Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

If Adele does go on tour then I reckon there's a massive chance of her headlining, Emily really wants her, and she's a professional at getting big guns rolled out. Adele and Fleetwood Mac may be beige as fuck, but it's bloody big ticket, couple that with Radiohead and it'd be an absolute bumper year for Pyramid headliners, 2016 would be a nightmare for tickets.

And The Cure are an outstanding live act, anybody who thinks they wouldn't storm the Pyramid is the crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

More of an unlikely prediction but

Fri

Muse

Bjork

Damon Albarn

Lorde

George Ezra

Sat

Fleetwood Mac

Morissey

Jake Bugg

Alt - J

Haim

Sunday

Florence + The Machine

Noel Gallagher

Two door cinema club

Elton John

I'd say it's more likely that Bjork would headline Other subbed by Lorde on the Friday.

Agree I can't see HAIM or Bugg there next year.

I'm not sure Florence would be above Noel Gallagher, and Elton would be headlining if he appeared, so I'm not sure where that would leave the others.

Edited by kalifire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant see Jake Bugg or HAIM being there next year myself, also cannot see Flo headlining.

Reckon Alt J would be higher or headline a stage, too big for John Peel??

Biffy Clyro

Florence and the Machine

Fleetwood Mac

NGHFB

Prince

Example

I'd say Alt-J are too big for John Peel, 3rd down on Pyramid or very high (subbing or headlining) Other stage.

Also, I'd be really surprised if Florence plays next year and doesn't headline.

I know they're massive and their last album huge pending their second album but are they really bigger then Kaiser Chiefs or MGMT who headlined the John Peel this year? Or Phoenix of last year? I'd say headlining John Peel tent would be perfect for them! Either that or high up on Pyramid or the Other as aforementioned!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they're massive and their last album huge pending their second album but are they really bigger then Kaiser Chiefs or MGMT who headlined the John Peel this year? Or Phoenix of last year? I'd say headlining John Peel tent would be perfect for them! Either that or high up on Pyramid or the Other as aforementioned!

they're far bigger imo. Kaisers have had a surge of popularity lately, yeah, but are still a shadow of what they once were size-wise. MGMT... no question that Alt-J are bigger. and Phoenix aren't that big in the UK. Alt-J will (unfortunately) be huge once the new album is released. i reckon Other sub. headlining seems like a push (although once the new album's out it may seem just right - just like many were predicting Mumfords to headline Other in 2013 before the new album was released)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they're far bigger imo. Kaisers have had a surge of popularity lately, yeah, but are still a shadow of what they once were size-wise. MGMT... no question that Alt-J are bigger. and Phoenix aren't that big in the UK. Alt-J will (unfortunately) be huge once the new album is released. i reckon Other sub. headlining seems like a push (although once the new album's out it may seem just right - just like many were predicting Mumfords to headline Other in 2013 before the new album was released)

I was thinking more along the lines of in the general public whose songs are better known. Some songs by MGMT & especially Kaiser Chiefs are much better known than Alt-J. I can see where you're coming from though, I suppose crowd wise & Glastonbury-wise Alt-J may be the biggest draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant see Jake Bugg or HAIM being there next year myself, also cannot see Flo headlining.

Reckon Alt J would be higher or headline a stage, too big for John Peel??

Biffy Clyro

Florence and the Machine

Fleetwood Mac

NGHFB

Prince

Example

I'd say Alt-J are too big for John Peel, 3rd down on Pyramid or very high (subbing or headlining) Other stage.

Also, I'd be really surprised if Florence plays next year and doesn't headline.

Didn't Alt J sub other last year, so would expect them to have a bigger slot next time.

I think Alt-J could be anywhere from 3rd/4th on the Pyramid to low on the Other depending on how their next album goes. I think mid pyramid is most likely though. Maybe even headlining somewhere like west holts if the album goes well? If the they go for less traditional acts again like this year that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Alt J sub other last year, so would expect them to have a bigger slot next time.

I thought they were middle of the day until checking again and they were third down on Other. They'll likely be Pyramid sub/third or nothing at all then. Returning to Other would be a bit pointless and they'll be too big for anywhere else.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought they were middle of the day until checking again and they were third down on Other. They'll likely be Pyramid sub/third or nothing at all then. Returning to Other would be a bit pointless and they'll be too big for anywhere else.

Unless they headline it of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money? Doesn't want to do it? /crowd is to big etc. ...There are plenty of reasons..

Adele doesn't strike me as someone who's that arsed about money to be honest & if she's doing a big tour in big venues I think shed be able to hack the crowd at Glasto.

I take your point about not wanting to do it but I'm sure if you were asked to headline the Pyramid you'd be right up for it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adele doesn't strike me as someone who's that arsed about money to be honest

You are joking, right?

"I'm mortified to have to pay 50%! [While] I use the NHS, I can't use public transport any more. Trains are always late, most state schools are shit, and I've gotta give you, like, four million quid – are you having a laugh? When I got my tax bill in from [the album] 19, I was ready to go and buy a gun and randomly open fire."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adele doesn't strike me as someone who's that arsed about money to be honest & if she's doing a big tour in big venues I think shed be able to hack the crowd at Glasto.

I take your point about not wanting to do it but I'm sure if you were asked to headline the Pyramid you'd be right up for it!

I'll leave money to the others, but unless her show includes Wembley Stadium, its not like Glastonbury at all really. Its 20,000 vs. potentially 80,000 at the Pyramid!

Not saying she won't do it, just trying to say its not such a sure thing that if she tours she will do Glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll leave money to the others, but unless her show includes Wembley Stadium, its not like Glastonbury at all really. Its 20,000 vs. potentially 80,000 at the Pyramid!

Not saying she won't do it, just trying to say its not such a sure thing that if she tours she will do Glastonbury.

But if she wants big money, she needs to play the big gigs. And we now know she wants big money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But she gets big money from album/single sales, so she doesn't really need to.

£8m on a good year through sales is the same as a few nights at Wembley Stadium is it not? Worth getting some sort of coaching to overcome the perceived stage fright.

not really no

Why does nobody do it then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are joking, right?

"I'm mortified to have to pay 50%! [While] I use the NHS, I can't use public transport any more. Trains are always late, most state schools are shit, and I've gotta give you, like, four million quid – are you having a laugh? When I got my tax bill in from [the album] 19, I was ready to go and buy a gun and randomly open fire."

Didn't know that, I knew she was an overrated shouter, but this highlights what a selfish specimen she is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...