Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

I am conveniently choosing to ignore this 'fact', until such time that the Icelandic Pixie is formally not announced for GF2015. Until then, she's nailed on.

Ben

Not sure why those guys think that the exclusive live debut of her new album would stop her playing a festival set at Glasters - I don't think it does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

I think it's often underestimated on here how big of a booking Foos are as well. With them and Kanye there's no need whatsoever for the Sunday headliner to be particularly huge.

There is though, as that's the headliner for Sunday local day tickets. If it's someone who's a bit niche currently, I think there'd be proper ructions (even though they'd be my band of the festival). They're good enough with enough material to headline, but it'd be as a friday headliner. This next album is make or break, or at least, wait until the next make or break for them.

I think the statistic of hits by Taylor Swift vs hits by Kasabian pretty much speaks for itself.

I'm not sure what you mean by this, I know you're a TS fan, so i assume you're saying she's had more hits than Kasabian. Not in the UK she hasn't and not for your average festival goer. Not by a long chalk. Kasabian was a safer bet than Taylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the Kanye reaction, if GF announce TS, they must know they'll need to brace themselves for a veritable onslaught of outrage, although most people like Swifty or are at worst indifferent, so it won't be so bad. But there'd be cries of despair from some quarters (who should be ignored). I'm hoping it's her. I want to see her more than Stone Roses, personally.

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 pages to go, didn't we manage to get 30 pages out of the Stone Roses hullabaloo last week? We can do this!

we just need one more knobhead to come on with some outlandish claim and we're there! come on guys - where are all the Bowie rumours or claims that Prince reopened his twitter account, tweeted 'Glasto4ever' before deleting it all again five minutes later!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is though, as that's the headliner for Sunday local day tickets. If it's someone who's a bit niche currently, I think there'd be proper ructions (even though they'd be my band of the festival). They're good enough with enough material to headline, but it'd be as a friday headliner. This next album is make or break, or at least, wait until the next make or break for them.

I wasn't particularly referring to the Stone Roses with my comment, but even so, don't see why it'd be any different than booking The Verve to headline the Sunday in 2008.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't particularly referring to the Stone Roses with my comment, but even so, don't see why it'd be any different than booking The Verve to headline the Sunday in 2008.

The Verve had only just reformed, and had a new single out and a new album soon after. the Roses reformed three and a half years ago, and have done every other festival since. i think they'd need something new - even just a new single and promise of new album - for it to not seem like a weak booking imo. all this may come soon for all we know. will just have to wait and see

*edit: this is just how i see it - i'm sure a lot of people couldn't give a toss about new material and would be happy to just see em play the first album + a load of b-sides and singles all over again

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't particularly referring to the Stone Roses with my comment, but even so, don't see why it'd be any different than booking The Verve to headline the Sunday in 2008.

Was Superscally referring to the Roses? I thought it was Flo. I don't think the Stone Roses could be described as 'niche' nor their album 'make or break'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we just need one more knobhead to come on with some outlandish claim and we're there! come on guys - where are all the Bowie rumours or claims that Prince reopened his twitter account, tweeted 'Glasto4ever' before deleting it all again five minutes later!?

Well I didn't want to say anything... But I've heard that Bowie and Jagger have agreed to perform "Dancing in the Street" together for two hours while Prince plays the banjo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why those guys think that the exclusive live debut of her new album would stop her playing a festival set at Glasters - I don't think it does

She's not playing at Glastonbury. Friend of mine works on something to do with her and told me that the Manchester show is the first show of the new album cycle proper. No more festivals to be added, by all accounts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the Kanye reaction, if GF announce TS, they must know they'll need to brace themselves for a veritable onslaught of outrage, although most people like Swifty or are at worst indifferent, so it won't be so bad. But there'd be cries of despair from some quarters (who should be ignored). I'm hoping it's her. I want to see her more than Stone Roses, personally.

One thing's for sure twitter/social media will go mental if The Stone Roses headline......in a good way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we just need one more knobhead to come on with some outlandish claim and we're there! come on guys - where are all the Bowie rumours or claims that Prince reopened his twitter account, tweeted 'Glasto4ever' before deleting it all again five minutes later!?

Pulp are doing it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will it? Twitter didn't exactly crash when the Foos were announced and they're a lot more popular amongst the typical Twitter demographics.

think it'd be more to do with the Roses coming back after two years of inactivity (amongst rumours they'd packed it in again) to finally do Glastonbury. would be pretty huge i feel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Superscally referring to the Roses? I thought it was Flo. I don't think the Stone Roses could be described as 'niche' nor their album 'make or break'.

I just figured since that's what all the talk's been about, but you're right, maybe not. For what it's worth I don't see any problem in terms of suitability for either the Stone Roses or Flo for the Sunday, though. I was basing what I said on the Roses having new material like The Verve did, I don't think they'd be booked otherwise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...