Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Headliners


rzwodezwo

Recommended Posts

Just now, huntyyy said:

But i mean that's your opinion and really has no bearing on whether they headline Glastonbury or my back garden.

What's your opinion then? That they do have the material and are good enough? Neither of us have any bearing on whether they'll headline but we can both have a guess at what the powers that be are thinking. My guess would be they don't have enough good material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thunderstruck said:

What's your opinion then? That they do have the material and are good enough? Neither of us have any bearing on whether they'll headline but we can both have a guess at what the powers that be are thinking. My guess would be they don't have enough good material.

My opinion is the opposite, in that the first album was poor and the second album was great. Do those cancel each other out and we carry on back where we were?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thunderstruck said:

What's your opinion then? That they do have the material and are good enough? Neither of us have any bearing on whether they'll headline but we can both have a guess at what the powers that be are thinking. My guess would be they don't have enough good material.

I quite like the second album but not mad about the first, but the point I'm trying to make is that if the album sales and ticket sales are high then that's an indication that a band is popular and warrants the slot. It's the difference between facts and opinion. The fact is they're a huge band that are going to be even bigger in a years time after they've released these records, it doesn't matter whether you think the material is any good. It will sell and they will get bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, huntyyy said:

I quite like the second album but not mad about the first, but the point I'm trying to make is that if the album sales and ticket sales are high then that's an indication that a band is popular and warrants the slot. It's the difference between facts and opinion. The fact is they're a huge band that are going to be even bigger in a years time after they've released these records, it doesn't matter whether you think the material is any good. It will sell and they will get bigger.

Interestingly two people have mentioned how they prefer the second album, I'll have to give it more of a listen. I just didn't get into it after loving the first so much. I'm not slagging them off, I've been to see them twice! But off the back of that infectious first album. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Thunderstruck said:

Interestingly two people have mentioned how they prefer the second album, I'll have to give it more of a listen. I just didn't get into it after loving the first so much. I'm not slagging them off, I've been to see them twice! But off the back of that infectious first album. 

Third person, here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dentalplan said:

No man I think that's just hindsight.

The Wayback Machine suggests we had Radiohead and Ed Sheeran as SR on the rumours page for 2017 in the September before, fair play on that one. 2016 we had Foos as a strong rumour and then Muse and Adele amongst some R's. And I recall the couple of years before that we were more or less completely off the scent.

If it turns out to be Stormzy then we'll probably look back and consider ourselves to have known at this point. :P Same goes with Emily evading the Paul McCartney question in an interview a few weeks ago.

You’re probably right. I guess if we all throw out 100s of names around this time of year, with hindsight it will always seem as if we knew it along. 

We need a big tip from Neil, word from a tenuously repsected journalist, or a “my friend is mates with the drum tech guy for AC/DC” story to get the juices flowing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

But the next album sounds like they're going back to their roots, so far.

Really? I can't see any of those tracks fitting on on the first album. Unless you mean to early EPs which tbf I've still not listened to. 

For the record the second album is obviously better and you're having a bad time if you prefer the first. Got some bops tho. 

EDIT: also I might add that I feel like they're saving the more out there material for the follow up album next year, the bizarrely titled 'Notes On a Conditional Form' 

Edited by Mash011
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mash011 said:

Really? I can't see any of those tracks fitting on on the first album. Unless you mean to early EPs which tbf I've still not listened to. 

For the record the second album is obviously better and you're having a bad time if you prefer the first. Got some bops tho. 

EDIT: also I might add that I feel like they're saving the more out there material for the follow up album next year, the bizarrely titled 'Notes On a Conditional Form' 

No I meant because the new songs are bad just like their first album, cos we were all agreeing on the quality of the debut. I guess it wasn’t clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kingcrawler said:

Going to assume he's not headlining now, even though there's still a gap you'd imagine other dates will be added. 

On the other hand, if this isn't a sign then I don't know what is.

 

Yeah but mate, the title of his album is Egypt Station, and in Egypt there's...

Pyramids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Wooderson said:

Macca ain’t doing Glasters with those tour dates.

The amount of time he's taking between dates that are much close than Pheonix to Glastonbury, not a chance he's flying back to the UK even in time for Sunday, I also very much imagine with those dates than at least Bonnaroo is happening and possibly even Firefly. He's defo getting Canada, Japan and certain areas of America done to be able to be in Europe next year.

Stormzy, FM, Arctic Monkeys
Ms Lauren Hill, Liam Gallagher, Kylie
Iggy Pop, Dua Lipa, George Ezra

Edited by thewayiam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sisco said:

I’m struggling to see why Macca playing on the Weds rules him out of playing Glastonbury?!!  

Can someone educate me? 

If he's leaving it 6 days between playing Edmonton in Canada to play lower down in America, I doubt he's flying from Pheonix to Glastonbury and playing within 4 days. If you see, some of the gaps in dates between places are pretty much. Also he'll be 77 when that comes around, he's not going to get up on stage in front of how many millions watching at home and sound crap from not being ready

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...