Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

Lady Gaga is a useful get for Coachella, but ultimately, if she doesn't tour beyond North America at all next year, we can't really feel like it is an anticlimax. Know some make the trip especially, but got to be in the geographical frame to do it to boot.

 

My two pence? An excellent trio of headliners for variety there, and played with a significantly straighter bat than this year's bunch of options. A lot of the press releases have been keen to play up Scott second among all acts, fascinatingly, despite the fact he'll not be playing more an hour in the event.

 

There are some very nice names on the undercard. But any suggestion it's putting Glastonbury on notice seems unfounded; there's a lot more work to be done there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously, there are a lot of cards around in play, and Glastonbury has got a bit of a reputation for nabbing a big one-off in the last few years - Paul McCartney, Elton John, Coldplay.

 

But conversely, all three of those had additional reasons to play rather than being sweet-talked from across the Atlantic. I'm under no illusion that, despite doing it before, Stevie Wonder would want a chunk of cheddar. Ditto Bruce Springsteen, ditto Lady Gaga.

 

In a way, I think the festival could consider Olivia Rodrigo - even with only two records - as their "big" headliner this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, charlierc said:

I genuinely don't think this is a bad headline trio tbf - even if I'm not arsed by the three, it's still three acts with popular songs and who'd draw a crowd.

 

I guess it's part of the conversation about what people want this slot to be and whether topping El Pointo should be for up and coming acts breaking into the truly big shows, arena/stadium borderline acts or the creme de la creme who have mega-hits and could play anywhere they want.

Objectively speaking you're right. It's not a terrible set of headliners but similar to last year, it lacks the wow factor that hasn't been there since 2023. I agree with @henry bear i think Glastonbury's pull for 'top of class' acts is dwindling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Justcalledtosay said:

Objectively speaking you're right. It's not a terrible set of headliners but similar to last year, it lacks the wow factor that hasn't been there since 2023. I agree with @henry bear i think Glastonbury's pull for 'top of class' acts is dwindling.

 

I honestly really don't mind this at all.

 

I actually think its much healthier for the festival in the long run to be having acts like The 1975 and Sam Fender (I wouldn't be at either) headlining than every year having a situation where a mega star is playing in front of a jam packed Pyramid stage and other brilliant acts are playing to a 10% crowd on the other main stages. 

 

Those sort of acts will then just stop playing.

 

 

 

Edited by JonSnow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Justcalledtosay said:

Objectively speaking you're right. It's not a terrible set of headliners but similar to last year, it lacks the wow factor that hasn't been there since 2023. I agree with @henry bear i think Glastonbury's pull for 'top of class' acts is dwindling.

Glastonbury spent the last 15 or so years ticking off every big legendary headliner they could and have basically gone through the entire A tier (who were willing to do it) and are now resorting to the B tier. Obviously still able of pulling something huge like Elton or Coldplay on an exclusive, but it’s less of a given than it was a few years back for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, FloopFiller said:

Glastonbury spent the last 15 or so years ticking off every big legendary headliner they could and have basically gone through the entire A tier (who were willing to do it) and are now resorting to the B tier. Obviously still able of pulling something huge like Elton or Coldplay on an exclusive, but it’s less of a given than it was a few years back for sure. 

I don't think what i said was wrong. I do think their pull is dwindling. There are still plenty of world class performers they haven't signed up and i think that's going to become harder and harder for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Justcalledtosay said:

I don't think what i said was wrong. I do think their pull is dwindling. There are still plenty of world class performers they haven't signed up and i think that's going to become harder and harder for them.

Oh yeah I agree, that smaller paycheck but with the added ‘esteem’ means a lot less than it did a decade or so ago. Artists want the bag and Glastonbury just can’t deliver on that and i think expectations are gonna have to be lowered a bit for future additions, or at least on a year on year basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Justcalledtosay said:

I don't think what i said was wrong. I do think their pull is dwindling. There are still plenty of world class performers they haven't signed up and i think that's going to become harder and harder for them.

Yes and that’s true of any festival which traditionally pays in ‘exposure’ rather than cold hard cash. Big Weekend and the Capital Ball events are the same, their lineups are pathetic now compared to what they used to be able to pull together when there was a mass media monoculture. 

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In some ways it’s an unfortunate consequence of Glastonbury waiting as long as they possibly could to push the ticket price over £300. If people had gotten used to the ticket prices being extortionate when they headliner trios like they had in 2017, for example, it would’ve seemed a lot less galling than paying £370 for The 1975 and Sam Fender. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, I feel not having Charli on the pyramid is a huge miss. I feel like it would be a moment. Charli is British, she has the back catalogue, she is a household name, she really gets a crowd worked up, she is at a huge peak of her career and you could say she has been influencing pop music for years whilst not getting the recognition. 

 

I feel like putting her on the Other stage would be good but I feel the year Charli has had is the epitome of what makes a good headliner. (Plus she wouldn't be short of some amazing guests)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the last year before the fallow year makes it harder for them too. Fender, 1975 and Rodrigo would be an underwhelming set of headliners for me personally, but the great thing about Glastonbury is that it's so much more than the music, and there's enough stages for me to find something I want to see instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...