Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Worthy View (or alternatives)


BigMarv

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

So wouldnt there be a nice bit of news this week with the book launch, potential headliner announcement and WV sale? Seems to be the right timing. I just wonder if the priority sale will be a separate day to whatever the “regular” sale is. And if they sell out of WV in the priority sale? Will that be the new normal? If you dont get a coach ticket youre s.o.l on buying wv?

I hope not! I tried to get coach but no luck sadly, would be gutted if it meant I didn't get into wv.

Wonder if the Glasto on Sea pre erected tents will also go on sale the same day?

Edited by Bryanrebe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ShakeyCrash said:

I for one don’t get the worthy view for coach tickets incentive thing. Can someone please explain? I mean it’s not as if they struggle to sell them.

Surely it’s obvious. To further incentivise and reward people to try for the coach, it has nothing to do with trying to shift WV accommodation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Surely it’s obvious. To further incentivise and reward people to try for the coach, it has nothing to do with trying to shift WV accommodation.

Also people who drive are less in need of pre-erected tents as they haven't had to traipse all over the country carrying all their stuff to get to the festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I'd like to see this year would be a separation of WV and camper van sales. It buggers up the site having everyone trying for two completely different things at the same time.

If the sale is on a Saturday then surely something like this would make sense:

9am - WV Priority for coach travellers

10am - General WV sale

11am - Camper van sale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

One thing I'd like to see this year would be a separation of WV and camper van sales. It buggers up the site having everyone trying for two completely different things at the same time.

If the sale is on a Saturday then surely something like this would make sense:

9am - WV Priority for coach travellers

10am - General WV sale

11am - Camper van sale

Sounds like a sensible suggestion, plus it means that all my CV mates would be able to help me and my wife get a WV tent and me help them with CV tickets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/information/accommodation/

Quote

 

Worthy View, Tipi and Caravan/Campervan ticket bookings will be taken exclusively by the Festival’s nominated booking agency, See Tickets.

Coach + ticket package holders will have access to a pre-sale for Worthy View accommodation from 6pm on Thursday 21st November, 2019.

The pre-sale will be followed by a general release of campervan/caravan tickets (for general admission ticket holders only), tipis and Worthy View accommodation at 7pm on Thursday 21st November, 2019.

In order to make an accommodation booking, you must already have a valid ticket booking for Glastonbury 2020.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Deaf Nobby Burton said:

Surely it’s obvious. To further incentivise and reward people to try for the coach, it has nothing to do with trying to shift WV accommodation.

But the coach always sells out ridiculously quickly as well. It's not as if people are leaving unsold coach tickets so they can drive. 

If they want to get people to leave cars at home, they should incentivise people who didn't buy the coach ticket packages to travel by train or NE coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, duke88 said:

But the coach always sells out ridiculously quickly as well. It's not as if people are leaving unsold coach tickets so they can drive. 

If they want to get people to leave cars at home, they should incentivise people who didn't buy the coach ticket packages to travel by train or NE coaches.

I agree its' not to incentivize anything, as everything sells out immediately now so there is literally nothing to incentivize. If they wanted to increase coach travel it would be as easy as adding as many more more coach tickets as they wanted. They'd still sell out immediately.

I believe the reason is what @Johnnyseven said above it's to help out people who 100% guaranteed are not arriving by car, and so could especially use the help of a pre-erected tent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, assorted said:

I agree its' not to incentivize anything, as everything sells out immediately now so there is literally nothing to incentivize. If they wanted to increase coach travel it would be as easy as adding as many more more coach tickets as they wanted. They'd still sell out immediately.

I believe the reason is what @Johnnyseven said above it's to help out people who 100% guaranteed are not arriving by car, and so could especially use the help of a pre-erected tent. 

There's probably a limit to just how many more people could travel by coach as well. Can't be easy sourcing so many coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, duke88 said:

But the coach always sells out ridiculously quickly as well. It's not as if people are leaving unsold coach tickets so they can drive. 

If they want to get people to leave cars at home, they should incentivise people who didn't buy the coach ticket packages to travel by train or NE coaches.

 

2 hours ago, Johnnyseven said:

It also, theoretically, reduces the amount of luggage people bring to put under the coach. Although i'm not really sure that would work out that well as people may just bring more baggage instead of a tent.

