Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Sigur Ros


admscott

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

30 minutes ago, zero000 said:

Surely they're too big for the park? They play arenas don't they?

Love SR, but they're one of those bands where one in 10 people will be big fans, and 7 out of 10 will hardly have heard of. In other words, they won't get much of the casual audience of groups of 4 or 5 friends trying to pick an act they might all quite like.

If they are at the Park, up against Adele and New Order and a WH headliner, then they won't get a huge crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get this Other headliner thing. Last time they played they subbed the Other, and they've fallen off a bit since then. They are a bit of a cult band really and they don't have any new material to give them a push (as far as i know), so I just don't think they're big enough for it. I like Sigur Ros by the way, I'm just being realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Homer said:

I don't get this Other headliner thing. Last time they played they subbed the Other, and they've fallen off a bit since then. They are a bit of a cult band really and they don't have any new material to give them a push (as far as i know), so I just don't think they're big enough for it. I like Sigur Ros by the way, I'm just being realistic.

yeah i think the Other headliner stuff was the thought they'd have a new album out by then, which they've pretty much confirmed they won't. it's just that the Park does seem a little too small for them imo, although i'd be more than happy if that's where they end up (just not vs. LCD Soundsystem)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, siweltrebor said:

I don't want them to clash with Adele personally so Friday sounds good.

I didn't want to admit this but yeah, me too!

 

Edit:  The Park is perfect for them.  Dunno how big a crowd they'd draw these days but the setting feels right to me.

Edited by scaryclaireyfairy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Homer said:

I don't get this Other headliner thing. Last time they played they subbed the Other, and they've fallen off a bit since then. They are a bit of a cult band really and they don't have any new material to give them a push (as far as i know), so I just don't think they're big enough for it. I like Sigur Ros by the way, I'm just being realistic.

Are they smaller now than in 2003? I've no idea but just figured given the size of their tour in 2013 that was their peak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tour dates suggest Fri for me.

Muse vs LCD Soundsystem vs Sigur Rós vs Underworld vs M83

3 of the 4 acts I most want to see clashing.

Edit: But at the same time Muse Fri, Sigur Rós Sat and LCD Sun (with Disclosure Other Fri) is perfectly within the realms of possibility. 

Edit 2: With Radiohead subbing Adele to watch before Sigur Rós. 

Edited by Will-2609
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Scruffylovemonster said:

Big enough or not, there's no space for them to headline Other if Neil's info is right. 

It looks like he might be wrong judging by the poster, but who knows. Park won't pay them enough I reckon and West holts is just wrong. Unless that's just become the stage for any old johnny foreigner, which would be a disaster.

They deserve the other stage headliner ahead of the likes of new order imo

Edited by russycarps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Scruffylovemonster said:

I need to get into these properly now as I reckon they'll be my headliner one eve somewhere. Only know the odd snippet. Have been going to investigate for ages, but this will give me the kick up the arse I need. 

Personally I'd say start with () but most people say agaetis byrjun. 

I'm a bit torn on these though as you need to be in the right frame of mind for them as the music is a bit po-faced. I can easily see me ditching them depending on how smashed I am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, russycarps said:

It looks like he might be wrong judging by the poster, but who knows. Park won't pay them enough I reckon and West holts is just wrong. Unless that's just become the stage for any old johnny foreigner, which would be a disaster.

They deserve the other stage headliner ahead of the likes of new order imo

In fairness, New Order have got a hell of a legacy, a new album (which has been well received) and a lot of hits. I think they'll be more familiar to the 'floating voter', and they've written at least one absolute all-time classic (at least two if you count the Joy Division material).

Edited by Homer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, russycarps said:

It looks like he might be wrong judging by the poster, but who knows. Park won't pay them enough I reckon and West holts is just wrong. Unless that's just become the stage for any old johnny foreigner, which would be a disaster.

They deserve the other stage headliner ahead of the likes of new order imo

Perhaps if they're up against Adele they could play the new, improved John Peel? I guess it depends how much larger they're making it. To be honest they do seem like Other headliners to me but the 'Could Headline Other' club is getting pretty crowded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Homer said:

In fairness, New Order have got a hell of a legacy, a new album (which has been well received) and a lot of hits. I think they'll be more familiar to the 'floating voter'.

Aye I can't disagree with you. I see new order as more suited to second on the pyramid though really, for some reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I refuse to believe that they would let LCD and sigur ros clash.

As of right now, i firmly believe Disclosure will headline other friday with Sigur ros on west holts. LCD headlining other stage Sunday with BMTH subbing. It has to be that shirley. SHIRLEY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Winslow Leach said:

Perhaps if they're up against Adele they could play the new, improved John Peel? I guess it depends how much larger they're making it. To be honest they do seem like Other headliners to me but the 'Could Headline Other' club is getting pretty crowded.

Yeah you could make an argument for just about all the stages really!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...