Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Headliners 2023


Crazyfool01

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Gnomicide said:

This is interesting, I would never have guessed that, but I'm not under 40.

Attention people under 40.

Name the biggest artists of your life time.

I squeeze into this by a matter of months, so......

Solely UK artists I'd say Oasis 

Worldwide I'd go Beyonce

I've given this about 6 seconds thought so am probably forgetting someone obvious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BenG92 said:

He's got the catalogue for it. Just depends how he approaches it. I think after Stormzy and Kendrick people are gonna be way less interested in the "play half of 32 songs with a constant hype man" style.

Would probably get a bigger crowd than both

2 hours ago, Skip997 said:

Exactly, lets take a look, 2022 - Macca, several decades beyond his peak. 2013 - Rolling Stones etc, etc, etc

I meant more like the Cure than macca/stones. Cure are a big act but they aren't legendary like the other two and were still booked recently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gfa said:

Would probably get a bigger crowd than both

I meant more like the Cure than macca/stones. Cure are a big act but they aren't legendary like the other two and were still booked recently

I'd say the cure are pretty legendary, probably one of the biggest alternative bands going in terms of longevity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, scatteredscreens said:

I'd say the cure are pretty legendary, probably one of the biggest alternative bands going in terms of longevity.

Not into them, but I agree, surely they have to be counted amongst legends... Global success spanning decades is a pretty fair yard stick to measure legendary status by... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gnomicide said:

This is interesting, I would never have guessed that, but I'm not under 40.

Attention people under 40.

Name the biggest artists of your life time.

In terms of solo artists

10th Rihanna

9th Beyoncé

8th Drake

7th That ginger guy with the guitar

6th Taytay

5th Rylan

4th Daz Sampson

3rd Guy Goma

2nd DJ Talent

1st Pablo Honey

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, scatteredscreens said:

I'd say the cure are pretty legendary, probably one of the biggest alternative bands going in terms of longevity.

 

11 minutes ago, Alvoram said:

Not into them, but I agree, surely they have to be counted amongst legends... Global success spanning decades is a pretty fair yard stick to measure legendary status by... 

I don't really see how Eminem is on a different level is more my point than defining legends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, gfa said:

 

I don't really see how Eminem is on a different level is more my point than defining legends.

Oh yeh, I get that 🙂 

For me, (almost) anybody who has had a successful career spanning multiple decades would be somebody I define as a legend. And any legend could turn up on that stage and I wouldn't be surprised... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alvoram said:

That's not true though, loads of sites list him in the top ten most legendary artists of all time, from all genres, first hit on a google search (for: worlds most legendary musicians) lists him as second only to Michael Jackson!!!

https://www.thefamouspeople.com/musicians.php

Don't you just love it when people think their own opinions are reflective of the entire planet... 

Macca isn't in that list. I felt like it needed saying. As you were

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense of Eminem seems to be very similar to the defence people give for Jimmy Carr. And to be fair, I agree with that as a defense, but I can also see why he's not a good fit for Glastonbury based on that. If millions misunderstand you then at some point you have to consider if it's a failure of expression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Justcalledtosay said:

Macca isn't in that list. I felt like it needed saying. As you were

Shocking that is!!!

It states that the algorithm works on a combination of things, including voting and search queries... Guess whoever is voting and searching just don't have Macca at the forefront of their minds when asked.

Definitely a legend though!

Edited by Alvoram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

The defense of Eminem seems to be very similar to the defence people give for Jimmy Carr. And to be fair, I agree with that as a defense, but I can also see why he's not a good fit for Glastonbury based on that. If millions misunderstand you then at some point you have to consider if it's a failure of expression.

No idea what's wrong with Jimmy Carr. Just make sure you never catch a glimpse of any footage of Bill Hicks, Doug Stanhope, Jerry Sadowitz or several other controversial comedians. We have an increasing problem with "cancel culture" where intelligent people are being shut down from making interesting social comment through clever satire. People need to stop taking them so literally and see the message.

Still don't understand the "not a good fit for Glastonbury" comments. There have been many controversial acts in all forms of entertainment over the decades, and short of them being genuinely racist or in some other way bigoted there is no way they should be excluded.

I fully believe that those who misunderstood Eminem, did so deliberately through a hatred of/stroke bias against Hiphop, largely fueled by right wing politicians, commentators, media and general dickheads.

I'll repeat what an old friend of mine once said; "people don't necessarily hate Hiphop, they hate the idea of Hiphop"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DeanoL said:

The defense of Eminem seems to be very similar to the defence people give for Jimmy Carr. And to be fair, I agree with that as a defense, but I can also see why he's not a good fit for Glastonbury based on that. If millions misunderstand you then at some point you have to consider if it's a failure of expression.

Jimmy Carr was on stage with the killers at one point in 2019

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

No idea what's wrong with Jimmy Carr. Just make sure you never catch a glimpse of any footage of Bill Hicks, Doug Stanhope, Jerry Sadowitz or several other controversial comedians. We have an increasing problem with "cancel culture" where intelligent people are being shut down from making interesting social comment through clever satire. People need to stop taking them so literally and see the message.

If you want to use a comedian as an example, it's interesting you missed out the comparison I was tempted to make earlier - Andrew Dice Clay.

Basically, while he may or may not originally have said things without malice, he's said them frequently enough and loudly enough and influenced people to believe them enough that he no longer has that defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, incident said:

If you want to use a comedian as an example, it's interesting you missed out the comparison I was tempted to make earlier - Andrew Dice Clay.

Basically, while he may or may not originally have said things without malice, he's said them frequently enough and loudly enough and influenced people to believe them enough that he no longer has that defence.

That's because I've never heard of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

No idea what's wrong with Jimmy Carr. Just make sure you never catch a glimpse of any footage of Bill Hicks, Doug Stanhope, Jerry Sadowitz or several other controversial comedians. We have an increasing problem with "cancel culture" where intelligent people are being shut down from making interesting social comment through clever satire. People need to stop taking them so literally and see the message.

Still don't understand the "not a good fit for Glastonbury" comments. There have been many controversial acts in all forms of entertainment over the decades, and short of them being genuinely racist or in some other way bigoted there is no way they should be excluded.

I fully believe that those who misunderstood Eminem, did so deliberately through a hatred of/stroke bias against Hiphop, largely fueled by right wing politicians, commentators, media and general dickheads.

I'll repeat what an old friend of mine once said; "people don't necessarily hate Hiphop, they hate the idea of Hiphop"

 

Eminem has never made “interesting social commentary”. He’s a middle aged man who just says “faggot” a lot for shock value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...