 

3 hours ago, assorted said:

I agree its' not to incentivize anything, as everything sells out immediately now so there is literally nothing to incentivize. If they wanted to increase coach travel it would be as easy as adding as many more more coach tickets as they wanted. They'd still sell out immediately.

I believe the reason is what @Johnnyseven said above it's to help out people who 100% guaranteed are not arriving by car, and so could especially use the help of a pre-erected tent. 

I disagree, yes the festival sells out irrespective, from that point of view there are tons of things they do that they don’t need to if you want to look at it like that.

The festival has a strong green ethos, it’s as much about changing mindsets as anything else. Obviously the coach would sell out regardless, but making it as attractive as possible for people to try for the coach is encouraging people to look at doing things in a greener way.

They don’t need to do this, but the moment they stop doing things they don’t need to do is the moment the festival dies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/10/2019 at 5:07 PM, Spider43 said:

Worth looking at Willow Meadows which used to be the pop up motel. Stayed there the last few years for various reasons and not had any issues although have only done the pitch your own option.

I’ve booked to stay here but am stressing now that it’s too far out with a 9 year old in tow.  Any advice on whether it’ll be ok or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Loopie77 said:

I’ve booked to stay here but am stressing now that it’s too far out with a 9 year old in tow.  Any advice on whether it’ll be ok or not?

My daughter was 10 and son was 8, no problems at all. I’d much rather have a flat walk back rather than hill to WV with kids in tow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2019 at 2:54 AM, ShakeyCrash said:

I for one don’t get the worthy view for coach tickets incentive thing. Can someone please explain? I mean it’s not as if they struggle to sell them.

its a bit of a weird paradox for me this year - the ONLY reason i am (for the first time ever) considering WV is because we got coach package tickets (for the first time ever).

i had a bad feeling about tickets this time round - normally i am pretty confident we will get them in the general sale, and thankfully we always have done.

but for some reason this time i had zero confidence of getting through in the general so for the first time went for a coach package - got through to the choose a day screen and figured everybody would be going for wednesday so i picked thursday and got our tickets.

so - for the first time we a) have a coach package, and b) will not be arriving 6 hours before the gates open on wednesday.

i know only too well that we have absolutely ZERO chance of getting our usual camping spot in big ground - and the idea of trudging around some far flung field to squeeze the tents in is far beyond anything i can be bothered to deal with.

so - WV here we come! (although fuck knows how we're going to pay for it).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone stayed at love fields Pitch Your Own before? I notice that they charge for a pitch for two people and extra for each additional person.  Given that the pitch is 6m x 6m, would it be acceptable to pitch two tents in the area if you pay for a pitch plus two extra people for example? Or are you only allowed the one tent per pitch? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, slumberjack said:

Anyone stayed at love fields Pitch Your Own before? I notice that they charge for a pitch for two people and extra for each additional person.  Given that the pitch is 6m x 6m, would it be acceptable to pitch two tents in the area if you pay for a pitch plus two extra people for example? Or are you only allowed the one tent per pitch? 

I think this is a question for Love Fields. I would have thought being a commercial enterprise they'd insist on 1 tent per pitch, but they would be the people who would know. A workaround would be to buy a bigger tent with a couple of bedrooms, at the prices they charge it's probably by far the cheaper option. Not much difference in privacy between 2 tents pitched closely together and 1 with 2 separate bedrooms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Johnnyseven said:

I think this is a question for Love Fields. I would have thought being a commercial enterprise they'd insist on 1 tent per pitch, but they would be the people who would know. A workaround would be to buy a bigger tent with a couple of bedrooms, at the prices they charge it's probably by far the cheaper option. Not much difference in privacy between 2 tents pitched closely together and 1 with 2 separate bedrooms.

Thanks for the reply.  Considered contacting them direct but thought that someone that has previously camped there would know.  Will give them a shout direct anyway.  Cheers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has the accommodation page been updated on the Glastonbury website?

It seems to give a bit more Info than I last remember, I can’t remember it saying you had to buy worthy view parking should you get a tent and can’t remember it saying you may buy 2 accommodation max. Still no upto date prices yet though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, slumberjack said:

Anyone stayed at love fields Pitch Your Own before? I notice that they charge for a pitch for two people and extra for each additional person.  Given that the pitch is 6m x 6m, would it be acceptable to pitch two tents in the area if you pay for a pitch plus two extra people for example? Or are you only allowed the one tent per pitch? 

Not sure about multiple tents on a single pitch but if you have more then 4 people you have to purchase an additional pitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...