Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Gorillaz


gmb1992

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Hugh Jass said:

Will say that security was nowhere as tight as I was expecting last night. Got to the venue at about 7.40 and waltzed straight in. No ID check, just a mild pat down and a fleeting glimpse in my bag, no worse than going into a gig any time.

I had the tightest security experience I've ever had. Went through every item in my bag, including personal items. Got me to open up my glasses case, put my umbrella up (?), questioned me on totally innocuous items, eg paracetamol. Felt very invasive. 

I went in probably an hour earlier than you though, so maybe they were just trying to get people in quickly before they came on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, somecoolusername said:

I had the tightest security experience I've ever had. Went through every item in my bag, including personal items. Got me to open up my glasses case, put my umbrella up (?), questioned me on totally innocuous items, eg paracetamol. Felt very invasive. 

I went in probably an hour earlier than you though, so maybe they were just trying to get people in quickly before they came on.

Really? We had nothing of the sort, just the standard pat down and cursory check. My wife even forgot that she had some Chinese herbal medication on her that looked suspiciously like brown powder. If they saw it they didn't ask any questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Really? We had nothing of the sort, just the standard pat down and cursory check. My wife even forgot that she had some Chinese herbal medication on her that looked suspiciously like brown powder. If they saw it they didn't ask any questions.

Yeah, but my friend that I went with got straight in and had to wait ages for me! 

Maybe I just got an absolute jobsworth. (To be clear I appreciate the need for increased security, but the way it was carried out felt quite intimidating). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, somecoolusername said:

Yeah, but my friend that I went with got straight in and had to wait ages for me! 

Maybe I just got an absolute jobsworth. (To be clear I appreciate the need for increased security, but the way it was carried out felt quite intimidating). 

Sounds like you got a bad'un.

I was surprised that it wasn't even that busy last night, we were sat up in the circle and there were loads of empty seats. Nobody standing on the back balcony either. I wonder if a mixture of ridiculously cheap tickets and recent events made a few people decide not to bother going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

Sounds like you got a bad'un.

I was surprised that it wasn't even that busy last night, we were sat up in the circle and there were loads of empty seats. Nobody standing on the back balcony either. I wonder if a mixture of ridiculously cheap tickets and recent events made a few people decide not to bother going.

There were some empty seats on the balcony in St Albans even though it was sold out. Guest list is usually allocated to the balcony so I assumed it was people on the guest list who hadn't showed. 

The ticket price was probably a factor, and I wonder if some people were caught out by the stage times? Didn't realise they would be on so early perhaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, somecoolusername said:

The ticket price was probably a factor, and I wonder if some people were caught out by the stage times? Didn't realise they would be on so early perhaps. 

This was definitely the case in Portsmouth on Sunday. Huge queue outside when the band too stage, I'd say there was an extra 50% in the standing bit after 5/6 songs than there were at the very start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RossTC said:

Was there much chat between songs by Damon?

Quite a bit, though with such a long set you could tell the band cut him off at a couple of points when they sensed he was going to go into a big speech :lol:'We love London. This gig is for London', etc. 

Started talking about the election within about 4 seconds of coming onstage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on, could I have gone to last night's gig for sod all? I live down the road (Forest Hill). Please tell me it was more complicated than that! I haven't bought another ticket so thought I had missed the boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017-6-9 at 0:15 PM, somecoolusername said:

Quite a bit, though with such a long set you could tell the band cut him off at a couple of points when they sensed he was going to go into a big speech :lol:'We love London. This gig is for London', etc. 

Started talking about the election within about 4 seconds of coming onstage. 

it went very fucking quiet when he started talking about a coalition, couple folks around me booed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was by no means full. Loads of space around the bar areas at the back of standing. We had a good spot not far back from the stage and it was easy to pop out and get a beer and get back in with no trouble at all. 

Didn't realise it was Kano on Clint Eastwood. Thought Graham looked a bit lost up there on the 2 songs he played on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mario man said:

It was by no means full. Loads of space around the bar areas at the back of standing. We had a good spot not far back from the stage and it was easy to pop out and get a beer and get back in with no trouble at all. 

Didn't realise it was Kano on Clint Eastwood. Thought Graham looked a bit lost up there on the 2 songs he played on

Graham always looks like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DownboundTrain52 said:

Not seeing them til the winter but fairly disappointed at the representation levels of Plastic Beach. Appreciate that Demon Days remains the hit-heavy album - but would happily forgo a couple from there to have On Meloncholy Hill and White Flag, especially the former.

Yeah On Melancholy Hill's omission is quite baffling. One of the highlights from Plastic Beach and a big crowd pleaser, and just an all round great song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017-6-9 at 2:56 PM, FloorFiller said:

Yeah On Melancholy Hill's omission is quite baffling. One of the highlights from Plastic Beach and a big crowd pleaser, and just an all round great song.

bollocks that they have de la soul doing momentz but not superfast jellyfish, I get it's a Humanz tour but the whole album plus bonus tracks live is stupid, especially as some far poorer than previous albums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went to St Albans and Brixton. Both brilliant gigs, and if the current show was played on the Pyramid a few years back, it would be remembered much better than it is now.
They better be playing at the farm... And from what I've seen, guests aren't even necessary. They have even managed to nail it using tapes for guest vocalists (The visuals are stunning when the guests aren't there!)

Unfortunately, I'm not at Demon Dayz today due to lack of funds, but some friends are there. Gonna watch the live stream tonight though. Cha-char-charger!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Horror85 said:

This is pretty good. Reckon they could turn up at glasto???? Also i thought they did the whole cartoon portrayal?  

Bit tricky to pull off live, naturally. There was an early stage when they first started playing live where the whole band would hide behind a projector screen but it's been a while since they did anything of that sort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...