Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Tour Announcements & Upcoming Gigs


FloorFiller

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Small beer compared to the allegations and revelations about Win, but Arcade Fire's status hasn't been helped by them not putting a decent album out for at least a decade.

I liked Everything Now as a way-in, though am aware that a band that liked to see themselves as the new U2 have seen that album seen as their version of U2's Pop.

WE was a chore, mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Nal said:

Agree 100% but not all behaviours are equal. 

Win and Ryan were actually sexually taking advantage of women while being manic aggressive stalker weirdos in positions of power. Peel was a self admitted paedo.

Bowie, Page and Plant, Iggy et al slept with underage groupie girls in the early 70s at a time when it was so acceptable in society that they wrote songs about it and people bought the records.

Townshend did none of those things, to anyones knowledge. 

  

Yeah. But she also would've been involved in changing it from the New Tent to the Peel Tent a year after he did an  interview admitting his behaviour in depth. 

Not having a go at Emily. There was no one calling him out on this at the time. Not us on here, the BBC or his millions of listeners. His death largely buried the, err, fiddly bits untll after Me Too.

 

To be fair, Butler should be ostracized from decent society anyway for calling himself DJ Windows 98.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bike_Like_A_Mum said:

Just seen the news about Standon Calling being called off! What a shame, not one I've been to but not good industry news. Sad for the regular creative teams.

Looks like they owe loads from last year too! Had no idea

Was this Tweet a few weeks ago by a stand-up I like that made me aware that something wasn't right.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bike_Like_A_Mum said:

🤣

Not on at all! Looks like a right mess...

I don't think I appreciated how far this mess went until I saw others saying they were still waiting on payments in the tens of thousands. Which is a really questionable situation for them to have left people in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, beau1 said:

I doubt AF would play Glastonbury anyway; they've never had the best relationship with the festival & if they were to play UK festivals it would be to headline medium size ones. That would have been the case even before the Win allegations came out.

Yeah their appearance as a 2014 headliner was probably the right time and only time for them to get such a position imo. I assume they'd still draw a crowd even with the allegations following him around, but I can't see it being a Glasto or Reading headline any time soon. Or even matching the times they headlined Hyde Park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"[Arcade Fire] Win's actions are certainly questionable they are really no different to some of our beloved acts such as [X] and [Y]; and dozens of other acts that have controversial moments whether involving sexual misconduct or not."

Just to say that I find this to be a very dangerous slope. Essentially this could be read as "sexual misconduct is OK, because so many people are doing sexual misconduct". I don't accept this at all. I think Win's action are bad, and what other musicians have done feels really irrelevant.

I understand that this is a Glastonbury forum, and Glastonbury may have booked other questionable acts. But then all I can see is that then we should question those bookings as well, not accept this as the normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Nicklord said:

The thing with Win Butler is that there's basically nothing proven or any really concrete evidence, it's just several people saying he's a peace of sh*t and manipulative and he said he isn't. That was it, nothing more came about it since 2022 I think

This is true. Apart from the testimony of five people, their text messages, the explicit photos of Win masturbating, and the independent corroboration by Pitchfork of the above by friends and associates of all five, there’s no real concrete evidence. And Win has said that he thought all five were asking for it, so it’s ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, emmanuel said:

"[Arcade Fire] Win's actions are certainly questionable they are really no different to some of our beloved acts such as [X] and [Y]; and dozens of other acts that have controversial moments whether involving sexual misconduct or not."

Just to say that I find this to be a very dangerous slope. Essentially this could be read as "sexual misconduct is OK, because so many people are doing sexual misconduct". I don't accept this at all. I think Win's action are bad, and what other musicians have done feels really irrelevant.

I understand that this is a Glastonbury forum, and Glastonbury may have booked other questionable acts. But then all I can see is that then we should question those bookings as well, not accept this as the normal.

Considering you've quoted me here...

That was my point; not that sexual misconduct is ok but rather we should be judging all artists the same for their unacceptable behavoir.

I agree with your point but you've taken my post completely out of context. The discussion revolved around the notion of how much Arcade Fire's status had been affected and if people/bookers really cared; not whether Win's actions were acceptable.

Everyone, including me thinks Win has been gross but that doesn't mean the band won't be booked, or if their status has been affected because of it.

There seems to be a double standard here that some acts are allowed to get away with and still get booked, whilst others get cancelled. 

Like I said, no-one batted an eyelid when GnR headlined last year; and two of their members were charged with statutory rape.

 

Edited by beau1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, beau1 said:

Considering you've quoted me here...

That was my point; not that sexual misconduct is ok but rather we should be judging all artists the same for their unacceptable behavoir.

I agree with your point but you've taken my post completely out of context. The discussion revolved around the notion of how much Arcade Fire's status had been affected and if people/bookers really cared; not whether Win's actions were acceptable.

Everyone, including me thinks Win has been gross but that doesn't mean the band won't be booked, or if their status has been affected because of it.

There seems to be a double standard here that some acts are allowed to get away with and still get booked, whilst others get cancelled. 

Like I said, no-one batted an eyelid when GnR headlined last year; and two of their members were charged with statutory rape.

This is complete bollocks, go and look through the threads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Drinky said:

This is true. Apart from the testimony of five people, their text messages, the explicit photos of Win masturbating, and the independent corroboration by Pitchfork of the above by friends and associates of all five, there’s no real concrete evidence. And Win has said that he thought all five were asking for it, so it’s ok.

I remember reading about it when it happened and I don't remember Pitchfork showing any text messages at all. I read this one where it basically goes: "This girl said X but Win Butler said Y and then a girl said Z" 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Latest Activity

    • It was great, but I don't know why they continue to play Wide Lovely Eyes and Rings of Saturn, which are the weakest of the tracks off both PTSA and ST. Well, I do. It's cos they're about Suzie, so he can sing what he wants. They're the low points of the set. The rest is ace.
    • I didn't this time, but I've seen them before and just because you saw both that night doesn’t mean you can compare them. The Stones were great, but.you didn't think so and you went somewhere else looking for a good time and you found it. For whatever reason you didn't like it, but you were an outlier and all the reviews said they were great.
    • Annie Lennox could be the one to unite the whole forum, nobody has a bad word to say about her, even noted curmudgeon Skip 😄 I'd probably even amble along for a bit meself, and i'm also a miserable sod 
    • If the below link works - thats interesting.   While I don't particularly put much stock in that account as a source (never seen it before though, tbf), and I can pick a hole or two (see below) in what he says - the timing of it is a week before I had the Fontaines '27 stadium info (same stadium he says on there, Tottenham). The info, or part of it, matches up.   Holes I'd pick: I'd have to watch again but I THINK he says 'end of year' for Tottenham - not possible, for a number of reasons, though he's probably just got his words mixed up there. It's Summer '27, or that's what I've been told. He also says Glastonbury is/would be based on how the album does. That doesn't stack up to me, unless it was a 2028 thing. I suppose that could stack up, i.e a verbal agreement for 2028, but still seems a bit of an odd approach. I would personally still expect it to be 2027 alongside the stadium gigs, IF they are gonna do it, though I've still not got a Scooby when the album is gonna drop, only that the tour is due for Spring (or early) next year.   Interesting, nonetheless.   https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaOB3Q9qkwW/
    • I was hoping that they would just do a tour like they were set to in 2020, rather than having Download as their UK appearance. If they are at DL, I would be surprised to see them headline. I think they sub under Deftones or SOAD 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...