Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

Although this would be pleasant Glasto normally have a British headliner don't they? Unless you're counting AC/DC as British? + a band who are coming in to or are seen to be at their peak of their powers?

This line-up seems to be quite flooded with American acts, probably needs a touch up of a British headliner.

NiN, Fleetwood, ACDC, QOTSA and SG/Outkast sounds like a good weekend to me! unlikely though :(

I know I was thinking whether that line-up was too strong. Probably too good, and a budget breaker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

Pyramid : AC/DC + Queens of the Stone Age

Other : Avicii + Justice

Pyramid : Fleetwood Mac + Florence And The Machine

Other : The Prodigy + Example

Pyramid: Eminem + Outkast

Other: Nine Inch Nails + Soundgarden

Glastonbury don't tend to lump subs & headliners together by genre & certainly not to this degree, so that's a highly unlikely line up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no they're not. let's not be silly

Lies, its a stone cold fact!

The Captain's shite, yeah, as is Many of Horror, and Bubbles, and Mountains. Their other albums are great, though.

I like Bubbles and Mountains :ninja: ...I used to even like The Captain and Many of Horror..but they got tedious fairly quickly but Mountains and Bubbles are great songs.

Buffy wrote a good album in Puzzle that put them on the up and up. Then they wrote an album in Only Revolutions specifically to hit the big time.

I don't think it was intentional as KoL, actually I don't as an album Only By the Night is quite the sell out people make it out to be either...they both happened to have a couple of tracks on them that would hit the big time. (Biffy had the better big songs though :P).

Alas as big as a Biffy fan as I am and as much I want them to headline the Pyramid, they should have at least next year off completely before the next album and headline in 2016 :D. (Though I really don't have a problem with bands with who like touring loads/releasing albums quickly as long the album is worthy of being released.)

Nobody think Calvin Harris could headline? Or is he still Other headliner material?

I thought better of you, uttter utter tripe. I'm all for having a dance act headline the Pyramid, but Calvin "Kind of the Scots" Harris is just terrible. I'd even go as far to say he gives David Guetta a run for his money in being shit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see Biffy doing it next year, seems like there are bigger alternatives and it may be a bit of an anti climax having them headline Glasto 3 years into the current tour for Opposites.

If their next album is decent though, it is safe to assume that they will headline in 2016 or 2017, given Glastonbury's tradition of giving smaller bands a chance. They totally proved themselves at Reading last year and I think TITP and IOW this year has cemented their status as headliners in the UK. Glastonbury is the next natural step for them.

I think it set's a fine example for up and coming bands as well, as they have slowly worked their way up festival lineups for 10 years now. It shows that bands can make it to headline status through hard work and perseverance, rather than bursting onto the scene and blowing up like Mumford and Sons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression they were already on with the new album and it will be out next year. If they go for a spring/summer release they could headline next year. Autumn/Winter would mean they'd likely play in 2016.

I'm a fan, but they do need to revamp the set or have a break soon though. T in the Park was a good performance, but seemed very familiar.

Edited by Lubic87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't ever think that I would want to see Eminem near Glastonbury, but a few clips from the Wembley gig looked pretty decent. Did anyone see what his intro was? Was it a piss take documentary about a crazed fan coming into to his house to murder him? Pyramid stage headliner with live appearances by the likes of Dre and Dido would get me interested. With Dido's brother free around site for the secret Faithless gig...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Friday:

Pyramid: Fleetwood Mac + Florence and the Machine

Other: Soundgarden + Royal Blood

Saturday:

Pyramid: Red Hot Chili Peppers + Outkast

Other: Damon Albarn + The Maccabees

Sunday:

Pyramid: Radiohead + Foals

Other: Bastille + Example

Not picking on you in particular Drakey, but people need to have a word with themselves if they think Royal Blood are going to be that high up on the bill next time. They've got one album wonders written all over them and the stuff that they've got out now isn't that good either. P.S. Before anyone asks, I am into heavier music and am a big fan of The Black Keys and The White Stripes, so it ain't a genre thing here...

That 'one album wonder' you refer to if people like it or not (most people do) probably will give Royal Blood great slots at festivals next year come its release. Their fanbase will only increase within the next year especially WHEN there first album reaches number one. They could certainly attract a major crowd subbing the other stage at glasto not saying it will defintiely happen, more likely they'll be third on the bill main stage Reading they prefer cheaper acts in prominent slots that create a buzz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't ever think that I would want to see Eminem near Glastonbury, but a few clips from the Wembley gig looked pretty decent. Did anyone see what his intro was? Was it a piss take documentary about a crazed fan coming into to his house to murder him? Pyramid stage headliner with live appearances by the likes of Dre and Dido would get me interested. With Dido's brother free around site for the secret Faithless gig...

A song from the new album called Bad Guy is about Stan's younger brother coming to kill Eminem, the intro video was a build up to him opening with that song basically

edit: Also I've only just found out Faithless is more than just Maxi Jazz and Sister Bliss... always thought it was just them two

Edited by jonodillieono
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do people really care about The Stone Roses anymore? I would have thought The Prodigy, with a confirmed album out late this year would have been a more suitable pyramid headliner than an act that if you wanted to see them since they've reformed, you have and as there's no new material, there's no push to see the same show again.

I also don't think Liam Howlett and co. will be accepting anything short of headlining any festivals anymore. They gained a lot of popularity off the back off IMD, it was only around the time of the album coming out, and after their long absence, that they dropped to sub, or The Other stage, status.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your point re the roses but, they are a legendary band, playing a gig they should have done in 1995 (I think)

Fleetwood mac have no new material, but they are accepted. Id say the Roses would definitely be welcomed.

IMO The Roses at glastonbury is something a lot of people would like to see.

I dont know about the Prodigy. They would get a crowd of 45,000+ on the other. I could see them doing it again

Edited by FuzzyDunlop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your point re the roses but, they are a legendary band, playing a gig they should have done in 1995 (I think)

Fleetwood mac have no new material, but they are accepted. Id say the Roses would definitely be welcomed.

IMO The Roses at glastonbury is something a lot of people would like to see.

I dont know about the Prodigy. They would get a crowd of 45,000+ on the other. I could see them doing it again

Hmm, your argument about the roses I still don't get. However it's here I must point out I was never a fan but I can't help but think that someone like Fleetwood Mac, while they have done an arena tour over here, they haven't done nearly as many shows in the past few years as the roses - 3 at Heaton park, 2 at Finsbury, IOW, V and TitP. And that's just from 2012/2013! If you haven't seen them there, you don't want to see them.

Yeah sure there'll be fans who want to see them again but I would like to see Glasto pull someone different out of the bag rather than an act who's toured pretty heavily the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, your argument about the roses I still don't get. However it's here I must point out I was never a fan but I can't help but think that someone like Fleetwood Mac, while they have done an arena tour over here, they haven't done nearly as many shows in the past few years as the roses - 3 at Heaton park, 2 at Finsbury, IOW, V and TitP. And that's just from 2012/2013! If you haven't seen them there, you don't want to see them.

Yeah sure there'll be fans who want to see them again but I would like to see Glasto pull someone different out of the bag rather than an act who's toured pretty heavily the last few years.

Roses won't play unless they've got new music. If they release a new album, I reckon they'll play Glastonbury. And I doubt they'd play anywhere but up top!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Radiohead are getting back rehearsing/recording in September, so although they may not have an album out by Glasto, they will at least have a few new ones to play and be looking to gain publicity for when the new album is out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...