Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Metallica worked because of the whole 'first metal band to headline Glastonbury' thing. yes they'd been fucking everywhere all the time, but nobody thought they'd ever be at Glastonbury

The Cure would go down a treat at Glastonbury - along with Bestival, probably the best UK festival for them. but i just don't reckon they'll be booked any time soon without a successful album to back / a real reason for them to headline. plus their sets tend to be like 3 hours long with Glastonbury isn't likely to accommodate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

The crowd was very sparse at Leeds, a lot of people I spoke to were outright annoyed that they'd been booked (the teenagers). I reckon they'd go down a lot better at Glastonbury, and 4:13 Scream is supposed to be on the way...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Not bothered about Fleetwood Mac being demoted myself, but I know lots on here really want them to, so that's a little disappointing for those people.

2. Why would AC/DC playing mean Fleetwood Mac aren't?

3. Where did Neil make that AC/DC post? Was it in here? I never saw it.

4. Did Eavis say The Cure aren't big enough? I thought he said something like "They were rubbish last time they played so why should we book them again?".

5. Please be The Cure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing with Fleetwood for me is even though I'm not a huge fan I'd like to see them but not to the extent of paying for their own gig so Glasto would be a good substitute and would like to see them at least once before they call it quits so quite gutted they're not almost a definite now :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its not ACDC what are the odds on the who?

I was wondering about the possibility of the who. Their 2007 set seems to have been mostly forgotten due to weather but Id love to see them at Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see Mr Eavis seeing The Cure as an exciting headliner. In the heat of their moment they may have been great which is why they have headlined thrice. But now in a time when the festival is trying to get new, different headliners or favourites like Muse, Arctic Monkeys I can't see them falling into the radar.

I find them a little bit boring, and was disinterested by seeing them at Reading so I went the NME stage. I saw a whole 2 bands in the time they were playing and came to the Mainstage and the atmosphere seemed a little flat. I think they do a too long set.

Edited by willutalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see Mr Eavis seeing The Cure as an exciting headliner. In the heat of their moment they may have been great which is why they have headlined thrice. But now in a time when the festival is trying to get new, different headliners or favourites like Muse, Arctic Monkeys I can't see them falling into the radar.

I find them a little bit boring, and was disinterested by seeing them at Reading so I went the NME stage. I saw a whole 2 bands in the time they were playing and came to the Mainstage and the atmosphere seemed a little flat. I think they do a too long set.

I can understand non-fans finding it overdrawn, personally I adored their set at Reading, but that's why I'm hesitant about them at Glastonbury. Though with them successfully headlining Bestival and R&L, Eavis might change his mind them if he's sttuggling to book another legend status headliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see the cure or the who headlining.

I don't think the who will play again, they're one of those big legend acts who've done it already, it's not like they have new material everyone is dying to hear so I don't think they'll play again.

I just don't see the cure having the current appeal to headline the pyramid. They would probably draw a dedicated crowd and go down a storm headlining the other though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth. The Cure are one of the most universally liked bands of everyone I know. Almost every fan of alternative/guitar music enjoys The Cure, right?

There are those with no soul who don't like them...

With the sets The Cure play atm, I can't see it going down well on the Pyramid for most as fantastic as it would be. (I thought they was fantastic at Reading, mesmerising infact but the crowd was a bit meh for large parts of the set :P)

Edited by LondonTom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite what I said about everyone liking The Cure, when they headlined Leeds I did wander off in the middle to catch a bit of Sleigh Bells (was very into them at the time, wasn't down to The Cure being poor) and then came back to see the end. Overall I probably saw the first hour or so and then the encore and it was incredible. This was the setlist I saw.

  1. Tape
  2. Encore:
Missed about 12 songs after Friday I'm In Love and, as a fan but not obsessive, I only recognise 2 of those songs from the title (A Forest and Wrong Number). That setlist would go down a storm at Glasto.
Edited by Bradders
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems that Adele is tipped to be touring her new album next year. Top of the Eavises list isn't she?

As long as they can magically cure these mysterious nerves which appear at festivals but not the Oscars, the Grammys, the Brit Awards or a tour she's nailed on surely..

Edited by Zac Quinn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Adele's touring I see no reason why she wouldn't be doing Glasto if the primary reason was her stage fright. Suppose it depends on how big her tour's going to be though.

Foo Fighters

Radiohead

Adele

Money? Doesn't want to do it? /crowd is to big etc. ...There are plenty of reasons..

Edited by LondonTom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More of an unlikely prediction but

Fri

Muse

Bjork

Damon Albarn

Lorde

George Ezra

Sat

Fleetwood Mac

Morissey

Jake Bugg

Alt - J

Haim

Sunday

Florence + The Machine

Noel Gallagher

Two door cinema club

Elton John

Cant see Jake Bugg or HAIM being there next year myself, also cannot see Flo headlining.

Reckon Alt J would be higher or headline a stage, too big for John Peel??

Biffy Clyro

Florence and the Machine

Fleetwood Mac

NGHFB

Prince

Example

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant see Jake Bugg or HAIM being there next year myself, also cannot see Flo headlining.

Reckon Alt J would be higher or headline a stage, too big for John Peel??

Biffy Clyro

Florence and the Machine

Fleetwood Mac

NGHFB

Prince

Example

I'd say Alt-J are too big for John Peel, 3rd down on Pyramid or very high (subbing or headlining) Other stage.

Also, I'd be really surprised if Florence plays next year and doesn't headline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...