Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, squirrelarmy said:

For a more modern comparison and one that is very relevant to Liverpool fans like yourself. The current death rate is the equivalent of 5 Hillsborough tragedies every day. 
 

When you see it in real terms you get an idea of how bad things actually are. 

It really does, it’s so sad it’s become a thing where we are desensitised to 500 deaths a day now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What’s the quote - ‘When one person dies, it’s a tragedy. When a thousand die, it’s a statistic’? I’m still fully aware 500+ are dying daily. It’s awful.

On a different note, I see the DCMS are advertising this short-term role. Wonder if this is the start of communicating a plan of how shows, gigs and events start to come back?

https://www.publicsectorresourcing.co.uk/job/d63f60ee-5fb2-49fe-87a4-6034a4b041b3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

What’s the quote - ‘When one person dies, it’s a tragedy. When a thousand die, it’s a statistic’? I’m still fully aware 500+ are dying daily. It’s awful.

On a different note, I see the DCMS are advertising this short-term role. Wonder if this is the start of communicating a plan of how shows, gigs and events start to come back?

https://www.publicsectorresourcing.co.uk/job/d63f60ee-5fb2-49fe-87a4-6034a4b041b3

 

2020 ends with people thinking Stalin made quite a good point actually when justifying his mass murder!

 

(joke, I know what you’re saying, people do become de-sensitised to the numbers after a while, I think it’s just a self-defense thing against the horror- it’s just this year has taken such a dark turn!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, zahidf said:

20201215_220010.jpg

I genuinely hate this country. This idea that letting it spread at Christmas will make compliance worse is on the people for me. The government should never have said it so early but people should also never have expected it to be stuck to regardless of the reality on the ground. 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

Delays on vaccine numbers apparently because of legal permission issues

 

Not least of those will be that the low numbers so far could make people identifiable. 

Oh one 90 year old female in a care home has been vaccinated in my local area, "Hey Maureen, grown two heads yet?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent opinion piece, although nothing in there that isn’t already obvious to most who aren’t part of your government.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/14/herd-immunity-boris-johnson-coronavirus

The root cause of this xmas debacle goes further back, but imagine on September  17th, a day of 3300 cases ( already up from 1000 in August) that instead of seeking advice from herd immunity zealots like Anders Tegnall, that plans were put in place to drive the cases down and provide a chance for the local lockdowns and contact tracers to actually have some effect. This is the date that the government inability to make a hard and/or correct decision caused the current problems, but also all of the problems of early next year. (and probably the date that led to a situation where GFL 2021 doesn’t go ahead.)

20k cases a day has made much harder the task of trying to balance the reduction of restrictions as the Vaccine is rolled out and any benefits in reducing death and hospitalisations are realised.  It’s made the vaccine rollout itself harder as you need to make sure that the you aren’t exposing to vulnerable to the virus before the vaccine has had a chance to protect them. From a resource/operational point of view, it affects the ability of those involved in the process from nurses to logistics people to drivers in being available to work instead of isolating or being hospitalised.

On September 16th I said in response to the rising cases “if you think this ends well, you haven’t been paying attention” and I couldn’t even spell epidemiology at the start of the year, so what the f… do I even know compared to people with actual knowledge like Whitty and Vallance (and Toiletduck obviously…) My viewpoint is obviously heavily influence as an Australian based in Singapore, but with an eye on the UK due to GFL but it just blows my mind how pathetically this has been dealt with from the very first moment.

This post doesn't really add much, but has been very cathartic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, Gregfc15 said:

Decent opinion piece, although nothing in there that isn’t already obvious to most who aren’t part of your government.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/14/herd-immunity-boris-johnson-coronavirus

The root cause of this xmas debacle goes further back, but imagine on September  17th, a day of 3300 cases ( already up from 1000 in August) that instead of seeking advice from herd immunity zealots like Anders Tegnall, that plans were put in place to drive the cases down and provide a chance for the local lockdowns and contact tracers to actually have some effect. This is the date that the government inability to make a hard and/or correct decision caused the current problems, but also all of the problems of early next year. (and probably the date that led to a situation where GFL 2021 doesn’t go ahead.)

