Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Liam Gallagher


plaskins

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, GlastoEls said:

Please please let the strong rumour be true!

Sure it would be a mixture of the rockier Oasis tracks (ones that big brother doesn't play).

From his own stuff, it's Songbird, Born On A Different Cloud, Boy With The Blues, Flick Of The Finger...

I think some of the older Oasis stuff could appear on the setlist - Columbia, Live Forever are two that springs to mind even if they aren't his songs as such

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, dj matt james said:

I would go along to watch out of interest. Liam is a legend and has sung some of my favourite tunes of all time but the last few years on the road haven't been kind to his voice. BE sets at both Glastonbury and Heaton Park weren't great to be fair. His voice really seems to struggle. 

Agree with this sentiment exactly, and I'm really willing his new tunes to be good.

Quite apprehensive though unfortunately, hopefully proves me wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see Liam at Glastonbury - my brother is also a big fan, and it's his first Glasto.

Never saw Beady Eye, but Noel's post-Oasis gigs have been great. Guess it depends on the strength of Liam's solo work. We'll see. Songbird and I'm Outta time are both great songs.

Hopefully he's been resting his voice, and isn't going to overdo the touring. Remember thinking he didn't sound too bad at the start of the last Oasis tour in Liverpool, but was struggling by the time Heaton Park came around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

I hear Liam has claimed he wrote the songs for his solo album.

I also hear that Johnny Marr laughed - a lot - when he was told Liam had said that.

That is all. :)

Find it hard to believe at this point in his career at Liam would be going out singing songs written by someone else for his own solo album. I firmly believe he will have written all, or the majority, of the songs on the album himself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Find it hard to believe at this point in his career at Liam would be going out singing songs written by someone else for his own solo album. I firmly believe he will have written all, or the majority, of the songs on the album himself

Rumour has it Liam was touting around looking for songs to sing.  

Warner Bros (to whom he's signed) said to him: have you got any of your own stuff?  Liam mumbles yes, plays the demos to Warner, who said we'll put these out. 

What's not rumour is that Liam is also signed as of December to Warner/Chappell Music Publishing as part of that (press release in December).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, McCor said:

I'd like to hear him cover If I Had A Gun. Always thought his vocal would suit that song...

There was some talk that a few on that first album were wrote for Oasis in mind. If I had a gun and Everybodys on the run stand out as suiting Liams voice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
56 minutes ago, mufcok said:

Find it hard to believe at this point in his career at Liam would be going out singing songs written by someone else for his own solo album. I firmly believe he will have written all, or the majority, of the songs on the album himself

I don't think Marr was laughing at the idea of Liam writing songs.

I think he was laughing at the idea of what songs written by Liam would sound like.

But that's my take on it, and perhaps it was the first of those.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

I loved Oasis as a teenager in the 90's, they were a massive part of my formative years. However this is 2017 and I still have nightmares about Beady Eye's performance a couple of years ago.

For that reason I'm out.

This, pretty much. There's gotta be nothing else on at the same time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I don't think Marr was laughing at the idea of Liam writing songs.

I think he was laughing at the idea of what songs written by Liam would sound like.

But that's my take on it, and perhaps it was the first of those.

 

Johnny Marr and Liam have been in the studio before without Noel (2001) for demos which partially became the Oasis album Heathen Chemistry, which featured Songbird and a couple others written by Liam.  Johnny Marr's on the demo for Songbird which was later released as a b-side.

Marr also played on the final album, albeit on a Noel written song.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
17 minutes ago, GlastoEls said:

Johnny Marr and Liam have been in the studio before without Noel (2001) for demos which partially became the Oasis album Heathen Chemistry, which featured Songbird and a couple others written by Liam.  Johnny Marr's on the demo for Songbird which was later released as a b-side.

Marr also played on the final album, albeit on a Noel written song.

 

which probably has a lot to do with Marr's laughter at the thought of Liam's songwriting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...