Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Be interesting to see what sort of reaction they get if they reformed, they were looking very much a spent force by the end (although I maintain Collapse Into Now was great) - gigs not selling out, venues being downgraded...  If they came back now the reunion hype could probably land them a headline slot at BST. 

It would yeah. I guess the longer they leave it, the more legendary they’d become and thoughts of those last few years would ebb away. I don’t think they’d reach the heights again though, for all their success in the 1990’s, they don’t seem particularly influential, or a name to drop for younger people. Would love the chance to see them again, always brilliant live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JoeyT said:

I could get on board with this.

Would probably do something else Friday night, like 2015 after Dave's leg it free'd it up.

I wanted to see Christy Moore on Acoustic Stage as something different, but none of my 20-30 strong group were bothered… ended up getting slaughtered at Libertines and seeing Enter Shikari in JPT… some fella outside the tent gave me his Cookie Monster helmet from a suit and I ran into the pit.

The lack of holes for eyes was brutal.

Gaga Saturday Pyramid & The Streets Sunday Other for me, can I get an amen.

51513542_328796098054127_5063121535464636416_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CJTM said:



Still trust info on Wolf Alice turning it down is still accurate due to them having a break, but at the time I was told they might do a few random to test new stuff, like they did with Euro last year (Benicassim springs to mind)… think they will wait for LP3 for Glastonbury 2020.

Wolf Alice are headlining Truck festival end of July so they are about this summer. But yeah, it could be a one off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nikkic said:

I think I probably missed this info, so apologies, but what was the actual reason for Macca pulling out? 

Do we know? And is there any info pointing towards him being there next year instead? 

Announced show(s) in Vegas weekend of Glastonbury 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Yeah they've always been pretty adamant that they would never do it, but I suppose things change, bills pile up, etc...

Be interesting to see what sort of reaction they get if they reformed, they were looking very much a spent force by the end (although I maintain Collapse Into Now was great) - gigs not selling out, venues being downgraded...  If they came back now the reunion hype could probably land them a headline slot at BST. 

Bookers with money are chasing them. They clearly all like each other still, like performing still, etc. I initially thought they were a case of finally being done with music after a long career but I’m convinced it’s only a matter of time until they do shows again with all the interest in reuniting them. You don’t really hear bookers speak about trying to reunite many other bands anymore.

I think they’d do stadia if they returned. Looking at the types that are doing them now, R.E.M on a reunion could easily do that yeah. And I think they’d be happy to play Glastonbury again (if the promoters let them).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see REM doing it - Stipe always sounds pretty adamant on the subject and it always felt they all have a bit more integrity than most, with regards to both their success and failures.

They'd still do stadiums - Accelerate tour was in Twickenham. (Having said that, I'm not sure it sold out, and I'm sure the Millenium Stadium was only half the stadium in around 05 ish tour).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Yokel Again said:

Can't see REM doing it - Stipe always sounds pretty adamant on the subject and it always felt they all have a bit more integrity than most, with regards to both their success and failures.

They'd still do stadiums - Accelerate tour was in Twickenham. (Having said that, I'm not sure it sold out, and I'm sure the Millenium Stadium was only half the stadium in around 05 ish tour).

Wasn't their last gig in Cardiff downgraded from the Milennium to the Cardiff City one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, CJTM said:

Reason why Macca pulled out, or was he ever booked

ahh, I've no idea if he was ever booked or trying to be booked - tho that delay in filling his USA dates over Glasto weekend was definitely very suggestive.

With a bit of luck I might get to find out if it was ever on the cards somewhen (tho don't go holding your breath).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Wasn't their last gig in Cardiff downgraded from the Milennium to the Cardiff City one?

Could well have been, they played in the arena according to setlist FM. Accelerate was a great tour though. 

Around the Sun tour - not so good, and I love them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take, going purely by what we know in terms of Neil's info, Macca's dates, the BST rumour and Emily's comments, is that they were at the very least talking to him and probably got as far as making an offer. Maybe the Eavii were hopeful/confident that it would be accepted but for whatever reason he didn't. Maybe Vegas made a better offer, maybe he simply didn't fancy coming back over here for a gig or two over two weeks and preferred to stay in the US all summer.