20k cases a day has made much harder the task of trying to balance the reduction of restrictions as the Vaccine is rolled out and any benefits in reducing death and hospitalisations are realised.  It’s made the vaccine rollout itself harder as you need to make sure that the you aren’t exposing to vulnerable to the virus before the vaccine has had a chance to protect them. From a resource/operational point of view, it affects the ability of those involved in the process from nurses to logistics people to drivers in being available to work instead of isolating or being hospitalised.

On September 16th I said in response to the rising cases “if you think this ends well, you haven’t been paying attention” and I couldn’t even spell epidemiology at the start of the year, so what the f… do I even know compared to people with actual knowledge like Whitty and Vallance (and Toiletduck obviously…) My viewpoint is obviously heavily influence as an Australian based in Singapore, but with an eye on the UK due to GFL but it just blows my mind how pathetically this has been dealt with from the very first moment.

This post doesn't really add much, but has been very cathartic. 

As someone who has been living in the UK for the last 8 hears and is now back in Australia temporarily, the way the 2 countries have handled the virus has been literally night and day. Whilst I've not agreed with every decision the Australian government has made, they have at least formulated a plan and stuck to it. The UK governments pathetic back and fourth, has been obscene to watch. 

Case in point, travel over summer. There was absolutely no need for people to be encouraged / empowered to go travelling over the summer months. That was the biggest mistake, as you are then creating a situation where the number of infected in the country is changing hourly.. The border should have been open for returning nationals and not for people nipping back and fourth from Greece / Spain for a few days.

Its the half way solutions to everything that have been the most frustrating and then this creates the problem of suddenly needing to make panicked decisions at the last minute.

Edited by MrBarry465
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
2 minutes ago, MrBarry465 said:

 

As someone who has been living in the UK for the last 8 hears and is now back in Australia temporarily, the way the 2 countries have handled the virus has been literally night and day. Whilst I've not agreed with every decision the Australian government has made, they have at least formulated a plan and stuck to it. The UK governments pathetic back and fourth, has been obscene to watch. 

Case in point, travel over summer. There was absolutely no need for people to be encouraged / empowered to go travelling over the summer months. That was the biggest mistake, as you are then creating a situation where the number of infected in the country is changing hourly.. The border should have been open for returning nationals and not for people nipping back and fourth from Greece / Spain for a few days.

Its the half way solutions to everything that have been the most frustrating and then this creates the problem of suddenly needing to make panicked decisions at the last minute.

while Spaffer and co have been utterly shit you're still comparing apples with oranges. The UK is not Australia and couldn't have worked anything like the same plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

while Spaffer and co have been utterly shit you're still comparing apples with oranges. The UK is not Australia and couldn't have worked anything like the same plan.

 

I don't need some anecdote about how the population density is vastly different or the scale of the counties in land mass.

Please focus on my main point, which is that the British government were unable to stick to a formulated plan. I'm not saying they should have followed the same plan as the Australian govenernment, the comparison was made on ability to decide and execute a plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 150 MAX David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 105 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 120 Garbage 125  GOAT 10 (-5) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 120 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 135  Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 65 Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 150 MAX  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 95 (+5) Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • My wife works for a music company, they have an allocation already.  They run a ballot for it early next year. 
    • This is my guess too.    2028 festival breaks the £400 barrier. 
    • Yeah I did spot that AXS had more available for the O2 shows Muse are doing, though I think that comes with the territory of AXS now being the venue's primary ticket selling platform.    My instinct remains they'll probably still play to a big crowd on the night - sales were similarly slow in 2023 but videos of those gigs showed the venue looking pretty much full. Equally it probably would be sold out if the pricing was even just slightly less ridiculous. Shave up to £50 off some of these categories and I think that would've got people to go with it. 
    • Some are definitely already there with that and with another round of inflation looking like it's on the way, it certainly locks that in. And I say that as someone who also isn't willing to break the £100 marker. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...