Jump to content

Lorde


jyoung
 Share

Recommended Posts

I genuinely dont know howvto say anything about the cover that isnt going to upset someone but my first thought was - why is that needed- my second thought was obviously its nothing to do with me. 3rd thought. Bloody glad it's not the rolling stones new one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, danmarks said:

I genuinely dont know howvto say anything about the cover that isnt going to upset someone but my first thought was - why is that needed- my second thought was obviously its nothing to do with me. 3rd thought. Bloody glad it's not the rolling stones new one.

Think everyone is in agreement it's a bit bizarre. No need to be sensitive.

maybe this is the era she goes full bjork / kate bush

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Whoa now, before any of you perverts get too excited, I zoomed RIGHT in on the photo and gave it a good look over and she is wearing bikini bottoms. 

"it was just research officer, research for efests" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

It’s a bit jarring because it doesn’t really feel like something she would do.

Got people talking, hasn’t it? 

And besides, although it is just a full blown shot of her arse, there’s a certain artiness to the picture, or at least it’s not just her squeezing her boobs at the camera. Be interesting to see if the rest of the album promo stuff is like this or if it’s just a talking point for the first single.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FloorFiller said:

Got people talking, hasn’t it? 

And besides, although it is just a full blown shot of her arse, there’s a certain artiness to the picture, or at least it’s not just her squeezing her boobs at the camera. Be interesting to see if the rest of the album promo stuff is like this or if it’s just a talking point for the first single.

Yeah that’s what surprised me, she’s never really gone down the “sex sells”’route before, but as you say maybe it is just for the initial shock factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass said:

Yeah that’s what surprised me, she’s never really gone down the “sex sells”’route before, but as you say maybe it is just for the initial shock factor.

She was 16 when royals dropped and I think only like 19/20 when Melodrama was out, so it’s probably a general growing up thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

True. And it’s not like I’m bothered either way, I’m neither prude nor perv, it was just genuinely surprising to see.

No it’s definitely been done as a statement. I’m expecting this album to sound more mature than Pure Heroine and Melodrama and I think she’s trying to signal that with her first statement piece!

Edited by Matt42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt42 said:

No it’s definitely been done as a statement. I’m expecting this album to sound more mature than Pure Heroine and Melodrama and I think she’s trying to signal that with her first statement piece!

Second single ‘Bootyshaker’ yet to be announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...