Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Site changes for 27


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

This seems to be the key bit that Skip's post contradicts

 

"We’ve been told separately by Glastonbury’s management that there isn’t an interest in replacing us or desire to have a craft area at the festival anymore, which we felt it only right to share. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

This seems to be the key bit that Skip's post contradicts

 

"We’ve been told separately by Glastonbury’s management that there isn’t an interest in replacing us or desire to have a craft area at the festival anymore, which we felt it only right to share. "

I guess lots of different talks and whispers from various people involved in the area going around ... hopefully an area that remains , although Its always an area I intend to use as a creative sadly I havent over the years its lovely to wander through and its not quite so manic as other areas of the festival and more than had its place 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s a very confusing post and based on what I know it only partially makes sense to me. As already stated I have recently been party to conversations and correspondence regarding the future of Glastonbury festival Green Crafts. To the best of my knowledge the current situation is that the, now previous, coordinators of this area have effectively been sacked and replacements are being interviewed. I suspect the above was written by them.

 

 I have no knowledge of the existence of an overall organisation called “Green Crafts”. To the best of my knowledge events such as The Green Gathering and Shambala will include a Green Crafts area this year and I know that they are not organised by any overall organisation. I know the organiser of the Green Gathering craft field personally.

 

A few years back my immediate boss at Glastonbury had a conversation with Michael in which he suggested that the Green Fields would be the first victim in changes to the festival. Michael’s response was “not while I’m still alive”. The Green Fields are still seen as an integral part of the festival by several of those at the top.

 

 Again I suspect this is a scare story put out by the previous coordinators and I would take it with several “pinches of salt”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

This seems to be the key bit that Skip's post contradicts

 

"We’ve been told separately by Glastonbury’s management that there isn’t an interest in replacing us or desire to have a craft area at the festival anymore, which we felt it only right to share. "


I’ve been told personally by the very long standing managers of the Green Fields that they are looking for new Craft Field coordinators and was asked to make suggestions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Field will still be there but under new management I think skip is right ( and person who forwarded it confirms ) despite the letter contents 

 

edit added bit in brackets 

Edited by Crazyfool01
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

I have no knowledge of the existence of an overall organisation called “Green Crafts”. To the best of my knowledge events such as The Green Gathering and Shambala will include a Green Crafts area this year and I know that they are not organised by any overall organisation. I know the organiser of the Green Gathering craft field personally.

 

https://greencraftsvillage.com/

 

Greencrafts were the first to bring large-scale hands-on craft areas to big music festivals in both the UK and Ireland; founding the first ever Greencrafts area at Glastonbury in 1993. Greencrafts coined the name and term ‘Greencrafts’ and later ‘Greencrafts Village’, and have led the way on how craft can find a home within the festival context for the last 32 years. They continue to build on this legacy and pave the way.

 

Greencrafts’ Directors were founding members of the Big Green Gathering Festival; and founded the craft field there in 1994, running the area for 14 years from 1994-2008.

 

The Greencrafts Village Facebook Page

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

https://greencraftsvillage.com/

 

Greencrafts were the first to bring large-scale hands-on craft areas to big music festivals in both the UK and Ireland; founding the first ever Greencrafts area at Glastonbury in 1993. Greencrafts coined the name and term ‘Greencrafts’ and later ‘Greencrafts Village’, and have led the way on how craft can find a home within the festival context for the last 32 years. They continue to build on this legacy and pave the way.

 

Greencrafts’ Directors were founding members of the Big Green Gathering Festival; and founded the craft field there in 1994, running the area for 14 years from 1994-2008.

 

The Greencrafts Village Facebook Page

 

So they are/were involved in a very small number of events. There rant suggests this is the end of Green Crafts at festivals, this is not the case.

 

 I fully expect Green Crafts to be at Glastonbury in 2027, just with new management 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

Lots of politics and other stuff. Not comfortable saying more 

 

I would have thought you'd be on the other side of the fence with this to be honest.  It seems like another Melvin/Emily effect to me - something that you're usually quite vocal about.

 

Greencrafts were axed from Wilderness last year after being there since it's founding days, not replaced.  Sounds a bit suspicious! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

I would have thought you'd be on the other side of the fence with this to be honest.  It seems like another Melvin/Emily effect to me - something that you're usually quite vocal about.

