Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Wait, has Fred been bounced now? 

 

A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one, etc, etc. 

 

No, I think it's more that there's no concrete info (unless I've missed something).

 

It makes complete sense, in theory, but who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

To be fair feel sorry for Dave Grohl -  Obviously what he has done is sh*tty -  but compared to the behaviour of some of his fellow rockstars who have has nowhere near the same negative coverage for equal or worse behavioir seems very disproportionate in terms of negative coverage  

 

I don't think anyone else in tbe industry has this true gent of rock persona about him though. Others haven't exactly hidden their multiple female relations nor have they cared its known...because it's rock and roll.

 

The feeling I get with grohl is he's almost hidden behind it and the last person you expect. Like he's first to speak up at his gigs if stuff kicks off etc and taking the moral responsibility to stop it etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2024 at 10:14 PM, Suprefan said:

 Sold out a stadium tour this year over here. Thus why he is doing Bst. 

Can't wait for the Bad Bunny BST date!

 

1 hour ago, Ben7amin_ said:

To be fair feel sorry for Dave Grohl -  Obviously what he has done is sh*tty -  but compared to the behaviour of some of his fellow rockstars who have has nowhere near the same negative coverage for equal or worse behavioir seems very disproportionate in terms of negative coverage  

whataboutism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, StoneCircle said:

 

Michael Eavis is a member of the Methodist church and has deep religious beliefs. These have probably been passed down to his children.

But was this an actual factor during bookings in the past decades? I never got the impression that their religious beliefs were relevant to the fest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, gfa said:

Can't wait for the Bad Bunny BST date!

 

whataboutism

 

Woah. I mean yeah whataboutism poor use of that. 

 

I mean if you think what Dave Grohl did should be treated as worse than say rapists or acts that sex with minors etc.... when it comes to being booked by a festival...

 

Seriously have a look at yourself. 

Edited by AVALON.G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, FKA SOSOTWS said:

 

No, because cheating on your wife isn't at the same level of sexual abuse.

 

But Foo Fighters shouldn't be playing Glasto again regardless of what Grohl did.

Read what you quote.

 

Obviously he doesn't deserve worst coverage than rapists - but what I quoted said 'equal' as well.

 

I guess I wasn't completely clear, but thought that part would be obvious!

 

but compared to the behaviour of some of his fellow rockstars who have has nowhere near the same negative coverage for equal or worse behavioir seems very disproportionate in terms of negative coverage  

 

@AVALON.G see above and consider an apology.

Edited by gfa
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, gfa said:

Read what you quote.

 

Obviously he doesn't deserve worst coverage than rapists - but what I quoted said 'equal' as well.

 

I guess I wasn't completely clear, but thought that part would be obvious!

 

but compared to the behaviour of some of his fellow rockstars who have has nowhere near the same negative coverage for equal or worse behavioir seems very disproportionate in terms of negative coverage  

 

@AVALON.G see above and consider an apology.

 

Ii stand by my comment. Highlighting the word equal does not make or worse bit of the Sentence disappear. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by AVALON.G
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

Interesting. 

 

Wonder if Snow Patrol move up Other consideration with Latitude now. 

 

They actually headlined Latitude quite recently 2022 the once and only time i will go to that festival - its a prime kind of headliner that suits a crowd that at the same festival could take 0 interest in acts like Little Simz, Mdou Moctar, Self Esteem, Kae Tempest.   They love the Beige at latitude 

Edited by Ben7amin_
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ben7amin_ said:

THink the Rolling Stones have a fair few out of wedlock kids between them. this will not be an issue. 

 

One of them has even slept with a few minors 

 

The Stones have always been portrayed as womanisers in the media. Dave hasn't put a foot wrong before, he had a reputation as being the nicest rock star. 

 

1 hour ago, FKA SOSOTWS said:

But was this an actual factor during bookings in the past decades? I never got the impression that their religious beliefs were relevant to the fest.

 

I doubt it, but I get the impression that Dave had become a friend as has Chris Martin and accepted into the inner sanctuary of Worthy Farm. He was valued by the family, not just a booking for the festival.

Edited by StoneCircle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, StoneCircle said:

I doubt it, but I get the impression that Dave had become a friend as has Chris Martin and accepted into the inner sanctuary of Worthy Farm. He was valued by the family, not just a booking for the festival.

 

Fair, I'll admit to not knowing anything about the Methodist Church and what that would entail for interpersonal relationships. I would hope the Eavis' are able to forgive Grohl at a friendship level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Isn’t it all about forgiveness? 

 

Funny how most doctrines seem to major on forgiveness, but zealous followers ignore it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AVALON.G said:

 

Ii stand by my comment. Highlighting the word equal does not make or worse bit of the Sentence disappear. 

 

 

 

 

I am sorry that what I said was unclear but I did not mean this. I would never suggest that and have made that very clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Are people seriously suggesting an artist shouldn’t play if they’ve had an affair out of wedlock? Who does that leave us with? Daniel O’Donnell and Cliff Richard 

Cliff?
remember the words of living doll?  Bondage and kidnap not exactly Christian values😉😊

 

’Gonna lock her up in a trunk

so no big hunk

Steals her away from me’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, henry bear said:

Are people seriously suggesting an artist shouldn’t play if they’ve had an affair out of wedlock? Who does that leave us with? Daniel O’Donnell and Cliff Richard 

 

Sadly even the former is too spicy for Glastonbury 

 

Irish legend Daniel O'Donnell says he's ready for an affair -

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/irish-legend-daniel-odonnell-says-20927750?utm_source=whatsapp&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=shareb

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Isn’t it all about forgiveness? 

''Methodists believe that forgiving others can be a life-transforming and liberating act.''

 

Who can argue with that? A good philosophy too often ignored in society's/media's love of a scandal.

Edited by Avalon_Fields
edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...