Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The 1975 2020


Mash011

Recommended Posts

So, anyone heard the album yet? I reckon it bangs but I was gonna say that. 'I Like America and America Likes Me' has got to be my favourite of the non-single tracks, great mix of 22 A Million-ish vocodery stuff with big hip hop beats. How To Draw/Petrichor and Inside Your Mind are excellent too, and I Always Wanna Die (Sometimes) is a massive closer.

The first half of the album is absolutely golden tho I will say the second half leans a bit too far into the ballady stuff which has never been their greatest asset imo. They're not bad tracks by any means, and I do expect them to grow on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mash011 said:

So, anyone heard the album yet? I reckon it bangs but I was gonna say that. 'I Like America and America Likes Me' has got to be my favourite of the non-single tracks, great mix of 22 A Million-ish vocodery stuff with big hip hop beats. How To Draw/Petrichor and Inside Your Mind are excellent too, and I Always Wanna Die (Sometimes) is a massive closer.

The first half of the album is absolutely golden tho I will say the second half leans a bit too far into the ballady stuff which has never been their greatest asset imo. They're not bad tracks by any means, and I do expect them to grow on me.

Given in 3 listens so far. I Like America and I Always Wanna Die are jumping out most of the non single songs.

Definitely benefits from being a bit leaner than I Like It When You Sleep I think. Agree about the second half being a bit too ballad heavy but I feel even those will grow on me with a few more listens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just listening to the album now.

TOOTIME.... is one of the worst songs I've ever heard, genuinely shit. Like some background music for a Thomas Cook ad filmed on a Go-Pro to look like someone's holiday vlog.

Love It If We Made It is OK, lyrics are interesting, vocal way too low in the mix though. could be good live.

not sure if Petrichor could sound any more like a Jon Hopkins rip-off.

Be My Mistake, dull as fuck ballad. like a mawkish Ben Howard b-side.

 

now on the 7th song and I'm rapidly losing any interest whatsoever.

e: left out the intro track, which was pointless, and track no.2, which I've already forgotten what it sounded like as it was that bland.

 

 

Edited by ghostdancer1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ghostdancer1 said:

just listening to the album now.

TOOTIME.... is one of the worst songs I've ever heard, genuinely shit. Like some background music for a Thomas Cook ad filmed on a Go-Pro to look like someone's holiday vlog.

Love It If We Made It is OK, lyrics are interesting, vocal way too low in the mix though. could be good live.

not sure if Petrichor could sound any more like a Jon Hopkins rip-off.

Be My Mistake, dull as fuck ballad. like a mawkish Ben Howard b-side.

 

now on the 7th song and I'm rapidly losing any interest whatsoever.

e: left out the intro track, which was pointless, and track no.2, which I've already forgotten what it sounded like as it was that bland.

 

 

Okay but did you like the album

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well GP,  you'll be delighted to know that I'm finally finished and can safely say that I did not.

there were maybe 3 tracks that were good (LIIWMI, How To Draw/Petrichor because it sounds like a Four Tet/Jon Hopkins collab, and I Like America....as it sounds like 22 A Million), but a whole lot of dull, bland, forgettable tracks, in the 2nd half of the album especially. The Man Who Married a Robot was by far the most interesting track, even if the attempted social commentary was mildly cringeworthy.

much of it sounds like what I'd imagine career-slump Maroon 5 album tracks sound like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ghostdancer1 said:

TOOTIME.... is one of the worst songs I've ever heard, genuinely shit. Like some background music for a Thomas Cook ad filmed on a Go-Pro to look like someone's holiday vlog.

TOOTIME is a bop wtf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their first albums sounded to me like One Direction with guitars, and I struggled to understrand why anyone over the age of 18 were enjoying them. 

Their new album seems to getting great reviews, so I have to listen to it, but judging by their latest single on Spotify it won't be up my alley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, zero000 said:

Glowing review from Pitchfork and also given BNM: https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/the-1975-a-brief-inquiry-into-online-relationships/

Seems they've tapped into the zeitgeist. I always thought they were that shit band that shamelessly ripped off All My Friends.

damn I guess they really are a Patrician Band and everyone itt who doesn't like them is Literally Wrong, huh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big fan personally, think they're the most interesting and exciting current band and the only one around at the moment that I can see pushing into that next "mega-star" level where people have expected Foals, Alt J, XX etc to reach in the past. Think this is definitely their most complete and rounded album to date, pretty much solid across the board (Love It If We Made It, It's Not Living and TOOTIME the stand outs for me) with just a couple of bits of deadwood that should have been left off. Take out Surrounded By Heads and Bodies and Mine and move stuff around a bit to sort the pacing out and it's a great listen all the way through. Like others have said, the ballad-y stuff really isn't where they shine so I have no idea why they always seem to revert back to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, reflekting said:

It's okay, but definitely a drop in quality from I Like It When You Sleep. Certainly not deserving of the high praise it's receiving from every critic.

I listened to ILIWYS the other day after a couple of goes on ABIIOR and yeah, I definitely prefer that. Like, the singles were better, the more experimental stuff was more rewarding and - while it feels like a slog - the new album does towards the end also. I don’t see much of a genuine improvement and can only imagine that the higher level of acclaim is because it was a bit more of a hot take in 2016 to promote The 1975 as a credible outfit, whereas it’s what everyone would be expecting nowadays.

Not to get down on the new record - it’s good - but I think the critics’ response feels a little overzealous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else confused about why the word "bop" is being used to describe The 1975's new songs but no one uses it to describe anything else? I thought it was something that had just taken off on eFests but last night I was playing It's Not Living in my room and my housemate messaged the group chat saying "1975 bop right there". Really freaking me out. Unless she is an eFestivals poster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gucci Piggy said:

Anyone else confused about why the word "bop" is being used to describe The 1975's new songs but no one uses it to describe anything else? I thought it was something that had just taken off on eFests but last night I was playing It's Not Living in my room and my housemate messaged the group chat saying "1975 bop right there". Really freaking me out. Unless she is an eFestivals poster.

Definitely not just an eFests or 1975 thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dentalplan said:

Definitely not just an eFests or 1975 thing.

I mean, obviously the word "bop" is a thing that exists outside of eFests/The 1975, I'm not that stupid. But it's not exactly a word that people use often, yet every time I see someone mention these new 1975 songs they describe them as a bop. Never a banger, or a tune, like people use to describe other good songs. Always a bop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gucci Piggy said:

I mean, obviously the word "bop" is a thing that exists outside of eFests/The 1975, I'm not that stupid. But it's not exactly a word that people use often, yet every time I see someone mention these new 1975 songs they describe them as a bop. Never a banger, or a tune, like people use to describe other good songs. Always a bop.

Will, you have to understand this, bops and bangers are different. There are bop bands and there are banger bands. 75 are a bop band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...