Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, gfa said:

The MCR was just as blatant - something about the black parade

The Download dog they released last year looked like it was dressed in a Black Parade outfit and to be fair Download thought they had them booked for 2025 for months at that point. It wasn't until July/August that they pulled out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, sisco said:

Or no.  That would be the stupidest move they could make 

Not wildly different to the original Dua Lipa / SZA clash?

 

6 hours ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

 

Why not, Avril did fine there.

Avril =/= fine

 

On the pyramid though yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RedJosh said:

The Download dog they released last year looked like it was dressed in a Black Parade outfit and to be fair Download thought they had them booked for 2025 for months at that point. It wasn't until July/August that they pulled out.

 

 

 

Yeah, I would suggest that Download would have heard from MCR lawyers if they had been teased just to sell tickets. It seems obvious that they were intended to play at the time they were hinted. 

 

I think we have to assume they were in the frame to play last year and Greenday are in the frame for download this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

 

It was a nightmare trying to get out after Nothing But Thieves walking against a tide coming from all directions.

25 mins from 2nd barrier at other to Leftfield.

 

1 minute ago, foolee said:


That’s mental 

 

Somehow I managed to see Shania Twain and get in pretty close back at other for Avril. Nothing was stopping be getting in there as long as it was safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Not all the time! After decades attending I still occasionally try  to move from stage to stage attempting to see acts that nearly clash. I know it’s impossible but still do it😉😊

 

Indeed . But the instances get fewer as the recovery takes longer but does still happen 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Avril Lavigne is a strange one - Given how poorly SZA was received you could easily say she would have been a better choice to headline in hindsight - 

 

But in an alternative reality where she headlines - People would have screamed the place down when it was announced - You have got to feel for the festival act bookers sometimes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Crazyfool01 said:

Indeed . But the instances get fewer as the recovery takes longer but does still happen 

 

So many more people to navigate than was when I first started going. I was able to in 2008/10 period for example slip down from oxylers and over the train track just above to other and easily get back within a few minutes to refill on drinks....that now is just a nightmare. 

4 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Avril Lavigne is a strange one - Given how poorly SZA was received you could easily say she would have been a better choice to headline in hindsight - 

 

But in an alternative reality where she headlines - People would have screamed the place down when it was announced - You have got to feel for the festival act bookers sometimes.

 

 

 

I think I'm slightly biased here due to my interest but I think that comes down to if you're a big enough fan you wouldn't care...SZA was all kinda of wrong with own gig crowd vs festival crowd. Avril shouldn't have headlined I will state though, if she's have been put 3rd down Pyramid there wouldn't be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ben7amin_ said:

Avril Lavigne is a strange one - Given how poorly SZA was received you could easily say she would have been a better choice to headline in hindsight - 

 

But in an alternative reality where she headlines - People would have screamed the place down when it was announced - You have got to feel for the festival act bookers sometimes.

 

 

Not really. They shouldve just stuck Avril on the Pyramid for the weirdos who wanted to see her. 

 

In no sensible world does she headline any festival ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, northernangel said:

 

So many more people to navigate than was when I first started going. I was able to in 2008/10 period for example slip down from oxylers and over the train track just above to other and easily get back within a few minutes to refill on drinks....that now is just a nightmare. 

 

I think I'm slightly biased here due to my interest but I think that comes down to if you're a big enough fan you wouldn't care...SZA was all kinda of wrong with own gig crowd vs festival crowd. Avril shouldn't have headlined I will state though, if she's have been put 3rd down Pyramid there wouldn't be an issue.

Don’t forget the site is also loads bigger than in those days … the park didn’t exist for example so people spread out a little more . Although in peak times it can be a nightmare . I do wonder what the numbers were post superfence . It must have been equally a nightmare back then 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...