Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I think it means playing another english festival but not headlining (glasto)

 

People might cry for me mentioning rumours from the discord again but been said for a couple weeks there that she is subing O Rod on the sunday. This is now way more likely.

Yeah we got a few bits that she was subbing ORod but all kind of doubted it because we also had info she was headlining Reading/Leeds and assumed she’d be a UK exclusive or something. She isn’t, and there aren’t many other places she could realistically pop up in a non-headlining position, so that looks very good for Glastonbury (and a massive booking for them too given her trajectory). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really was tempted to put BMTH on my newest lineup prediction as Other headliner but looks like they’re an R&L exclusive which makes Loyle/Charli/The Prodigy much more secure. Wonder if they could be in headliner contention after the fallow?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, archiegow said:

Really was tempted to put BMTH on my newest lineup prediction as Other headliner but looks like they’re an R&L exclusive which makes Loyle/Charli/The Prodigy much more secure. Wonder if they could be in headliner contention after the fallow?

I'd love to see BMTH headline glasto but it feels like they're currently missing some 'big' commercial songs that a lot of the audience would know. And I say that as a massive BMTH fan.

 

Then again they're a British band that's worked their way up festival line-ups relentlessly, if their commercial peak gets any higher than it is right now, then I'd say they absolutely do deserve to headline the pyramid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, fullfathom5 said:


This is what confuses me, I know some have said she’s Sunday, but it seems to me Saturday is better suited. I dunno???


 

Like how did it go from Neil Young and senior Sunday to Olivia and Chappell crashing the olds party. So its gonna be the Powerpop Girls, Olivia and The 1975 as the most anti Taylor lineup you could think of lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Suprefan said:


 

Like how did it go from Neil Young and senior Sunday to Olivia and Chappell crashing the olds party. So its gonna be the Powerpop Girls, Olivia and The 1975 as the most anti Taylor lineup you could think of lol.

Literally no different than 2022 with McCartney Saturday and Kendrick Sunday. 
 

Only thing tripping it up is that ORod generally (possibly never?) does three days in a row which she’d be doing here, so I dunno, maybe there’s been crossed wires somewhere, but the info thus far has specifically been Neil Saturday, ORod/Chappell Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FloopFiller said:

Literally no different than 2022 with McCartney Saturday and Kendrick Sunday. 
 

Only thing tripping it up is that ORod generally (possibly never?) does three days in a row which she’d be doing here, so I dunno, maybe there’s been crossed wires somewhere, but the info thus far has specifically been Neil Saturday, ORod/Chappell Sunday.


 

Well its more that we had Olivia pretty much locked in for Saturday til just now. Thats what gets me. Even Billie when she did 22 had a big run of shows on either side and still managed a day off. But I will assume because she has so many days off leading up since Pinkpop is the 21st, Ireland the 24th and Bst the 27, that she is comfortable at doing it because after that its only 2 gigs a few days later after the 3 in a row  and then 5 days off and a week off. Its not a lot of shows but theyre spread out. 
 

So now theres gonna be this interesting flux of people camped out for Chappell and O Ros on Sunday and theyre gonna be surrounded people who wanna see Rod and Nile. Thats kind of the other contrast you look at. Like lets say Sabrina subs Neil? Wtf is that. Or she is under The 1975 which is the only sensible move here. Is the surprise Oasis set before Neil then so you kinda make sure he keeps a crowd and not everyone rams it for Charli?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


 

Well its more that we had Olivia pretty much locked in for Saturday til just now. Thats what gets me. Even Billie when she did 22 had a big run of shows on either side and still managed a day off. But I will assume because she has so many days off leading up since Pinkpop is the 21st, Ireland the 24th and Bst the 27, that she is comfortable at doing it because after that its only 2 gigs a few days later after the 3 in a row  and then 5 days off and a week off. Its not a lot of shows but theyre spread out. 
 

So now theres gonna be this interesting flux of people camped out for Chappell and O Ros on Sunday and theyre gonna be surrounded people who wanna see Rod and Nile. Thats kind of the other contrast you look at. Like lets say Sabrina subs Neil? Wtf is that. Or she is under The 1975 which is the only sensible move here. Is the surprise Oasis set before Neil then so you kinda make sure he keeps a crowd and not everyone rams it for Charli?

Think the best guess is that ORod was originally pencilled in for the Saturday which would line up with her dates either side but they’ve had to move things around, possibly to accommodate the third headliner being a late addition (Neil, or whoever it ends up being). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Suprefan said:


 

Well its more that we had Olivia pretty much locked in for Saturday til just now. Thats what gets me. Even Billie when she did 22 had a big run of shows on either side and still managed a day off. But I will assume because she has so many days off leading up since Pinkpop is the 21st, Ireland the 24th and Bst the 27, that she is comfortable at doing it because after that its only 2 gigs a few days later after the 3 in a row  and then 5 days off and a week off. Its not a lot of shows but theyre spread out. 
 

So now theres gonna be this interesting flux of people camped out for Chappell and O Ros on Sunday and theyre gonna be surrounded people who wanna see Rod and Nile. Thats kind of the other contrast you look at. Like lets say Sabrina subs Neil? Wtf is that. Or she is under The 1975 which is the only sensible move here. Is the surprise Oasis set before Neil then so you kinda make sure he keeps a crowd and not everyone rams it for Charli?


Has there been any mention of a surprise oasis set? I'm assuming that is satire rather than any rumour to back that up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, incident said:

 

She's subbing R&L, and we've had acts in the exact same position before (including recently).


Yeah fair enough, would be a great booking. Was potentially thinking of R&L because of Chappell so might hold off if that’s the case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, incident said:

 

She's subbing R&L, and we've had acts in the exact same position before (including recently).

She's headlining R&L but subbing Glasto

 

9 minutes ago, foolee said:

Surely we aren’t getting Chappell Roan when she’s headlining R&L? 

She's an 'english headline exclusive' which suggests she is playing another english festival not headlining. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fraybentos1 said:

She's headlining R&L but subbing Glasto

 

If she was *actually* headlining R&L, they wouldn't allow her to play Glastonbury.

 

She's subbing, they can pretend otherwise but we should be better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...