Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

If Queen play you're not going to notice Freddie Mercury either

Aye and i wouldn't go see them without Freddie as he was the voice. No way can the same be said for her. Victoria not being there is an authentic representation of the original talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think my standpoint on the 'broad church of musical tastes at Glastonbury' is what people interpret that to mean. To me it means expanding the reach of Glastonbury beyond the mainstream to include the fringe musical tastes, that no obscure interest is too out there. It doesn't mean including even more mainstream, popular, big sellers. That's not a broad church, thats just filling the pews with more of the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Doug85 said:

Aye and i wouldn't go see them without Freddie as he was the voice. No way can the same be said for her. Victoria not being there is an authentic representation of the original talent. 

I see your point. 

But my wife likes her pop and felt Take That were not the same act when they toured without Robbie as part of their comeback. Those that grew up with them will feel that they're not getting a full authentic experience. 

I can't vouch for the Westlifers after McFadden went solo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Titters said:

I see your point. 

But my wife likes her pop and felt Take That were not the same act when they toured without Robbie as part of their comeback. Those that grew up with them will feel that they're not getting a full authentic experience. 

I can't vouch for the Westlifers after McFadden went solo. 

If 5ive don't have 5 members, are they really 5ive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Keithy said:

I think my standpoint on the 'broad church of musical tastes at Glastonbury' is what people interpret that to mean. To me it means expanding the reach of Glastonbury beyond the mainstream to include the fringe musical tastes, that no obscure interest is too out there. It doesn't mean including even more mainstream, popular, big sellers. That's not a broad church, thats just filling the pews with more of the same.

I think the bandwidth has remained narrow at Glastonbury for whatever reason - this is really very obvious if you spend time at Womad or the Proms which often I find much more experimental and challenging than anything I have seen at Glastonbury. Should that be the case? I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Titters said:

I see your point. 

But my wife likes her pop and felt Take That were not the same act when they toured without Robbie as part of their comeback. Those that grew up with them will feel that they're not getting a full authentic experience. 

I can't vouch for the Westlifers after McFadden went solo. 

Robbie Williams is a c**t. Never mention him again. 

Sorry.

Carry on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, giantkatestacks said:

I think the bandwidth has remained narrow at Glastonbury for whatever reason - this is really very obvious if you spend time at Womad or the Proms which often I find much more experimental and challenging than anything I have seen at Glastonbury. Should that be the case? I dunno.

Well yeah ,it stands to reason that events specialising in a certain genre will be more in-depth than an event which provides a variety. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, giantkatestacks said:

I think the bandwidth has remained narrow at Glastonbury for whatever reason - this is really very obvious if you spend time at Womad or the Proms which often I find much more experimental and challenging than anything I have seen at Glastonbury. Should that be the case? I dunno

I think it's certainly narrowed on the main stages since the post Jay Z year in that the Eavii seemed to have made a conscious move towards getting huge selling acts which in turn has led to a rapidly increasing demand for tickets.

I think the 'womad' part of Glastonbury has gone tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GETOFFAMYLAWN said:

Well yeah ,it stands to reason that events specialising in a certain genre will be more in-depth than an event which provides a variety. 

True of course, yet if you delve deeply enough into the depths off the undercard, Glastonbury does throw up some nicely mental leftfield experimental stuff...

Weeks of dissecting the line up as if I were a member of a CSI team does help, of course.

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, giantkatestacks said:

I think the bandwidth has remained narrow at Glastonbury for whatever reason - this is really very obvious if you spend time at Womad or the Proms which often I find much more experimental and challenging than anything I have seen at Glastonbury. Should that be the case? I dunno.

Womad type acts often get a good showing at Glastonbury. There's quite a crossover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • 👍 plus they brought their own screens 📺 either side of the stage.
    • Production was the only thing that could even explain why she would back out. Like they had sorted out the financials and she was fine with it and then a production meeting happened. It all fell apart. It was very clear that she was not going to compromise her show one bit and then that show in Brazil pretty much confirmed it. There was like one element they couldnt pull off outdoors, but it was negligible since the rest was a carbon copy of the tour she had been on. Glasto is not willing to make any bold changes on the Pyramid stage so then theyre kinda stuck in terms of what some acts want/demand. I think the easiest solution to that is putting her on Friday. You deal with the changes for one night and then re configure for the rest of the weekend. In 24 they were fortunate to have had Dua and Coldplay on Fri and Sat so they could both use the b stage. But I think it was removed for Sunday?     I saw a random rag article earlier that said Olivia Dean turned down Glasto BECAUSE her ex ( not even confirmed dating ) Harry Styles was playing the fest. hahahaha
    • No argument that he’s bigger than ever, I just have no enthusiasm for it.
    • Keep in mind those crowds were full of teenagers. Glasto aint full of teenagers. Theres no way she could demand headline and get it because they got other acts to give the slot to who deserve it with a bigger catalog. Reading/Leeds would headline her cause its still LN.  If the fest was struggling its Other headline. But a 3rd down Pyramid is likely the landing spot. Itll go down like the Camila Cabello performance pretty much.
    • Norwich times if anyone is interested 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...