Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

All Skybet Glastonbury betting was removed late last night, before we had the Guns N Roses Hyde Park date and Elton John post today.

Tells me enough that they are both going to be confirmed 🤷🏼‍♂️

Looking back at previous screenshot, it actually says the market will close on 1st December. I don't think it's related to any announcements at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leath02 said:

We had them later than that in the past, think Kylie was December 19th - which would be one day after the final this year

True but that wasn't sandwiched like an announcement on say the 22nd would be as the world cup wasn't before Kylie. Not sure.

----

What happened with GNR sunderland sunday? IF thats the case and AM are a lock on friday doesn't that rule out GNR. I think i've missed something here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Freddyflintstonree said:

Looking back at previous screenshot, it actually says the market will close on 1st December. I don't think it's related to any announcements at all. 

Fair enough. Just seemend suspicions thats all! Surely they’d continue to let people place bets on something they didn’t know was a certainty otherwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

All Skybet Glastonbury betting was removed late last night, before we had the Guns N Roses Hyde Park date and Elton John post today.

Tells me enough that they are both going to be confirmed 🤷🏼‍♂️

You say this, but I noticed that the event was always "scheduled" for the 1st December. So in the systems' mind it's a live event/happening now etc. I guess they assumed that something would have been announced by now and with all the other announcements etc would be daft to keep it live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WhatADin said:

You say this, but I noticed that the event was always "scheduled" for the 1st December. So in the systems' mind it's a live event/happening now etc. I guess they assumed that something would have been announced by now and with all the other announcements etc would be daft to keep it live.

I wasn’t aware it would be taken off today regardless of any rumours. Bookies tend to not get it wrong however 🤷🏼‍♂️ Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

I wasn’t aware it would be taken off today regardless of any rumours. Bookies tend to not get it wrong however 🤷🏼‍♂️ Who knows.

Yep, in fact it briefly came down in November too and was re-added with the new date of December 1st. Might well come back again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

All Skybet Glastonbury betting was removed late last night, before we had the Guns N Roses Hyde Park date and Elton John post today.

Tells me enough that they are both going to be confirmed 🤷🏼‍♂️

Absolutely no chance the person running the SkyBet book has any inside information about who is headlining Glastonbury.

Bookmakers’ odds in general are given far too much credence on these boards - the bets they accept on markets like this are tiny and they will move the odds or suspend the market on very little money and/or rumours online.

They’ve had so many artists at short prices this year already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, homesick said:

Absolutely no chance the person running the SkyBet book has any inside information about who is headlining Glastonbury.

Bookmakers’ odds in general are given far too much credence on these boards - the bets they accept on markets like this are tiny and they will move the odds or suspend the market on very little money and/or rumours online.

They’ve had so many artists at short prices this year already 

I suppose. The Guns N Roses rumours started off a slash of Skybet prices though into odds on. Only time will tell if it proves to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hugh Jass II said:

Could Dolly shift the same number of tickets Elton has in the last few years?

I doubt it.

Nope. And in The country realm only Garth and George Strait are the ones who are doing stadiums and selling em out with zero issue currently. Even if Dolly was retiring from touring ( which she essentially did last tour ) they wouldnt book stadiums across the country.

 

Seems things got spicy overnight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elton’s final USA concert was at the Dodgers Stadium, because it was there in 1975 he had one of his most iconic performances. So, a final UK one surely must be something of the same importance. He’s recently done BST, he’s at the London O2 for a string of dates, so I don’t think it’d be them.

Big problem is whether final means last ever gig, or last announced gig. He’s got several European gigs after the Glastonbury dates. Would he really finish in Stockholm on the 8th July? Unlikely I’d think. I suspect he’d finish at Wembley mid-July 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

Just seems all to old compared to the fact the festival has become so popular with a younger crowd. If it was these 3, expect 3 mainstream American artists next year to make up for it.

Other option is the Other Stage has some fairly impressive headliners up against them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Glasto96 said:

I suppose. The Guns N Roses rumours started off a slash of Skybet prices though into odds on. Only time will tell if it proves to be true.

That’s the price following the rumour though rather than the other way around. We’ve already seen Taylor Swift, Elton John, Arctic Monkeys, Harry Styles, Eminem, Liam Gallagher, Blur and the 1975 cut to really short prices off the back of some rumours, and they obviously ain’t all correct

The person trading this market for SkyBet will be doing it on the side of whatever sport they usually do or will do lots of other specials betting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, homesick said:

Absolutely no chance the person running the SkyBet book has any inside information about who is headlining Glastonbury.

Bookmakers’ odds in general are given far too much credence on these boards - the bets they accept on markets like this are tiny and they will move the odds or suspend the market on very little money and/or rumours online.

They’ve had so many artists at short prices this year already 


Absolutely agree. Need to have a whip round on efests to try and get odds suspended for Led Zep to finally put the use of odds to bed for determining info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Supreme2 said:

https://allevents.in/mobile/amp-event.php?event_id=200023097941421

Just found this, not sure how reliable but does that leave us only Saturday (If true)

Sorry if this is a stupid question... But why do we think AM are nailed on for Friday specifically? Is it because they're playing Glasgow on the Sunday? Wouldn't this Sunderland gig (if real) mean GnR are equally unlikely for the Saturday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...