Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


So do you disagree on Arctic Monkeys headlining in 2007 with one album? Or does it change because theyre men and play guitars. I thought so.

 

Chappell will likely have the biggest non headliner crowd of the weekend but lots of folks are in denial about it.

 

1) AM had two albums out in 2007.

2) IDPOL trolling is lame as sh*t in 2025.

3) As long as there's no overcrowding bullshit with scheduling, who cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NorthernSoul52 said:

I do like a bit of Neil Young, but I'll be honest, I watch this and wonder how people thought he blew the socks off Springsteen that weekend.

 

This comes with some big caveats - I wasn't at the festival that year, it was long before I was particularly invested in the minutiae and I am a bigger Springsteen fan than I am a Young fan. I'll accept quite happily that Springsteen broadly fumbled his setlist choices for Glastonbury, but I don't think Young's looked like an all-timer on paper to me either.

 

But, it is very much each to their own, of course!


My take is it was expectation. People thought Springsteen would smash all his hits out, there was plenty of hype for his set beforehand. Instead he left out BITUSA, Philadelphia, Bobby Jean and Hungry Heart in favour of Outlaw Pete and Hard Times and made people wait 2 hours before playing The River. OTOH there’s always a risk with the Neiler that he just noodles for 90 minutes and plays like he’s no idea where he is, but by his standards he played a lot of well known tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


So do you disagree on Arctic Monkeys headlining in 2007 with one album? Or does it change because theyre men and play guitars. I thought so.

 

Chappell will likely have the biggest non headliner crowd of the weekend but lots of folks are in denial about it.

AM had two albums in 2007 so I'm not sure if the comparison is as strong there. Maybe it would've been if in 2005, The Killers had been bumped up to replace Kylie as they were apparently offered and turned down as they themselves said it was too soon and wanted to stay as sub-heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ac123 said:

Yeah and the bands that headline Truck Festival are headliner size too, doesn't mean I want to pay £400, book a week off work, spend hundreds on travel and accom to go to Truck. Like it or not, Glastonbury is meant to be the best. This isn't the best. Music is subjective, but what isn't subjective is popularity. There are far more popular acts that would have been a bigger spectacle than probably 4 out of the 6 mooted headliners. Even if I don't like them! I'm not bothered about me, I just like Glastonbury being a heavyweight festival. 


Actually there are lots of different measures of popularity. Which one do you think they should use? Album sales, singles chart positions, Spotify listens, TikTok followers, ticket sales? Historic ticket sales or last couple of years? You’ll get different measures on all of them. 
 

Where were promises made about Glasto being ‘the best?’ How do you definite ‘the best?’ What makes this set of headliners not ‘the best?’ Which more “popular” acts should they have booked instead? What kind of ‘spectacle’ would they provide? How important is ‘spectacle’ in terms of booking a headliner? Would they be a balanced set of headliners in terms of crowd appeal, ‘popularity’ and ‘spectacle?’ 
 

Even before you start on other questions (If the festival decides to bin one of the 3 headliners is there a guarantee they’ll be able to book them again? How much do your alternate set of headliners cost and how does that affect the budget elsewhere?) a lot of it is subjective, and you’re trying to apply objective measure to subjective things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Suprefan said:


 

Sabrina has 5 albums btw. She has been making music since she was 14. Maybe check her discography.....

I have. She's got 6, by the way. Maybe check that discography?

4 of them are complete shite and two that have branched out a bit from DisPop aren't much cop. Few decent songs. That's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joshgardna said:

Yeah - I have to agree. Headlined 'Forwards Festival' last year in Bristol - HUGE step up to headline it


When I saw him mentioned I didn’t read it properly and assumed they meant West Holts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it’s worth I don’t think the three rumoured headliners will cost “that” much.

 

The 1975 will be grateful to do it full stop, and probably wouldn’t command a massive fee.

 

O Rod is already touring in the country and on the way up. The performance will be an extension of her tour set up.

