Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Oasis


Guest

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, chatty said:

Dunno why anyone's arsed about this. It's clearly one of two things and probably both. 

 

I can't say for sure but the fella looks about as camp as can be and highlights a load of homophobic stuff they said in the 90s so clearly has a personal issue with them, which is fair enough, but makes you a sh*t person to choose to write about them. 

 

Secondly, it's f**king great click bait so brings up the numbers coming through the website as it's been shared all over. You'll see loads of this over the next year, mostly from clueless people who just wanna generate traffic. 

 

Oasis were always pretty divisive so no surprise they still are and will continue to be. 

 

 

“Camp as can be” - really??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, Gigs and Tours is indicating that you'll need a code for the main sale:

 

You require a promotional code to attempt to make a booking, which will have been provided to you prior to the sale.

You will be able to enter a promotional code here when this event goes on sale on Saturday 31 August 2024 at 9:00.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CharlotteB said:

 

I'm very willing to be wrong, because I do really like Oasis. But I think that to be "seminal" you have to be innovating and influential. Oasis didn't do anything new, or change the landscape of music. They just followed a well-trodden path, and did their thing well.

 

The definition that pops up on Google is:

 

strongly influencing later developments.


They certainly didn’t innovate, musically there was nothing groundbreaking.

 

But in terms of cultural influence, they were unrivalled. 

They were (and still are) huge, a phenomenon that musically hasn’t been matched in this country since. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, doogie said:

Interestingly, Gigs and Tours is indicating that you'll need a code for the main sale:

 

You require a promotional code to attempt to make a booking, which will have been provided to you prior to the sale.

You will be able to enter a promotional code here when this event goes on sale on Saturday 31 August 2024 at 9:00.

 

How do you register to get a code?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, doogie said:

Interestingly, Gigs and Tours is indicating that you'll need a code for the main sale:

 

You require a promotional code to attempt to make a booking, which will have been provided to you prior to the sale.

You will be able to enter a promotional code here when this event goes on sale on Saturday 31 August 2024 at 9:00.

Hopefully that's a good thing? Bozos who didn't create accounts locked out??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just opening a cider in a mixture of joy for getting tickets and also shock that I just spent £167.75 per ticket and the added extra booking fee of £2.75. Fairly sure that's a new grim mile stone in tickets prices for me. Hoping they announce a decent support to lesson the blow a little.

 

I have been told, no more tickets and think she means it this time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, maelzoid said:

 

This is right.

 

The rampant mis-use of the word seminal is one of my personal bugbears. It is not simply a synonym for influential (which Oasis definitely are) but rather the influence of later developments, which Oasis definitely have not done.

 

Good musical examples would be Kraftwerk made seminal electronic music, or the Stooges were a seminal punk band. But it seems most people use it as a synonym for 'really good'.

 

Although that is dying out now in favour of iconic, which is a little more accurate but is so overused it winds me up just as much.

Worse than the rampant misuse of the word 'unprecedented'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, doogie said:

Interestingly, Gigs and Tours is indicating that you'll need a code for the main sale:

 

You require a promotional code to attempt to make a booking, which will have been provided to you prior to the sale.

You will be able to enter a promotional code here when this event goes on sale on Saturday 31 August 2024 at 9:00.

I’m confused - how can I get one of these codes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

image.thumb.png.f64c84d2c0a3ff524edcb8c7c85470ee.png


Just had a google, 15 million more records than Oasis, in a shorter period of time! Well I never knew that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...