Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

The SznPAreonly offeringscottish nurses1%too. I have lots of sympthy fotr nurses at the moment they are having to deal with me. 

Me too, they should clearly be getting a much bigger pay rise with all things considered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

Awful - that sort of thing angers me so much. Pharmaceutical profits over lives

Is this as straightforwards as it seems though? I can understand that Pfizer don't want other people to make their vaccine as they want the money off it. But the Oxford/AZ jab is different, because it's not being sold at a profit. If we dropped the patent restrictions, that would then *allow* other pharmaceutical companies to sell it at a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Is this as straightforwards as it seems though? I can understand that Pfizer don't want other people to make their vaccine as they want the money off it. But the Oxford/AZ jab is different, because it's not being sold at a profit. If we dropped the patent restrictions, that would then *allow* other pharmaceutical companies to sell it at a profit.

From what I remember in an article a few months ago, The original intent of the scientists behind the Oxford jab was to make it patent free, but the gvt hooked them up with AZ as they needed them to mass produce it etc, and one of the requirements of that deal was to drop the patent waiving idea but do it at cost price instead (while the pandemic is ongoing, maybe they're allowed to start charging more for future holiday vaccinations etc). 

I could understand the hesitation to waive patents if they were worried about quality control, maybe even a worry about a race for ingredients etc, but sadly I think it is mainly about profits long term,though I could be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mellotr0n said:

 

 

By my count, that puts us within spitting distance of 50% of the Adult population having first doses - maybe even over it if the NI number is higher than expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, incident said:

By my count, that puts us within spitting distance of 50% of the Adult population having first doses - maybe even over it if the NI number is higher than expected.

Just said on news in Southwest we are up to 54% jabbed here ... full of oldies though down here 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be close to our last over 100 deaths day, you’d hope. 

Also, with 50% approx vaccinated and a further number previously infected, feels like you need to whisper it but we must be approaching a bit of the old...herd immunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they said yesterday that the roadmap will stay in place as whilst we haven’t yet seen (if we even will) any uptick after schools have gone back it’s just one stage. So they still need to keep an eye on things as we open up, as we wouldn’t want to open up too quickly and risk going back a step. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ann and Nancy Wilson are planning a final world tour for HEART starting next year. They were never at Glastonbury. They should do it. 
    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...