Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Some people think Stone Roses wouldn't headline pyramid?

They must have some ridiculously high expectations...Beatles, Michael Jackson maybe?

I'm not saying that i couldn't see it, just saying what i would compare Fools Gold with and where i'd see The Stone Roses now, and i thought it is like Primal Scream and Screamadelica , IMO. Having said that it may be better than some that have been touted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the song Fools Gold. From the album The Stone Roses. By The Stone Roses, yea?

I bow to your knowledge, your right :) , always thought it was called ' Fools Gold " for some reason, perhaps because i haven't listened to it for years :) , though i had to look it up to prove i was wrong ! My feeling still remain the same though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My least favourite part of that gig. Mani and Reni being rhythm nirvana whilst Squire fucks about randomly out of time over the top. The first 1:40 of that is pure awful, just as bad as the w*nkery he did live on the 2nd Coming tour.

EDIT: I'm a big fan of that second album, but I just wish they'd have played the bloody songs, not do some shit jam with the Day Tripper riff randomly thrown in where it doesn't fit.

At the time I was tripping my tits off. I thought it was fantastic... I still don't mind it. Maybe I am just biased about it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying that i couldn't see it, just saying what i would compare Fools Gold with and where i'd see The Stone Roses now, and i thought it is like Primal Scream and Screamadelica , IMO. Having said that it may be better than some that have been touted.

I take your point. But stone roses are far bigger than primal scream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the song Fools Gold. From the album The Stone Roses. By The Stone Roses, yea?

Whilst we're being pedantic, although included on some re-issues of The Stone Roses, Fools Gold isn't from their debut album. It was recorded later* and doesn't fit the album stylistically, and its inclusion being tacked onto the end after I Am The Resurrection doesn't work from a sequencing point of view. It really fucks me off when Fools Gold comes on afterwards when I listen to later editions of the record. It's just not part of that album.

*I was astonished to find out that it only came out just over 6 months after the album - it feels light years away. I was going to write "a couple of years", but looked it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time I was tripping my tits off. I thought it was fantastic... I still don't mind it. Maybe I am just biased about it

Nothing wrong with that. If you like it, then you win. I just found the guitar playing on that bit jarring compared to the way the rhythm section were so locked it, they were like a symbiotic single being of groove.

I should have taken acid that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst we're being pedantic, although included on some re-issues of The Stone Roses, Fools Gold isn't from their debut album. It was recorded later* and doesn't fit the album stylistically, and its inclusion being tacked onto the end after I Am The Resurrection doesn't work from a sequencing point of view. It really fucks me off when Fools Gold comes on afterwards when I listen to later editions of the record. It's just not part of that album.

*I was astonished to find out that it only came out just over 6 months after the album - it feels light years away. I was going to write "a couple of years", but looked it up.

Ha. Thanks for that. The plot thickens....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with that. If you like it, then you win. I just found the guitar playing on that bit jarring compared to the way the rhythm section were so locked it, they were like a symbiotic single being of groove.

I should have taken acid that day.

To be fair, I can see your point.

By that point I was in a mood where they could have done anything and I'd have enjoyed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst we're being pedantic, although included on some re-issues of The Stone Roses, Fools Gold isn't from their debut album. It was recorded later* and doesn't fit the album stylistically, and its inclusion being tacked onto the end after I Am The Resurrection doesn't work from a sequencing point of view. It really fucks me off when Fools Gold comes on afterwards when I listen to later editions of the record. It's just not part of that album.

*I was astonished to find out that it only came out just over 6 months after the album - it feels light years away. I was going to write "a couple of years", but looked it up.

Fair enough, as said the copy i had did have had " Fools Gold" on it, and i listened to it a lot when i bought it all those years ago, and there it sat on my shelf ever since, so did Screamadelica until they came back with it, if the roses did perform, which i doubt they will, i'll pull it out again :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Ian's voice at the moment? They were a quality band, my only doubt if they're still up to Eavis standard for live performance for heading Pyra. Not staying the likes of Kasabian or Mumfords have better tracks

Everyone seems to have there own opinion but can be hit and miss. He was never a great singer anyway all part of the charm.

Eavis went to one of there shows it was reported when they did the reunion tour and said that we wanted them to play. So guess he thinks they are good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is Ian's voice at the moment? They were a quality band, my only doubt if they're still up to Eavis standard for live performance for heading Pyra. Not staying the likes of Kasabian or Mumfords have better tracks

His voice was fine at Finsbury a couple of years ago. Don't think he or they have performed much since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been on here in a while due to upheavals at home and general annoyance at missing out on a ticket in October but as much as i love the roses i just cant see them playing this year. No noise from Ian Brown either which usually means theres no chance unless hes completely changed his character and stopped mouthing off.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

honestly, if IOW does have Blur (which i think they do), Prince is the only one (for me) who could come close (and even then it'd be a matter of taste). i'd also love it to be Taylor but she's hardly a crowd pleaser, especially with Kanye in the mix. she can sub Prince (and Flo can sub Foos, and another big female act can sub Kanye - that'd be getting one over on IOW)

That would truly kill it (for me). I like The Black Keys, The Prodigy and Fleetwood Mac and if it's Blur then it's a full house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eavis is a big fan of stone roses. Ian Browns voice is crap but I think it's pretty irrelevant if u can't hear him for everyone else singing every line. I suppose they are as good a guess as any but I won't be putting my House on it!

if they played it would be the biggest singalong of any headliner I reckon.

It's going to be devastating when taylor swift is announced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kanye/Taylor would be a changing of the guard moment for many.

Yep, it's not about the headliners blah blah blah but those 2 whoppers would be a real statement about the festivals future intentions.

I dont mean to be rude, but a festival overrun with people who like those sort of acts is not one I would want to attend. Wireless and Radio 1 weekend look bloody awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kanye/Taylor would be a changing of the guard moment for many.

It would also mean, no indie headliner :-(

Has that happened before?

Really hope we get the Roses.

I can remember people auguing that the festival was changing for the worse when more dance acts started to be added to the bill (back in the 90s) and the festival absorbed that music and retained its brilliant identify. Hopefully Glastonbury will continue to do this and not turn into the V festival

Edited by Boopickledaddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...