Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

This is something I stick on fairly regularly. Watching them up close, making that sound, just shows they are at the top of their game to me. While some of their output hasn't been to my taste, there is no doubting the sheer talent they possess.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhzQzyJUJTQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't know Stevie Wonder's stuff, who do you know?

That sounds arsey, I don't mean it to, I am actually intrigued. Probably because for me he is in my top 5 acts ever. When he was announced I couldn't believe it. Hw is someone me and all my mates had grown up hearing all the time.

Well I guess the equivalent for me would be The Cure? My favourite band & a lot of their back catalogue is instantly recognisable to me. Or The Clash. Or QOTSA. Or Arctic Monkeys.

Dunno. There are loads of bands I know in depth who I wouldn't expect other people to. It's not that I don't like Stevie Wonder - I do & I'd love to see him. And it's not the I don't like soul/motown/disco & all that, just I don't know anyone in any depth so although I've heard a lot of the 'classics' or whatever I wouldn't know who sung them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At no point did I ask for Stones or Arcade Fire on John Peel,

I did not say you did

I think you've missed what I'm trying to say.

Yeah I must have. I thought your generalization was saying the Pyramid is for people who dont like gigs. Whereas I was saying the Pyramid is not about the people who go to it, but its about the acts that play it. They Pyramid is for big acts....................and plenty of gig loving folk will go to the Pyramid to see certain big acts

BTW just as an FYI, as I know you dont venture to it too often, plenty of gigs on the Pyramid have zero spectacle to them. Its just the act, speakers, & screens..............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was young I wouldnt have admitted not knowing classic, seminal tunes at all, I would have quietly gone out and borrowed a copy of songs in the key of life from the library and listened to it.

Maybe I was overly pretentious as a teen, in fact scratch the maybe but this surely isnt unheard of.

I was amazed when one of my team members at work admitted to not knowing a single Stones track, it took me ages to get over, I almost made it one of his yearly development goals such was my shock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing a Pyramid Headliner is a chance to experience something different. At intimate gigs you can stand close enough to see the nosehairs of the bassist of Crispy Ambulance any day of the week.

Twice on Saturdays.

Thats a band I never thought I would see mentioned on here. The only band more famous for their singer standing in for another band than they are for their own music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Pyramid can produce brilliant moments. Okay, most of the time it's about lights, lazers etc. and less about performance. But, if you get a seriously good act on there, an excited crowd etc. then it has the potential to be special.

Doesn't help much that my first Sunday headliner was Stevie Wonder, who blew the place away. Such a great party atmosphere too, felt like a fitting end to the (completely!) sunny week. Blur the year before enticed me to go to Glastonbury in the first place too, just looked like such a great place to be.

2015 will be no. 5 for me, and its true you do veer away from the Pyramid a bit (where as when I was a newbie it was a little bit more important) . In fact most of the time I'm glad to be able to go elsewhere and explore. But it's nice to have the odd headline act which causes a little bit of intrigue or anticipation, due to these 'moments'. 2015, if its Coldplay - Swift - FFs headlining, will be the first year where I know all of the bookings are safe and no 'thrills' or shocks will really occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At no point did I ask for Stones or Arcade Fire on John Peel, I'm well aware of why big acts need to be on the Pyramid, I think you've missed what I'm trying to say. My point is that the Pyramid experience is not your typical live music experience, Glastonbury is full of people who don't go to see bands the rest of the year, those people turn up for the big spectacle on the Pyramid. Sometimes that spectacle is good (in the case of The Stones and Arcade Fire), but if you're not into the band playing, and you like live music, why get upset about it? The Pyramid is not the be all end all of live music, it's actually a much different beast to what 99% of live shows are, and if that's your thing, you're far more likely to get it on the smaller stages than the Pyramid. The Pyramid is there for people to chant together and wave glowsticks, that's absolutely fine, there's room in the fest for all sorts.

Glastonbury festival as a whole and the pyramid stage is a place for the casual music fan. I don't know why people over complicate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I guess the equivalent for me would be The Cure? My favourite band & a lot of their back catalogue is instantly recognisable to me. Or The Clash. Or QOTSA. Or Arctic Monkeys.

Dunno. There are loads of bands I know in depth who I wouldn't expect other people to. It's not that I don't like Stevie Wonder - I do & I'd love to see him. And it's not the I don't like soul/motown/disco & all that, just I don't know anyone in any depth so although I've heard a lot of the 'classics' or whatever I wouldn't know who sung them.

The Clash and QOTSA are high on my lists too. The cure - not so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a note to put here ....

There's been mentions of Coldplay as a possibility in plenty of different publications, but as yet I've not seen anywhere stating with confidence that it's Coldplay.

If everything runs as it normally does, over the next few weeks publications everywhere will be talking about Coldplay as one of the headliners as a certainty.

It's normally the case that media everywhere take a statement by efests as on the money.

(so I bloody well hope we are on the money :lol:).

does this count as 'stating with confidence': http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/glastonbury-2015-lineup-foo-fighters-and-coldplay-named-favourites-to-headline-10023255.html
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The majority of the acts on the Pyramid are, on average, utter tripe the headliners no exception. Yes it's shit that Coldplay are headlining again, but as the massive cliche goes, there's plenty of other things to do on site.

Also I have to say it, Stevie Wonder is a boring God-botherer. Glad we've cleared that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am beginning to tire a little of finding out there is other stuff on at Glastonbury while the headliners on. We know but we're on a long thread talking about headliners in February so we obviously too invested for the headliners to be utter shit. :P

Think the reason I'm always disappointed when a headliner isn't to my taste is because that's the big high profile slot. The biggest likelyhood of them having a massive name so when it's someone not too my taste it is slightly disappointing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...