Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Of course.

Where does it say "inciting the distribution of child porn".

He gave his reasons for accessing the website, and the police dropped charges.

You can't keep leading arguments with "I think it was something like" when it takes 10 seconds to do the research.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/may/08/arts.ukcrime

About half way down this article

The Scotland Yard statement stressed that access and payment for child abuse images was an offence.

"Inciting others to distribute these images leads to young children being seriously sexually assaulted to meet the growing demands of the internet customer. It is not a defence to access these images for research or out of curiosity."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

He accepted a caution. Therefore accepting guilt. Anyone choosing to watch Pete Townsend but have no morals.

And anyone making such sweeping generalisations on a complicated subject clearly isn't qualified to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever anyone's thoughts on this, I presume everyone agrees that signing up for one of these sites for research reasons is stupidity of the highest order.Proven by the fact that it is being talked about 12 years later when we are supposed to be talking about them headlining Glastonbury.

Of course, it's unfathomably stupid! No-one's denying that. Seriously, what was he thinking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did this discussion occur last time they played?

It was definitely mentioned (as it should be) but I don't think it got out of hand or became a big thing. But then I don't think it has this time so far either.

Ultimately it's one of those things that everyone should make their own informed decision on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread get's increasingly more bizarre by the day.

I'm almost reminiscing for the "Stone Roses are defo playing cos a friend saw a Mani eating a walnut whip and that looks like a pyramid" level of madness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread get's increasingly more bizarre by the day.

I'm almost reminiscing for the "Stone Roses are defo playing cos a friend saw a Mani eating a walnut whip and that looks like a pyramid" level of madness.

I'd draw your attention to the Foals studio pic that was vaguely triangular.

Still pinning my hopes on them subbing and pissing on the chips of the Noel Gallagher fans :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd draw your attention to the Foals studio pic that was vaguely triangular.

Still pinning my hopes on them subbing and pissing on the chips of the Noel Gallagher fans :)

Would much prefer Foals. They deserve a high profile pyramid slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would much prefer Foals. They deserve a high profile pyramid slot.

Yeah, more in keeping with Emily's comments about giving up and coming artists a leg up than the current dad rock speculation of the who, noel G, weller...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • I see there's yet another article doing the rounds about Madonna doing BST, and not Glastonbury.   That could be right, but given there'll be plenty of tickets to shift for BST, could it not just be false info doing the rounds to protect that?? Not that I think Madonna would struggle to shift tickets, or that Glastonbury would have that much impact, but still - would probably still make sense to protect ticket sales when it's announced?
    • Given BST recently I wouldn't expect it as rock heavy as that. I kinda am expecting it'd be where The Cure play though as I'm expecting a second year touring of them
    • Id suggest they would need another new album before they play again - Otherwise the show is going to probably be very similar to the one they played at the last festival.
    • Absolutely not, I dont know of it selling out but they needed TFG and Skyvip to shift them. Biffy aren't either and they didn't go to TFG and I wouldn't say Kasabian are either and they sold it out the quickest. Liam Gallagher did Finsbury Park as well and subbed the Pyramid Stage, Noah Kahan did two nights at BST and subbed the Pyramid though that's a rare one. Finsbury itself will definitely not grant you top spot, that field can hold 100k      That's fair. I'm definitely in the camp myself that Fender and Harry are most likely. 
    • Music festivals call for tax relief as fields fall silent – Channel 4 News https://share.google/gTz3uQusmhvYClP2X    
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...