes.......

But as Spring ends on 20th June do you really think they will wait til after then?

Closer to the festival can be in 1 hour or tomorrow or a week, or a month........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That change on the Glastonbury website doesn't change anything, we always knew we would wait until closer for the FULL lineup. It might add in with what this guy says about the 3rd headliner in June though, just making it clear to everyone that the full lineup is good few weeks away yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a thought - could it possibly be that this year they're just struggling to book bands that play Other, John Peel & Park?

With the secrecy that surrounds Glastonbury, and they tend to start bookings quite late on compared to all other European festivals, they're just struggling to confirm 10 acts for each day on those three stages, say? Just this year a tad difficult compared to others.

That's maybe why the FULL lineup, will have to wait?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which ties in with what Michael told the bloke on FB. (Still can't post a screenshot of what he said, no idea why)

do you want me to do it?

otherwise screenshot it, send to a friend on fb chat, then open it, right click and copy image URL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread would be much easier to read if you could create a filter that hid any post that met 3 or 4 of the following criteria:

1. mentions the Stone Rose, Oasis and/or Noel Gallagher

2. has joined in the last month

3. has less than 100 posts.

4. uses the phrase 'a friend met', 'a friend spoke to'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best I can do for those who can't see the FB group. ....
Mark His words were, we cannot release the 3rd headliner until xxxxxx because they are doing something else.
  • Mark He did actually tell us when it's coming out, but you wouldn't believe me if I told you.
    All I will say is, you have a very very long wait, not so long for me, because I know when it i
  • Dave Haha Mark Atyeo love it
  • Mark I'm not even joking though.
    It's a contractual thing.
  • Lissa Come on Mark... Share, we won't tell, honest...
    We'll all be contractual too...
  • Dave Would be even better if you knew who. I can imagine your FB going nuts.
    I just wish people would just be patient and have a little faith.
  • Mark Technically, he didn't say don't tell anyone.
    All I say is, you won't hear anything in April, or May.
  • Mark I have a very very good idea, he didn't confirm anything tho.
  • Dave I think peoplè are confusing release of full line up with announcement of third headliner. Full line up always late. Logistics of sorting all the acts out must be a nightmare.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is what you want it to imply then yes.......

But as Spring ends on 20th June do you really think they will wait til after then?

Closer to the festival can be in 1 hour or tomorrow or a week, or a month........

From a meteorological stand point June 1st is the first day of Summer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Neil has been given so.many different stories of the Sunday headliner I suspect he has no idea what to believe now

I gave up taking too much interest a while back. There's too much that's too conflicting but also very weak to make much sense of.

The few bits which I do think are a bit more sound lead to me speculating that it's Prince, tho I'm a very long way from sure about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best I can do for those who can't see the FB group. ....
Mark His words were, we cannot release the 3rd headliner until xxxxxx because they are doing something else.
  • Mark He did actually tell us when it's coming out, but you wouldn't believe me if I told you.

    All I will say is, you have a very very long wait, not so long for me, because I know when it i

  • Dave Haha Mark Atyeo love it
  • Mark I'm not even joking though.

    It's a contractual thing.

  • Lissa Come on Mark... Share, we won't tell, honest...

    We'll all be contractual too...

  • Dave Would be even better if you knew who. I can imagine your FB going nuts.

    I just wish people would just be patient and have a little faith.

  • Mark Technically, he didn't say don't tell anyone.

    All I say is, you won't hear anything in April, or May.

  • Mark I have a very very good idea, he didn't confirm anything tho.
  • Dave I think peoplè are confusing release of full line up with announcement of third headliner. Full line up always late. Logistics of sorting all the acts out must be a nightmare.

All I see in that is the THIRD headliner is delayed.

Nothing else is.

We will get something soon(ish), then some more and then the biggie in June

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...