Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

and let's face it shall we? With true honesty? That's a list of shit songs.

And they're bad enough as the originals, so quite why anyone would want to hear bad metal versions of them I've no idea.

You're more than welcome to him. It says more about your ears than mine. :)

as i was reading this, Let's Go Crazy came on the radio.

You're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

The Roses and Prince would both attract huge, but different, crowds.

The huge 'sing-a-long moments' would be around 5/6 songs for both, like it or lump it.

To be honest, you could make the same 'it'll only work if the crowd are over 30' argument for approximately half of the headline acts over the last 6/7 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think that's true.

The idea that no one under 30 knows any Roses songs

Not what I said..

Booking an act that would play a set made up largely of album tracks from the late '80's, when the organisers have been fairly open about wanting to entice a younger crowd to the festival, doesn't fit. IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually this whole thread brings up one of my greatest bugbears about the whole festival thing. I simply don't like 'big singalongs' - I still remember Oasis '95 being just awful because all I could really here were the dozens of burly blokes around me singing every word in tonelessly flat drones. Blur '09 was similarly marred - and I know I'm in the minority with that. I would much rather hear something unpredictable and transcendent than attend a team karaoke event.

And while I'm at it, I'm kind of fed up of the whole, 'I've not heard that many of their songs' attitude. Honestly, it's like a boring dad leaning into the room, asking 'Who's this then?' 'Nirvana' 'Never heard of 'em?' like that's some kind of caveat for acceptability. I hadn't heard that much Arcade Fire or Kanye, but that should not be a basis on which a headliner should be booked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I never understand this point of view (unless I've misread it) that the band have to be from 'your era' in order for you to be a big fan.

I agree with that.

But from the opposite end, if you lived thru it you remember how its goes (big with the mums, those who bought 2 singles a year, and Texas fans), while those who were five or have been told by Mum how great he is are buying the myth.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me that keeps forgetting we actually have two headliners confirmed. Like CONFIRMED, not TBC on the rumours page but actually confirmed by the festival.

On further thought, it's making me start to think the lineup won't be out this week. Theoretically 2 of the biggest names at the festival are out...

I still want the lineup, but I'm starting understand the 'greed' argument a little bit more.

Yes it's just you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me that keeps forgetting we actually have two headliners confirmed. Like CONFIRMED, not TBC on the rumours page but actually confirmed by the festival.

On further thought, it's making me start to think the lineup won't be out this week. Theoretically 2 of the biggest names at the festival are out...

I still want the lineup, but I'm starting understand the 'greed' argument a little bit more.

almost certainly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can believe it.

If you'd heard people banging on about how he only ever shits gold niggests and then you actually saw what he does, it's hardly a surprise that you'd be disappointed.

Prince is about as cool as Stevie Wonder dropping to his knees guitar-hero style, as he did.

To be fair, at Hop Farm he seemed to understand what was expected of a Prince festival set. If he tried to do all those weird, terminally dull funk/hard rock rearrangements of his songs at Glastonbury his set would tank catastrophically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not what I said..

Booking an act that would play a set made up largely of album tracks from the late '80's, when the organisers have been fairly open about wanting to entice a younger crowd to the festival, doesn't fit. IMO.

They've already booked 2 headliners who are heavily aimed at under 30s.

Should they aim all headliners at the younger crowd?

The Roses album tracks are no ordinary album tracks either

Edited by Space Shanty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea i go to Glasto in a large group of about 25+ of us. all between 22-30, and Prince isnt relevent at all. However everyone likes or loves The Roses. Prince really isnt as popular as people are making out

And everyone I know likes Prince, or at least prefers Prince to the Stone Roses.

I know people who aren't big music fans who could name a couple of Prince songs who don't even know who the Stone Roses are.

It means nothing. Too much bias in the sampling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refer you to almost all of the videos embedded here from his run of shows from last year.

Even some of you that drool when Prince farts said you got bored shitless with the endlessness of them.

no, there was no metal in those videos.

you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I am as well not a fan of these side by side stages. too many people at the same places and you have always people around you who wait for the other stage... 
    • If only they could get the Bits area back (and add maximum 5k capacity) the site would feel less crowded. 
    • Blame it on the side-by-side setup. There are cases where it works well - got a great location in front of the middle screen for Bexter Dury-Big Thief-Little Simz, just had to move about 20 meters each time for a great location. But on most cases it sucks  
    • was happy to swerve the main stages on Saturday, but thought it was fine for The Cure, we just went down the opposite side & got a decent spot close to the front, everyone into it (admittedly a bit off to the side)   a festival that now books Olivia Rodrigo as a surprise set isn't going to get any smaller, for better or for worse it is miles apart from when I was first going   personally I still find the people amazing, never have any hassle & the line ups are always so strong & diverse.  We will definitely return for the 25th anniversary next year!
    • I love this festival but Mordor has got worse and worse to the point now that I dread going there. 10 years ago there just weren’t as many people, as many bottlenecks and there wasnt the need to arrive early to have a decent spot.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...