 

Neil doesn’t strike me as an exorbitantly expensive act - just one that is selective of when and where he plays on personal grounds and totally buys into the charity aspect of the festival.

 

Probably explains the rumoured strength of some of the other acts rumoured. Also a bit of a pre-fallow blow out as it were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Suprefan said:


So do you disagree on Arctic Monkeys headlining in 2007 with one album? Or does it change because theyre men and play guitars. I thought so.

 

Chappell will likely have the biggest non headliner crowd of the weekend but lots of folks are in denial about it.

I didn't they should have headlined and judging by the performance, neither did they.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, itsfomas said:

I have asked every friend I've seen in the past few weeks, out of curiosity to see if i was just out of touch. Let's say 20+ all aged 30-40... not a single person knew about him.


The problem with the youth of today they’ve never listened to an Neil Young album

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Jamm said:

For what it’s worth I don’t think the three rumoured headliners will cost “that” much.

 

The 1975 will be grateful to do it full stop, and probably wouldn’t command a massive fee.

 

O Rod is already touring in the country and on the way up. The performance will be an extension of her tour set up.

 

Neil doesn’t strike me as an exorbitantly expensive act - just one that is selective of when and where he plays on personal grounds and totally buys into the charity aspect of the festival.

 

Probably explains the rumoured strength of some of the other acts rumoured. Also a bit of a pre-fallow blow out as it were.

 

Neil Young is generally expensive to book. Who knows what Glasto is paying him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stuie said:

 


That's essentially what these Lido events are - a headliner and the rest of the line-up curated by the headliner for that day * 

 

And yes, some APE events sell ridiculously slow but I wouldn't expect that for someone who's been described on here as the biggest act in the world right now (lol) or someone who's expected to fill the Other field beyond capacity.  Just adding some balance to the hysteria really. 

 

 

 

* Just googled to check what I was saying, and it's basically her show with her 'Brat' collaborators.

https://mixmag.net/read/charli-xcx-headline-curate-lido-festival-2025-news

 

On Saturday June 14, Charli will bring ‘Party Girl’ to East London along with a specially curated line-up — this includes a number of 'Brat' collaborators such A. G. Cook, Bladee, The Dare, Japanese House, 070 Shake and Kelly Lee Owens.

Curated. On my list of least fave words, right up there with 'inappropriate'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, northernangel said:

 

Ah yes, I'm got nothing to say on the first one lol. Pathetic booking. Stormzy headlined TRNSMT, played Big Weekend and did Belsonic so it was an English exclusive.

 

Florence actually played big weekend too but we can add U2 to that. Jack did no other British festival that year.

I would say without doubt that at the time of booking Kanye was more of a global superstar and had just release Yeezus and MBDTF which were both exceptional albums. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Drew3232 said:

Curated. On my list of least fave words, right up there with 'inappropriate'

What would you replace it with, just out of interest?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • The Radio Dept.?! That's a surprise to me, they haven't toured in like 8 years. Hopefully they will announce some more shows.
    • I was assuming September in Stirling might have a different issue tbf in the form of it just pissing it down.
    • Yeah so many of mine seem to be just France v Spain in one semi and England/Brazil v Argentina in the other. But the fact those combos are the obvious ones mean it feels unlikely that'll happen because in World Cup history, you very rarely end up with what pre-tournament looks like the obvious final 4. We all see teams outperform and underperform. Which one is the fall guy is a different matter.   I've said elsewhere that for me, there's a hierarchy of Spain, France and Argentina as the 3 strongest looking, then England and Portugal, then Brazil and Germany, but that overall, they'd be the 7 likeliest to win. So I dunno, maybe this will be the time the Netherlands avenge the failure of total football in 1974 and achieve what they couldn't achieve through whatever the f**k Nigel de Jong was with his 2010 final karate moves.
    • Oh I think Infantino should resign. His handling of the whole WC process has been an utter shitshow. But you know. That would require him having integrity or something.
    • Good Charlotte would be fine third down or subbing. If they can get a bigger sub and still get GC, they’ll play third down. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...