Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, stuie said:

Fred/Eminem/Stevie were booked and unbooked?

when did anyone say they were booked? They were in talks presumably. As it gets closer to announcement, contracts will be signed and the whole thing gets firmed up. People will cry about me mentioning the discord but all the info is handily laid out:

 

Eminem- was 'discussed' and someone heard he was in for BST. That's it

 

Similar stuff with Stevie and Fred. 

 

1975 has loads of sources, O rod a million too. Neil Young likewise.

 

If numerous sources were right for 2022, 2023 and 2024, they're probs right again 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Crazyfool01 said:

I actually thought that person who tweeted  the Taylor info has pretty good credentials

 

They do, assuming it is that person claimed. Which is difficult to be sure of with the shocking state and general splintering of social media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredibly silly argument.

 

People are welcome to discuss based on “informed sources”.

 

People are welcome to speculate based on absolutely nothing.

 

Or people can chose to not engage with speculation, or rumour at all.

 

Discussions can place before bookings, bookings can be made in advance and leaked, things can change.

 

People are talking “with confidence” regarding the noted trio - no one is saying that’s it final confirmed 100% booked.

 

Just let people discuss the potential headliners - whether that be by total unfounded speculation or informed rumour. The only one trying to police the thread and mute discussion is the one saying nothing is confirmed until it is confirmed, the “informed rumour” crowd aren’t shutting anyone down are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is bonkers. People will literally argue over nothing.

 

Anyway, it doesn't matter what sources say or who is 'booked' or whatever. Things always change. I remember Doja Cat being so 'booked' that she was on the paper programmes in 2022, but she never showed.

 

It is always up in the air, and anything can happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jamm said:

The only one trying to police the thread and mute discussion is the one saying nothing is confirmed until it is confirmed, the “informed rumour” crowd aren’t shutting anyone down are they?

exactly. the only reason I need to keep banging on about it so much and justifying it is cause he will come in every day and say 'nothing is booked till it's announced'. 

 

Things were actually easier in here when neil was a good source cause people would listen to what he said and it saved this nonsense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, stuie said:

It's pretty simple... SR = someones heard it / TBC = the artist has said it / confirmed = the festival has said it.

 

At the moment we have nothing but SR at best. 

Thanks for that, but I do already understand how it works.

I'm saying that I know we have nothing but SR at best, but so what? I just find it incredibly boring that whenever people want to discuss potential headliners in the ... headliners thread ... people constantly come in here and shout them down by repeatedly telling us that nothing is confirmed. Weird behaviour.

 

It's pretty simple... we know. We just want to speculate and discuss and have fun doing so.

Edited by Nobby's Old Boots
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

exactly. the only reason I need to keep banging on about it so much and justifying it is cause he will come in every day and say 'nothing is booked till it's announced'. 

 

Things were actually easier in here when neil was a good source cause people would listen to what he said and it saved this nonsense

You really don't help starting arguments left right and centre in here though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think we have 2 out of 3 pretty much nailed on, in O-Rod and The 1975 (As much as I hate the sun as a news source, they tend to get a fair bit of tip offs in the entertainment industry, think they called both the Blur and Oasis reunion quite early on). Although, they had plenty of articles and "tip offs" about Oasis in previous years which turned out to be false. I think the 1975 would 100% do it if asked, and would appreciate the significance on it, no reason why they couldn't do it based on their current stature. 

That final slot is where I think there's a lot of ambiguity, I expect they'd like to book a mammoth and more exclusive act that people don't get the chance to see at any old festival in Europe. Booking one of those acts is a lot more complex, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Neil Young rumours die down in place for someone else, and that cycle repeats a few more times from now.

Edited by across97
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/4/2024 at 2:32 PM, Badlands said:

I didn’t move from the pyramid stage that year and regret nothing:

CSN

Spinal Tap

just reformed Specials

Fear era Lilly Allen

Madness

Tom Jones

Quo

Cave

NERD

Rolf (we didn’t know)

Prime era Dizzee

Kasabian before they fell off a cliff.

 

Superb!

It was my stag weekend, we spent most of the days at the pyramid, unbelievable lineup that year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OllieMadd said:

You really don't help starting arguments left right and centre in here though

I'm just passing on the good info cause this thread is light years behind and it's immediately called into question even tho it's good info. People come here to find out who is headlining early. No argument would have taken place if you could freely post the good stuff on here without people having a tantrum cause it came from the discord. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I'm just passing on the good info cause this thread is light years behind and it's immediately called into question even tho it's good info. People come here to find out who is headlining early. No argument would have taken place if you could freely post the good stuff on here without people having a tantrum cause it came from the discord. 

 

Yet you continue to dance around both places insisting Discord is better with your in the know information which keeps changing over and over again.  It seems as though you keep popping in to wind everyone up.  You 'know' as much as we 'know'.  Bore off. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cooperman83 said:

1975

Neil Young

Olivia Rodrigo

 

Charlie XCX

Loyle Carner

????


Someone said Prodigy, know idea how true that is. 

If so they'd be my only lock of those 6. 

Could see my self at either Liv or Charli, but would depend on what's on elsewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stuie said:

Yet you continue to dance around both places insisting Discord is better with

I actually said this place is better for discussion but they have all the info bar mufcok on here. It's not my info lol and if you engage your brain a wee bit you'll realise that info can be good at one point in time and this will firm up more and more as it gets closer to the announcement

 

6 minutes ago, stuie said:

You 'know' as much as we 'know'

clearly not 

 

7 minutes ago, stuie said:

Bore off.

shut up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

Yet you continue to dance around both places insisting Discord is better with your in the know information which keeps changing over and over again.  It seems as though you keep popping in to wind everyone up.  You 'know' as much as we 'know'.  Bore off. 

 

And people wonder why efestivals is no longer the place to come and post rumours and information they have had passed to them.

 

If I was genuinely in the know I wouldn't bother coming here in a month of Sundays as I know how much sh*t I'd get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, fraybentos1 said:

I'm just passing on the good info cause this thread is light years behind and it's immediately called into question even tho it's good info. People come here to find out who is headlining early. No argument would have taken place if you could freely post the good stuff on here without people having a tantrum cause it came from the discord. 

I for one am grateful that you are. 
I hate the format of the discord server and some of the cliques. 
Your posting the info here keeps me in touch 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nobby's Old Boots said:

And people wonder why efestivals is no longer the place to come and post rumours and information they have had passed to them.

 

If I was genuinely in the know I wouldn't bother coming here in a month of Sundays as I know how much sh*t I'd get.

No one is giving anyone sh*t for posting info . People are however choosing not to believe stuff which is absolutely fine . As is the giving of info . The internet everywhere will have the same thing and some will question it  This place is no different . As it goes personally I think we get 2/3 of pyramid because I don’t think we’ve ever had 3 locked in this early … might be the first year though . Will repeat any info is welcome thanks . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nobby's Old Boots said:

And people wonder why efestivals is no longer the place to come and post rumours and information they have had passed to them.

 

If I was genuinely in the know I wouldn't bother coming here in a month of Sundays as I know how much sh*t I'd get.

 

Yet you both bother coming here to stir things up still?

 

Discord isn't a secret society.  You know we can all read what's posted on there anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

I think I’m right in saying over a good number of years we have on here always worked out who the headliners will be, in advance of any announcements.

 

Have we ever been completely blindsided? 


Think The Who was relative unknown.

 

Pretty sure they actually had another gig booked in that day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...