Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Lineup 2015


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Gucci Piggy

    1973

  • dentalplan

    1626

  • justanothername

    1166

  • Yellow_Fellow

    979

And they were promoting the shit out of them at the fest this year.

That doesn't mean much, lots of bands have promo crap at the fest when they have a new album out.

If they do play next year I say just be grateful that it has been a 12 year gap between their headline sets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not long ago (probably earlier in this thread, in fact) i would've said there isn't a chance that Linkin Park would headline R/Ls again, but after Blink went down so well this year (showing that people don't give that it's all just nostalgia etc)i don't see why not. the big gap between them having headlined will do them favours, and i think people will eat it up, if only for the old songs. they may not be as popular or relevant as they once were but live they seem to have their shit together. just as long as the other two headliners (or even just one) is a huge current act a-la Arctics this year

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not long ago (probably earlier in this thread, in fact) i would've said there isn't a chance that Linkin Park would headline R/Ls again, but after Blink went down so well this year (showing that people don't give that it's all just nostalgia etc)i don't see why not. the big gap between them having headlined will do them favours, and i think people will eat it up, if only for the old songs. they may not be as popular or relevant as they once were but live they seem to have their shit together. just as long as the other two headliners (or even just one) is a huge current act a-la Arctics this year

Yeah I agree. I think someone (Andre?) said around this time last year that they'd heard Blink and Linkin Park were headlining and both were laughed off, and Linkin Park wasn't even the most ridiculous of the two. Plus I think there's just not as many acts touring at the end of summer anymore either so there's less opportunity for festivals to be picky about their headliners - a lot of the August '14 European fests had just about the same lineup except places like RES, Electric Picnic and Pukkelpop had a better one obviously.

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with every year, depends on the line up for me. This year, there wasn't even a full day that I felt justified the price. First time I've not been in 14 years.

However, if they booked a strong headliner I liked, with half decent sub/3rd down then I might be tempted. Definitely not doing the weekend though, can't deal with all the dickheads for 4 days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree. I think someone (Andre?) said around this time last year that they'd heard Blink and Linkin Park were headlining and both were laughed off, and Linkin Park wasn't even the most ridiculous of the two. Plus I think there's just not as many acts touring at the end of summer anymore either so there's less opportunity for festivals to be picky about their headliners - a lot of the August '14 European fests had just about the same lineup except places like RES, Electric Picnic and Pukkelpop had a better one obviously.

Wasn't me dude! But Linkin Park got really good reviews at Download this year and depending how their arena tour sells, it wouldn't surprise me if they headlined, they're not really any smaller/irrelevant than Blink, are they?

And I'm planning in going to Leeds again next year. I've been for the past five years and I always have a great time and the lineups always seem to suit me.

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't me dude! But Linkin Park got really good reviews at Download this year and depending how their arena tour sells, it wouldn't surprise me if they headlined, they're not really any smaller/irrelevant than Blink, are they?

And I'm planning in going to Leeds again next year. I've been for the past five years and I always have a great time and the lineups always seem to suit me.

They only have 3 dates on the UK tour and I don't think any of them have sold out (maybe one of London shows has sold out, I'm not sure of it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linkin Park's recent setlists look an absolute mess - looks like mostly mashups and medleys. maybe it works when there but on paper it looks a bit shit. anybody seen them live lately?

also, looks like Mumfords are in the studio again. not sure if that's enough time to record and release an album for R/Ls / festival season, but maybe something to keep an eye on (would they headline R/Ls?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only have 3 dates on the UK tour and I don't think any of them have sold out (maybe one of London shows has sold out, I'm not sure of it).

They've not sold out the seats but rock bands often don't. Plus they just did Download so people who went along mainly for them probably won't be forking out for an arena show.

also, looks like Mumfords are in the studio again. not sure if that's enough time to record and release an album for R/Ls / festival season, but maybe something to keep an eye on (would they headline R/Ls?)

I don't think R+L would go near them but many think they would still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Linkin Park's recent setlists look an absolute mess - looks like mostly mashups and medleys. maybe it works when there but on paper it looks a bit shit. anybody seen them live lately?

also, looks like Mumfords are in the studio again. not sure if that's enough time to record and release an album for R/Ls / festival season, but maybe something to keep an eye on (would they headline R/Ls?)

I really enjoyed the rock am ring stream. I think it works
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sleaford mods

I live in a crappy little town called Sleaford, and when they first came out I thought they were from here. When I heard them I thought they were from here even more so. Turns out somewhere else is capable of producing that garbage :lol:

Edited by Andre91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...