Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sziget 2020


jj200

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, swelsbyuk said:

I'm bored and not done this for a few weeks, so here goes:

  • Billie Eilish subbed by Sigrid
  • Liam Gallagher subbed by Foals
  • Calvin Harris
  • The Strokes subbed by Biffy Clyro OR co-head of Biffy and BMTH
  • Travis Scott
  • Major Lazer co-head with Khalid
  • Tame Impala

Would be more than Happy with that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, swelsbyuk said:

I'm bored and not done this for a few weeks, so here goes:

  • Billie Eilish subbed by Sigrid
  • Liam Gallagher subbed by Foals
  • Calvin Harris
  • The Strokes subbed by Biffy Clyro OR co-head of Biffy and BMTH
  • Travis Scott
  • Major Lazer co-head with Khalid
  • Tame Impala

IMHO super weak, with only The Strokes having a wow factor, but I dont think that real announcement will be less flat than this, so I guess it is a good prediction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Noeliam said:

Has anyone ever watched the 7 headliners at Sziget?

for me:

2014: 6
2015: 5
2016: 3

So 1 or 2 for my next one :D

I've been there every year for the past 12 years but I think I've never watched more the 3 of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2015: 5 (big mistake to stay at Martin Garrix for the fireworks only)

2016: 4 (big mistake to wait for Rihanna to show up)

2017: 2 (P!nk and Kasabian only)

2018: 5 (didn't stay at Dua Lipa & Kygo, meanwhile Kendrick Lamar was worth the wait despite the Rihanna experience)

2019: 2 and a half (I watched only the ending of The National + Florence & the Machine + Foo Fighters)

Edited by #1SzigetFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Noeliam said:

Has anyone ever watched the 7 headliners at Sziget?

Nope 😀

2015 (stayed only 2 days): 1 (Ellie Goulding)
2016: 5 (Chemical Brothers, Rihanna, Muse, Sia and Hardwell)
2018: 4 (Kendrick, Gorillaz, Dua Lipa and Arctic Monkeys)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, swelsbyuk said:

I'm bored and not done this for a few weeks, so here goes:

  • Billie Eilish subbed by Sigrid
  • Liam Gallagher subbed by Foals
  • Calvin Harris
  • The Strokes subbed by Biffy Clyro OR co-head of Biffy and BMTH
  • Travis Scott
  • Major Lazer co-head with Khalid
  • Tame Impala

I can absolutely see it being something similar to this. I'd only attend three of them though, four at a push.

Agree that it needs a mega name (like Ed Sheeran or Foos) that other festivals have this year (Pearl Jam, Taylor Swift or The Killers perhaps).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, #1SzigetFan said:

2015: 5 (big mistake to stay at Martin Garrix for the fireworks only)

2016: 4 (big mistake to wait for Rihanna to show up)

2017: 2 (P!nk and Kasabian only)

2018: 5 (didn't stay at Dua Lipa & Kygo, meanwhile Kendrick Lamar was worth the wait despite the Rihanna experience)

2019: 2 and a half (I watched only the ending of The National + Florence & the Machine + Foo Fighters)

because of peer pressure i also attended Calvin Harris and Martin Garrix end shows... but with a good mood it wasn't so bad! especially my first year with all the happy people and fireworks.

Also, one of the best decision of my sziget experience was to go see Buika (!!!) instead of Rihanna. Anyone was there? We were not a lot...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Noeliam said:

Also, one of the best decision of my sziget experience was to go see Buika (!!!) instead of Rihanna. Anyone was there? We were not a lot...

I was at Movits, the weren't too many people there either. 

Also, what happened to RHCP, did some information rule them out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Creamfields Festival announced Calvin Harris, Carl Cox and Nina Kraviz few days ago & Martin Garrix today. As far as I know the festival has the same owner as Sziget (James Barton is Creamfields founder) and @So Sad Simon said that we'll have Calvin Harris at Sziget too, so let's wait and see what happens. :) I'll keep my fingers crossed for RHCP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2020 at 4:41 PM, Noeliam said:

Has anyone ever watched the 7 headliners at Sziget?

for me:

2014: 6
2015: 5
2016: 3

So 1 or 2 for my next one :D

Let's take a walk on memory lane

2014: 7 on 7 - went only through half of Calvin Harris, as it was too painful. Bonus points: lost both QOTSA and Placebo for bad time management;

2015: 3 on 7 - Robbie Williams, Florence and Alt J

2016: 5 on 7 

2018:  5 on 7, but left Lana half in the performance because I found her dull

2019: 1 on 1 (eheh) - but I guess I'd have done 5 on 7 (Ed Sheeran and Florence, plus Martin Garrix and Posty for the lulz). Funny fact: I had the tickets for the Florence day, but I lost the flight in the morning from Warsaw where I was and had to take a detour to Paris in order to get to the island without having to sell a kidney and eventually I arrived at midnight or so, so I lost the whole day until David August

Edited by Yelo, the Parmiggiana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bigger numbers than I thought! But I guess it's easier to watch a headliner at Sziget than.. Primavera or Glastonbury.

and it's nice, I would never pay to see a lot of the headliners I saw (like Korn, Robbie Williams...) but some of them were nice surprises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2009: 3 (The Prodigy, Placebo, Lilly Allen)
  • 2010: 3 (Muse, Faithless, UB40)
  • 2012: 1 (The Killers)
  • 2013: 0
  • 2014: 3 (Blink-182, QOTSA, Macklemore)
  • 2015: 3 (Florence + the Machine, Alt-J, Kings Of Leon)
  • 2016: 3 (The Chemical Brothers, Muse, Manu Chao)
  • 2017: 2 (Pink, Kasabian)
  • 2018: 4 (Arctic Monkeys, Mumford & Sons, Kendrick Lamar, Gorillaz)
  • 2019: 4 (Ed Sheeran, Foo Fighters, The National, Florence + the Machine)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SkaPanda said:
  • 2009: 3 (The Prodigy, Placebo, Lilly Allen)
  • 2010: 3 (Muse, Faithless, UB40)
  • 2012: 1 (The Killers)
  • 2013: 0
  • 2014: 3 (Blink-182, QOTSA, Macklemore)
  • 2015: 3 (Florence + the Machine, Alt-J, Kings Of Leon)
  • 2016: 3 (The Chemical Brothers, Muse, Manu Chao)
  • 2017: 2 (Pink, Kasabian)
  • 2018: 4 (Arctic Monkeys, Mumford & Sons, Kendrick Lamar, Gorillaz)
  • 2019: 4 (Ed Sheeran, Foo Fighters, The National, Florence + the Machine)

0 in 2013 :D

we have a winner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...