Edited by Hugh Jass
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PDAD said:

Wolf Alice are headlining Truck festival end of July so they are about this summer. But yeah, it could be a one off.

From their instagram:

image.thumb.png.ac1c706cdd62b057ebc1667d488846b2.png

So far they only announced Truck Festival and Standon Calling, both of which they'll headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

ahh, I've no idea if he was ever booked or trying to be booked - tho that delay in filling his USA dates over Glasto weekend was definitely very suggestive.

With a bit of luck I might get to find out if it was ever on the cards somewhen (tho don't go holding your breath).

My pal in the biz who happens to be a big Macca fan said all along he reckoned there was always more US dates after the CA ones, that's the way his team markets it... altho I intended to not pay attention as I didn't want to hear it.

Just a big tease on our behalf tho :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Wasn't their last gig in Cardiff downgraded from the Milennium to the Cardiff City one?

Downgraded to the 7k capacity CIA - now the Motorpoint.

I saw them at the Millennium Stadium in 2005 and they’d put a huge black curtain across the middle of it, effectively halving the capacity. It wasn’t a downgrade, it was always planned that way and they did a few concerts there using that, but I don’t think they do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

ahh, I've no idea if he was ever booked or trying to be booked - tho that delay in filling his USA dates over Glasto weekend was definitely very suggestive.

With a bit of luck I might get to find out if it was ever on the cards somewhen (tho don't go holding your breath).

I don't think it was at all tbf.

look at his twitter, they've been dripping out these gigs over several months. I'd imagine the Vegas gig has been booked a long time ago, acts of McCartney's size tend to begin planning and booking tour logistics over a year in advance.

GFL may well have been talking to him at some point, but I think the chances that he was ever "booked" and cancelled are almost nil. Simple explanation is that he had never signed up, never cancelled, and this gig was always planned. I can't see them signing a legally binding contract, presumably with financial implications/penalties of cancelling, and then suddenly realising that they're in the middle of a US tour and it makes better sense to play in Vegas a few days after playing down the road in Arizona.

e: And I see they've just recently added a date up the coast in Vancouver on 6th July, a week after Vegas/29th/Glasto weekend, which they would have had no reason to hold back if he was playing Glastonbury, and just further ties into the drip-feed of gigs.

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, ghostdancer1 said:

I don't think it was at all tbf.

look at his twitter, they've been dripping out these gigs over several months. I'd imagine the Vegas gig has been booked a long time ago, acts of McCartney's size tend to begin planning and booking tour logistics over a year in advance.

while dates might have dribbled out over time, they took a definite stop for a while with dates announced to just before Glasto.

it was definitely suggestive. Whether there was anything behind it is a different thing. :P 

4 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

GFL may well have been talking to him at some point, but I think the chances that he was ever "booked" and cancelled are almost nil.

oh, I don't think he was booked and cancelled.

My thinking is that if he was in the frame then they'd have been talking, but those talks didn't lead to an agreement for whatever reasons. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt many acts actually sign a contract then cancel - there are probably terms in the contract that stop them doing this apart from under certain specific circumstances (otherwise - legal consequences). Macca could have been negotiating his contract and not been happy with a certain part of it (not necessarily the fee) and chose to pull out of the negotiation before signing. I’m sure it happens frequently with the bigger stars.

Edited by Phoenix Girl
And when I say Macca, I mean his huge legal team
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phoenix Girl said:

I doubt many acts actually sign a contract then cancel - there are probably terms in the contract that stop them doing this apart from under certain specific circumstances (otherwise - legal consequences). Macca could have been negotiating his contract and not been happy with a certain part of it (not necessarily the fee) and chose to pull out of the negotiation before signing. I’m sure it happens frequently with the bigger stars.

I’m studying contract law and I have no idea lol. My guess would be that he never signed the dotted line.

I imagine most “pull outs” in the conventional sense are when the band has not signed the dotted line. Pulling out of something when you’ve signed a contract is muddy waters. I need to go back to my books

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...