Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, chatty said:

I think they would be seen as a weak headliner as well tbh. Similarly they would fare better with a big name alongside them but theyre on the cusp of being legit headliners tbf. 

Not my bag but theyve done well the last few years, I remember them playing fairly small venues and that doesnt seem that long ago. 

That's what I mean, it would have been the perfect year to bump a homegrown band doing so well instead of plumping for someone like The Strokes. Then again, I'm pretty sure Neil's info is right and they got offered it and decided to take R&L instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

That they won't play this year? The fact that there's no room for them on the lineup. They won't headline, it's too soon for them to sub again and they won't play any lower unless it's a secret set.

Their sub slot was meant to be their big audition and they spaffed it.

I was at their sub slot, and it was pretty awesome in my opinion. They had the sound difficulty at a point, but they played through (didn't realise)!

I thought the same... that they would probably want both albums out before they headline. But I just don't think next year is an option since the three headliners are booked in from ages ago for the anniversary...

So this year or not at all, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phew, I just caught up on the last 40 pages of this thread and they read like ground hog day:

Strokes can’t headline – that’s absurd/Macxit /Phil Collins is a Tory c**t/I enjoyed them at Reading/Madonna/My top NYC band is better than your coolest NYC band/Fleetwood Mac/But Emily said/Why do we think the Strokes/What happened to Macca?/Grande/Female headliner/Strokes can’t headline – that’s absurd/Macxit /One bad/great/mediocre album/Phil Collins is a Tory c**t/I enjoyed them at Reading/Madonna/Fleetwood Mac/But Emily said/Why do we think the Strokes/What happened to Macca?/Grande/Macxit /Female headliner/US bands don’t give a toss about Glastonbury/One bad/great/mediocre album

GAGA

GAGA

GAGA

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SeaBear said:

Finally I am curious about Foals. They may not be big enough in people's mind, but I have a feeling this year's double album output is going to be big.  Jack Bevan, the drummer went on the Foals Subreddit to tell fans 'A lot of exciting things incoming. Big big love! Xx'.
Not that that means Glastonbury... but it definitely could, they play every time they have an album and this could be their chance.
 

Jack Bevan's post on the reddit I assume was about the upcoming two albums that are being released this year, and a tour to go along side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

Just doesn't seem a place for them this year, they subbed last time, can't see them headlining Other. They're knocking at the door of headlining but faltered a bit with their last album. If these next two are huge they'll be headline material for sure.

Cant agree with that. The last album was brilliant... NME best album, outperformed previous album world wide. . 

They have a very good chance at heading the other stage if not pyramid tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

That they won't play this year? The fact that there's no room for them on the lineup. They won't headline, it's too soon for them to sub again and they won't play any lower unless it's a secret set.

Their sub slot was meant to be their big audition and they spaffed it.

Ok well thats just your assumptions, plenty of room for them. There is 5 headline slots they could play in... 

Their sub slot was fucking brilliant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Havors said:

Ok well thats just your assumptions, plenty of room for them. There is 5 headline slots they could play in... 

Their sub slot was fucking brilliant. 

They played the last but one festival and haven't released anything since. What have they done to merit the jump exactly?

The sub slot was fucking dull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hugh Jass said:

They played the last but one festival and haven't released anything since. What have they done to merit the jump exactly?

The sub slot was fucking dull.

The sub slot went down really well with the public and even on here to some extent where it was figuring in many ‘top 5 best sets’ discussions, but a bit more polarising it seems. I wasn’t impressed but I wasn’t with their 2013 set either.

They coulda subbed after Holy Fire really, they were offered it with no new material but turned it down to come back and do it with new stuff. Another eFests echo chamber thing is about the album flopping; it has sold about as well as Holy Fire has here and I think better around the world.

BUT doing just as well isn’t improving their hand so yeah they’re definitely up for question. Their step up in shows is undeniable though. It does balance on what the new albums do, as you say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Havors said:

Cant agree with that. The last album was brilliant... NME best album, outperformed previous album world wide. . 

They have a very good chance at heading the other stage if not pyramid tbh. 

I don't disagree, I loved it. Tbf I was only going off Pitchfork and a few others as well as people I knew who had Holy Fire as the stronger of the two. I'm not saying they couldn't do it, I just don't think they will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

They played the last but one festival and haven't released anything since. What have they done to merit the jump exactly?

The sub slot was fucking dull.

What have they done to not merit an other stage headline slot? And a lot of music writers and myself dont agree with you about their sub slot... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Superunknown said:

I don't disagree, I loved it. Tbf I was only going off Pitchfork and a few others as well as people I knew who had Holy Fire as the stronger of the two. I'm not saying they couldn't do it, I just don't think they will. 

Yeah I agree, they wont be headlining the Pyramid... thats my guess. The other stage is a very good possibility though. 

Alt-J got an Other stage headline slot without their new album being released. So why not the Foals? 

Edited by Havors
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Havors said:

What have they done to not merit an other stage headline slot? And a lot of music writers and myself dont agree with you about their sub slot... 

To be fair mate the reason people don't think Other headline is likely isn't because they don't deserve it/wouldn't be offered it, but because we dunno whether Foals would actually take it when they're probably looking to headline festivals outright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

The sub slot went down really well with the public and even on here to some extent where it was figuring in many ‘top 5 best sets’ discussions, but a bit more polarising it seems. I wasn’t impressed but I wasn’t with their 2013 set either.

They coulda subbed after Holy Fire really, they were offered it with no new material but turned it down to come back and do it with new stuff. Another eFests echo chamber thing is about the album flopping; it has sold about as well as Holy Fire has here and I think better around the world. 

BUT doing just as well isn’t improving their hand so yeah they’re definitely up for question. Their step up in shows is undeniable though. It does balance on what the new albums do, as you say.

Agree with all that, I don't think they're in the conversation for this year - Glastonbury headliners don't tend to play small festivals in Newcastle the month before. These albums are the tipping point, they need something that makes waves both critically and culturally to get them up to headline status. Another What Went Down won't be enough IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gucci Piggy said:

To be fair mate the reason people don't think Other headline is likely isn't because they don't deserve it/wouldn't be offered it, but because we dunno whether Foals would actually take it when they're probably looking to headline festivals outright.

This is what I was about to say, if they take the Other headline slot they can kiss goodbye to headlining the Pyramid for a good few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strokes are not headlining the Pyramid in 2019. There are many reasons why not but mainly cos they are shit (in my opinion). Not that it would stop them headlining as plenty of shit have headlined. I just can't see them having another headline act that would have a small crowd when they are already running that risk with Stormzy and probably The Cure who can't even sell out their Glasgow gig. Expect an act that would probably get a decent crowd like Gaga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope that at least one of 'the big 3' has proper bangers to steam through. Huge singalongs in the field. I don't care if they're 'cool' or 'relevant in 2019' or any of that. For just one of the nights I want a shit-ton of hits that everyone knows.

Stormzy will hopefully put on a fantastic live show but he doesn't tick this box. Neither does The Cure. Neither do The Strokes.

Edited by jessden89
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...