 

Greencrafts were axed from Wilderness last year after being there since it's founding days, not replaced.  Sounds a bit suspicious! 

This is not a Melvin/Emily thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not against change, and while i really like the green fields and the green craft bit specifically, when you've been to more than a couple of festivals it is quite stark how little it changes from year to year. Pretty much every area in the glastonbury site has either been updated, changed or refitted in the last decade-ish, and its just swinging round to this area now. I'm sure there's people who feel their toes are being trodden on but things have to evolve, and not just be recreated to within a couple of inches every summer season - atrophy is death innit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apologies if this seems controversial, but it’s felt to me like wasted festival space in recent years. There comes a point where there’s a disconnect between what stalwarts sense is

at the heart of the festival and what’s born out by foot traffic on the ground. I’ve visited the crafts field plenty of times but only to pass through it - not to partake - and it’s been fairly empty each time. 
 

For a festival where every square inch of land matters, it’s always felt like a waste of space to me. I’m not suggesting there’s an either/or between traditional use of field space and corporate sponsorship or glamping, but land that’s being populated and utilised is surely better than land for the sake of tradition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like its not going / maybe it is, but new life could help it.

 

Team Love taking over silver hayes did a world of good for instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kalifire said:

Apologies if this seems controversial, but it’s felt to me like wasted festival space in recent years. There comes a point where there’s a disconnect between what stalwarts sense is

at the heart of the festival and what’s born out by foot traffic on the ground. I’ve visited the crafts field plenty of times but only to pass through it - not to partake - and it’s been fairly empty each time. 
 

For a festival where every square inch of land matters, it’s always felt like a waste of space to me. I’m not suggesting there’s an either/or between traditional use of field space and corporate sponsorship or glamping, but land that’s being populated and utilised is surelybetter than land for the sake of tradition. 

does every inch of the festival site need to be heaving ? the workshops I think are always busy , you remove creative areas such as this it discourages creativity as a whole with people unable to have space to do certain things that also has other impacts . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gfa said:

It sounds like its not going / maybe it is, but new life could help it.

 

Team Love taking over silver hayes did a world of good for instance.

agree a refresh and some new ideas might be a good thing also 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crazyfool01 said:

does every inch of the festival site need to be heaving ? the workshops I think are always busy , you remove creative areas such as this it discourages creativity as a whole with people unable to have space to do certain things that also has other impacts . 


No, of course not every area needs to be heaving. Personally, I spend a decent amount of time each Glasto chilling out in those upper fields because relentless busyness stresses me out. But the festival has to consider return on investment per field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kalifire said:


No, of course not every area needs to be heaving. Personally, I spend a decent amount of time each Glasto chilling out in those upper fields because relentless busyness stresses me out. But the festival has to consider return on investment per field.

I just think there doesnt need to be the relentless push for what is deemed value for money the festival does pretty well with its pretty wide offering and provides something for everyone , so that in its own way is a return on investment ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kalifire said:

But the festival has to consider return on investment per field.

 

No.

 

In fact, one of the things that makes Glastonbury great is that it doesn't always do that and sometimes does things just because they want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we begin to, hypothetically, look at areas on a return on investment and judge this by footfall, then we would also have to consider: the Healing Field, Permaculture and even Acoustic Stage (often relatively quiet so I’m told). All these areas are integral to the ethos of the festival. Sure this may happen one day, but not as I’ve been told “as long as I’m still alive” (ME). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

If we begin to, hypothetically, look at areas on a return on investment and judge this by footfall, then we would also have to consider: the Healing Field, Permaculture and even Acoustic Stage (often relatively quiet so I’m told). All these areas are integral to the ethos of the festival. Sure this may happen one day, but not as I’ve been told “as long as I’m still alive” (ME). 

Exactly - there is talk on here that sounds like a bunch of corporate shills who consider the price of everything over it's value. Glasto have more than enough estate to deliver their groundbreaking stuff over their 'traditional'. But hey, let's keep an eye on what happens politically over what actually transpires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I phrased my last post poorly. I wasn’t suggesting that the festival eeks out every last penny from every last bit of land on the basis of profit. Of course the fields mentioned are historically a core part of the heart of the event. But they also need to resonate with the attendees or they just exist because they always have, which might be lovely in terms of tradition but isn’t necessarily the best use of land. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...