Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, SilverLining said:

I looked at the history and thought there, 'Did they not confirm the headliners for last year before they were announced?'

Then I remembered how absolutely obvious the headliners were for a while before announcement.

 

They absolutely were not. At least, not for the Sunday night.

 

The headliners were announced on 14th March 2024. We thought Stevie Wonder was headlining up until approx 2 weeks before that, and it was another few days before SZA came firmly into the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, incident said:

 

That was a legends slot thing, and drove me crazy trying to compile it.

 

Would imagine headliners would be even worse..

was thinking about doing a 2025 headliner game ( forgotten its name ) will try and do it when I get a free few mins unless anyone fancies sending me a list of the possibles we still have 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andy0808 v5 said:

I will never understand the rush some people seem to get, for trying wind up about 20 people at most. 

Just had this on Facebook. I didn’t join a group called ‘Glastonbury 2025’ so it’s some old group that’s changed its name and knocked up a fake poster!

 

whats the point? For 5 likes 😂
 

IMG_1057.thumb.jpeg.78b66cac11249ed06fa6c253b662d6ab.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

A week before it was announced and was already known. You also mentioned green day and KoL 

Was SZA known about before the drop? I forget this! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, stuie said:

Just had this on Facebook. I didn’t join a group called ‘Glastonbury 2025’ so it’s some old group that’s changed its name and knocked up a fake poster!

 

whats the point? For 5 likes 😂
 

IMG_1057.thumb.jpeg.78b66cac11249ed06fa6c253b662d6ab.jpeg

People get their kicks on social media wherever they can I guess.

 

Long as we don't get a rerun of that weird poster with all the names on in a circle for the abandoned 2020(?) festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, setboppoys said:

the ones where i said sza coldplay and dua lipa were headlining?

 

3 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

A week before it was announced and was already known. You also mentioned green day and KoL 

 

To be honest until it's announced you don't actually know anything unless the the direct information is right literally infront of you as even the msor rwliable get it wrong occasionally. It wouldn't be that unfathomable for Stevie to be back in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/2/2024 at 10:45 PM, northernangel said:

Fortunately this has no chance of happening. Worst overall set of headliners they could book. Olivia also can't do Friday by all counts.  Cave had about 200 people watch him before Mumford haha 


 

the thing is I think somebody might have their BST dates crossed. Sabrina that Friday, O Rod the following weekend in between Noah and Hugh Jackman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


 

the thing is I think somebody might have their BST dates crossed. Sabrina that Friday, O Rod the following weekend in between Noah and Hugh Jackman. 

The funny thing with all this is that 'The Post' is still no less reliable than anything else in terms of the acts mentioned. Someone has said about Stevie Wonder and that post basically says that if Rihanna couldn't be agreed then Stevie would be a next option along. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So yes, Stevie Wonder was one of the names I was told. HOWEVER - there was reason to doubt it, and I've still had nothing since to suggest I should be confident, I guess given someone else has come on dangling that specific carrot, though - there's no harm in me mentioning I also heard that.

 

If it is right, I have reason to believe it will be the Sunday. Again though, there seems to be enough doubt around the remaining two at the moment to not get overly excited/confident.

 

On the other name, separate to Stevie, that one I'd be more confident of getting concrete info on and pre-Christmas. It's easier to do digging on and I will, when the timing is right (there's a danger of pissing people off if I go in all guns blazing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, stuie said:

Just had this on Facebook. I didn’t join a group called ‘Glastonbury 2025’ so it’s some old group that’s changed its name and knocked up a fake poster!

 

whats the point? For 5 likes 😂
 

IMG_1057.thumb.jpeg.78b66cac11249ed06fa6c253b662d6ab.jpeg

 

The story behind these posters is this; Over on the discord, they have a stage predictions thread, much like the one on here. One of the users creates a poster from his guesses, just a bit of fun and to be fair, it makes it more interesting than just a list of names. At no point does he say they are a leaked line-up. 

 

These posters often make their way into the wider world via Reddit or one of the Facebook groups, with someone then making out it's a leak. So what has started out as a bit of fun, ends up being something people either believe, or get angry about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mufcok said:

So yes, Stevie Wonder was one of the names I was told. HOWEVER - there was reason to doubt it, and I've still had nothing since to suggest I should be confident, I guess given someone else has come on dangling that specific carrot, though - there's no harm in me mentioning I also heard that.

 

If it is right, I have reason to believe it will be the Sunday. Again though, there seems to be enough doubt around the remaining two at the moment to not get overly excited/confident.

 

On the other name, separate to Stevie, that one I'd be more confident of getting concrete info on and pre-Christmas. It's easier to do digging on and I will, when the timing is right (there's a danger of pissing people off if I go in all guns blazing).


That sounds spicy! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...