Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

The SznPAreonly offeringscottish nurses1%too. I have lots of sympthy fotr nurses at the moment they are having to deal with me. 

Me too, they should clearly be getting a much bigger pay rise with all things considered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

Awful - that sort of thing angers me so much. Pharmaceutical profits over lives

Is this as straightforwards as it seems though? I can understand that Pfizer don't want other people to make their vaccine as they want the money off it. But the Oxford/AZ jab is different, because it's not being sold at a profit. If we dropped the patent restrictions, that would then *allow* other pharmaceutical companies to sell it at a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

Is this as straightforwards as it seems though? I can understand that Pfizer don't want other people to make their vaccine as they want the money off it. But the Oxford/AZ jab is different, because it's not being sold at a profit. If we dropped the patent restrictions, that would then *allow* other pharmaceutical companies to sell it at a profit.

From what I remember in an article a few months ago, The original intent of the scientists behind the Oxford jab was to make it patent free, but the gvt hooked them up with AZ as they needed them to mass produce it etc, and one of the requirements of that deal was to drop the patent waiving idea but do it at cost price instead (while the pandemic is ongoing, maybe they're allowed to start charging more for future holiday vaccinations etc). 

I could understand the hesitation to waive patents if they were worried about quality control, maybe even a worry about a race for ingredients etc, but sadly I think it is mainly about profits long term,though I could be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mellotr0n said:

 

 

By my count, that puts us within spitting distance of 50% of the Adult population having first doses - maybe even over it if the NI number is higher than expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, incident said:

By my count, that puts us within spitting distance of 50% of the Adult population having first doses - maybe even over it if the NI number is higher than expected.

Just said on news in Southwest we are up to 54% jabbed here ... full of oldies though down here 😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be close to our last over 100 deaths day, you’d hope. 

Also, with 50% approx vaccinated and a further number previously infected, feels like you need to whisper it but we must be approaching a bit of the old...herd immunity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they said yesterday that the roadmap will stay in place as whilst we haven’t yet seen (if we even will) any uptick after schools have gone back it’s just one stage. So they still need to keep an eye on things as we open up, as we wouldn’t want to open up too quickly and risk going back a step. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...