Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Unless they have made it seem like Florence was a back up and never the first option .. To avoid backlash?

If people think they tried for Prince but fell through last minute, then Florence was promoted to headliner, people would accept this and it would ease the pressure on her?

but Emily brought up Florence herself in the interview - she didn't need to, at all, and it's quite weird that she did in the first place. if this was the case i don't think she'd even mention her - why draw attention to a possible headliner name like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

Is this the first year that Neil hasn't got at least one of the headliners down as TBC before announcement? I have faith in the gaffer to reveal the last one before announcement in April, Worthy HQ wont beat him to the punch on it a third time.

As far as I can remember, yep, it's the first time since '98 I've not got at least one in advance.

And i don't think I will do either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit different but I see where you're coming from....

florence is headlining in my mind, amongst the backlash - I knew her being 'ruled out' was too fishy when this is genuinely the perfect time for her to play. Would not be surprised if (at the time) Emily thought she would not be headlining and they'd get prince - but her giggles on the radio, her "I haven't got the call" - her laughter when fans have brought it up to her... It all fits

I put whatever is left of my reputation on the line and say that florence will headline this year - and neil will have to do his bowing down as he promised! The only reason I have been suggesting others for the past few weeks is because of Neil's certainty! But now there's a crack in that it's gotta be!

If not, 10 quid to water-aid. I'l do it!

Seriously, just stop talking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless they have made it seem like Florence was a back up and never the first option .. To avoid backlash?

If people think they tried for Prince but fell through last minute, then Florence was promoted to headliner, people would accept this and it would ease the pressure on her?

"Florence is actually our last resort because everybody else pulled out" is not a nice thing to say about your headliner, and not a nice way to promote your festival. "We've booked Florence because she puts on a great show and has a long history with the festival and IS a headliner" would be what they'd say, telling people she's there because they couldn't get Prince would do the opposite of avoid backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't deal with this jumping from person to person - it's killing me! Do we have any actual information that makes any of the rumoured people (Roses, Madonna, Taylor Swift, P*****, Flo) more likely than any of the others? Or are we just piggybacking off a thought or a statement from one person and just pinning hopes on that? I'm getting very swayed by some people's convictions and I can't really establish whether these are based on anything.

Help meeeeeeee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from blind optimism!

and Big Vern's little bit of info, but that's it really!

I can't deal with this jumping from person to person - it's killing me! Do we have any actual information that makes any of the rumoured people (Roses, Madonna, Taylor Swift, P*****, Flo) more likely than any of the others? Or are we just piggybacking off a thought or a statement from one person and just pinning hopes on that? I'm getting very swayed by some people's convictions and I can't really establish whether these are based on anything.

Help meeeeeeee.

Neil has some info suggesting it's Prince. not a lot, and he hasn't told us what some of it is, but it's something, and probably more than any of the rest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scroobius podcast with RDB

38:53 in

Says he's tried for squiggle a few times and knows he likes to book things last minute. States problem is that could leave him without a headliner.

Then says he already knows the Prince story for this year, and he doesn't think it involves any UK festivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why Florence's only UK festival appearance would be a sub at Glastonbury? Especially in a year when she had an album to promote. Granted a Pyramid sub is fairly big .. But not huge. Headlining would make much more sense ... But then why not just announce it? .... Why this wait?

To be honest I don't even want to find out who it is anymore! I'm enjoying this convincing myself that its a different act every day!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind it's Sunday and there's the local daytripper crowd, Prince would be a more logical headliner. Though given this thread, logic has long since gone out of the window.

Can't believe I'm even thinking about Prince. Every bloody year we do this.

I know you obviously have issues with the Roses, but I'd say they'd be far more suited to a Sunday night sing-along than Prince. I mean how many Prince song does your average, casual music fan know? 3 or 4 at most?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you obviously have issues with the Roses, but I'd say they'd be far more suited to a Sunday night sing-along than Prince. I mean how many Prince song does your average, casual music fan know? 3 or 4 at most?

Opposed to the average music fan who knows more than Fool's Gold?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...