Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

The Post notwithstanding, I think it’s a reach to say anybody is nailed on/locked in at this point. We’ve had one person insist it’s Fred but that hasn’t been corroborated by any other solid source, and O-Rod’s dates seem to fit but that’s all we’ve got. Then we’ve got Sunday, which seems wide open. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Same. Wasn’t a fan before - friends said it was because I’d never seen him live. Saw him live in 2009, still not a fan (though he has a couple of good tunes)

 

Same.  Went to the 2009 Glasto headline show, got bored.  Left early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Mardy said:

POtential Headliners as Glastonbury Food Stalls

 

O-Rod - Duck Fries, Classic basis, bit of a young twist on the top. Could alienate/confuse the older punter.

 

Fred Again - Overpriced Mac&Cheese. Ostensibly feelgood, bit of comfort food, but is that all there is to it?

 

Sam Fender - A big plate of stodge. Unexciting, bland, but keeps the traditionalists happening. One of those turgid Yorkshire Puddings filled with mash and gravy.

 

Bruce Springsteen - That  burger place in the SE Corner. A classic, but hardly inspiring and sort of wrong place, wrong time.

 

Rihanna - Goan fish curry - Can you afford it? and not as good as it was 10 years ago

 

Stevie Wonder - The crumble stall - a rediscovered old timer, just what you need when you're feeling down, but maybe a bit too sickly sweet.

 

 

 

100%. Meanwhile Silver Hayes, Leftfield, Greenpeace etc etc have much nicer food stalls that cost a fraction of the price, but for some reason are not as popular...........

 

Actually scratch that I know why people are not using the Silver Hayes food stalls as much 😉

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Mardy said:

POtential Headliners as Glastonbury Food Stalls

 

O-Rod - Duck Fries, Classic basis, bit of a young twist on the top. Could alienate/confuse the older punter.

 

Fred Again - Overpriced Mac&Cheese. Ostensibly feelgood, bit of comfort food, but is that all there is to it?

 

Sam Fender - A big plate of stodge. Unexciting, bland, but keeps the traditionalists happening. One of those turgid Yorkshire Puddings filled with mash and gravy.

 

Bruce Springsteen - That  burger place in the SE Corner. A classic, but hardly inspiring and sort of wrong place, wrong time.

 

Rihanna - Goan fish curry - Can you afford it? and not as good as it was 10 years ago

 

Stevie Wonder - The crumble stall - a rediscovered old timer, just what you need when you're feeling down, but maybe a bit too sickly sweet.

 

 

 

If I was feeling argumentative I might pick holes in a couple of the artist interpretations, but that would be well outweighed by concept and execution. Cap doffed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fraybentos1 said:

constructive as always

 

mr 'i want fresh headliners' doesn't actually want new headliners?

There are interesting fresh headliners, e.g. Dua Lipa and dull as f**k fresh headliners. Let’s have as many of the former as possible 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stuie said:

 

Didn't LDR just do this? 

yep, Technically she was Other stage Glasto headliner first and then Reading Headliner rather than the other way around, but your point is right. Pretty sure there are other acts which have headlined Reading and then been Other headliner...Foals would be one.

Edited by glimmers_of_hope
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Sam Fender/Fred Again/Olivia Rodrigo is possible.  It ticks a lot of boxes, they are touring, not headlined Glasto before and appeal to a younger demographic but with enough cross over.  It scans very much like a Reading/Leeds line up though, feels like they might want a more legacy act to balance it, there isn't a mega big act there....But if there isn't one available/affordable then it could definitely work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mardy said:

I've only seen him once, Pyramid Stage 2009, and it er... wasn't great.

 

1 hour ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Same. Wasn’t a fan before - friends said it was because I’d never seen him live. Saw him live in 2009, still not a fan (though he has a couple of good tunes)

 

51 minutes ago, 4AssedMonkey said:

Same.  Went to the 2009 Glasto headline show, got bored.  Left early.

 

Always a good way to weed out those of us without the sense of common decency and good taste 🤣

 

To be fair, I wasn't there, and it seems to sit as this divisive set for a lot of people. The feedback I've had over the years was "musically impressive, commercially bankrupt" - seemed to be one for the purists rather than the casuals, and even then, it wasn't a fantastic setlist for the purists either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fender, Fred and Rodrigo might fit a 2025 budget and probably doesn't break the bank. I wouldn't be averse to that as a trio, but no doubt it would have its detractors, particularly from the Glastonbury traditionalists. Would put the festival very firmly into its "pop" era. Maybe that's the direction they want to go to protect its future? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, glimmers_of_hope said:

I think Sam Fender/Fred Again/Olivia Rodrigo is possible.  It ticks a lot of boxes, they are touring, not headlined Glasto before and appeal to a younger demographic but with enough cross over.  It scans very much like a Reading/Leeds line up though, feels like they might want a more legacy act to balance it, there isn't a mega big act there....But if there isn't one available/affordable then it could definitely work.  

 

It's all acts who played in the last two / three years, so a decent wedge of folk could already have seen them all that G.

 

I don't think individually they're weak bookings, but taken as a trio it's not got great fire power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Supernintendo Chalmers said:

Fender, Fred and Rodrigo might fit a 2025 budget and probably doesn't break the bank. I wouldn't be averse to that as a trio, but no doubt it would have its detractors, particularly from the Glastonbury traditionalists. Would put the festival very firmly into its "pop" era. Maybe that's the direction they want to go to protect its future? 

 

Dunno if it's massively pop to be fair.  Hazza or Rihanna both way more pop than Fender 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gfa said:

too big for any slot other than pyramid headline now - when has a Reading headliner ever done Other

I'm fairly sure there's a relatively long list. Disclosure and QOTSA for starters. Foals/LDR as other folk have mentioned, despite LDR being in the wrong order. BMTH are also another for the other order list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, chickenfire said:

I'm fairly sure there's a relatively long list. Disclosure and QOTSA for starters. Foals/LDR as other folk have mentioned, despite LDR being in the wrong order. BMTH are also another for the other order list

 

BMTH played midway down the Other before they stepped up to headline R+L, I think I'm right in saying.


They're also a bigger draw now too - had the Download slot, and sold out their biggest tour to date earlier in the year.

 

Imagine they won't ever come back to the G unless they genuinely have a crossover hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...